Sorry for such a lame question:
Where does __LDBL_MANT_DIG__ get defined? (gcc 4.0.2)
Thanks,
Perry
Perry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Sorry for such a lame question:
|
| Where does __LDBL_MANT_DIG__ get defined? (gcc 4.0.2)
a built-in macro. See gcc/c-cppbuiltin.c
-- Gaby
__LDBL_MANT_DIG__ is set to 113 or 106. Right now, in the
environment that I have now, ___LDBL_MANT_DIG__ is set to 53. In the
RS/6000, long doubles are 106. (I'm not sure if "long double" is the
right term to use here.)
I am compiling with -maix64. It appears to me that some parts of
to get defined in fp-bit.h but only if
| __LDBL_MANT_DIG__ is set to 113 or 106. Right now, in the
| environment that I have now, ___LDBL_MANT_DIG__ is set to 53. In the
| RS/6000, long doubles are 106. (I'm not sure if "long double" is the
| right term to use here.)
|
| I am compil
try to compile it, TFtype is
| undefined. It is suppose to get defined in fp-bit.h but only if
| __LDBL_MANT_DIG__ is set to 113 or 106. Right now, in the
| environment that I have now, ___LDBL_MANT_DIG__ is set to 53. In
the
| RS/6000, long doubles are 106. (I'm not sure if "long
