On 23/10/15 10:11, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On 10/22/2015 07:26 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 22/10/15 11:14, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
I also have my own version of livepatch support for arm64 using yet-coming
"-fprolog-add=N" option :)
As we discussed before, the main difference will be how we sho
On 10/22/2015 07:26 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 22/10/15 11:14, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On 10/22/2015 06:07 PM, libin wrote:
在 2015/5/28 16:39, Maxim Kuvyrkov 写道:
Our proposal is that instead of adding -mfentry/-mnop-count/-mrecord-mcount
options to other architectures,
we should
implement a t
On 22/10/15 11:14, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On 10/22/2015 06:07 PM, libin wrote:
在 2015/5/28 16:39, Maxim Kuvyrkov 写道:
Our proposal is that instead of adding -mfentry/-mnop-count/-mrecord-mcount
options to other architectures,
we should
implement a target-independent option -fprolog-pad=N, which
Li,
(added linux-arm-kernel to Cc.)
On 10/22/2015 06:07 PM, libin wrote:
在 2015/5/28 16:39, Maxim Kuvyrkov 写道:
Hi,
Akashi-san and I have been discussing required GCC changes to make kernel's
livepatching work for AArch64 and other
architectures. At the moment livepatching is supported for
