https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105567
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105567
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4dc86f716fe6087f1cf786d69c0c6f3f5af810f0
commit r13-331-g4dc86f716fe6087f1cf786d69c0c6f3f5af810f0
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105567
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105567
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105567
Bug ID: 105567
Summary: [13 regression] bootstrap failure on arm due to bogus
constructor warning
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91949
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91949
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91949
Bug ID: 91949
Summary: [10 Regression] bootstrap failure on
arm-linux-gnueabihf and s390x-linux-gnu (cannot
convert 'bool' to 'const predefined_function_abi*')
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91949
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88927
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88927
--- Comment #5 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Jan 22 00:06:44 2019
New Revision: 268131
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268131=gcc=rev
Log:
PR go/88927
runtime, internal/cpu: fix build for ARM GNU/Linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88927
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The #c2 change looks good to me, allowed armv7hl to bootstrap and compared to
8.2.1 from a week ago the libgo/gotools difference is
-FAIL: io
-FAIL: log
+FAIL: fmt
+FAIL: go/constant
+FAIL: html/template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88927
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Oops, ignore the cpu_no_init.go related comments, I was looking at my trunk
checkout apparently before r268084, while the failed build was with that change
which added +build !arm in there. That explains
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88927
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Will try that. That said, I don't understand why cpu_no_init.go isn't used in
that case.
Inthe build log I see
/usr/bin/mkdir -p internal; files=`echo ../../../libgo/go/internal/cpu/cpu.go
cpugen.go | sed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88927
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
This is likely fixed by https://golang.org/cl/158717.
||bi
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
Summary|[9 Regression] Bootstrap|[9 Regression] Bootstrap
|failure on arm in libgo |failure on arm in libgo
||starting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88927
Bug ID: 88927
Summary: [9 Regression] Bootstrap failure on arm in libgo
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87661
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87661
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87661
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Oct 23 19:02:29 2018
New Revision: 265439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265439=gcc=rev
Log:
PR go/87661
runtime: remove unused armArch, hwcap and hardDiv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87661
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87661
Bug ID: 87661
Summary: [9 Regression] libgo bootstrap failure on
arm-linux-gnueabihf (redefinition of constants)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #24 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #22)
Does this mean effectively nothing lower than ARMv7 can build
arm-*-linux-androideabi?
Apparently so, but it should be quite easy to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #25 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This statement is a little ambiguous to me, which is the current situation?
A) There are no plans to alter sigtramp-android.c to support ARM
architectures below ARMv7.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #23 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st ---
(In reply to John Marino from comment #17)
In the end, there were 6 failures.
C52103x
C52104x
C52104y
c74004a (hung)
cb1010c
cb1010d
To follow up, I reworked the testsuite
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #21 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st ---
Hi Eric,
When I tried to build the ARMv5 cross compiler (-march=armv5te) I get the
following error:
/tmp//cc5BKnWK.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp//cc5BKnWK.s:31: Error: selected processor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
When I tried to build the ARMv5 cross compiler (-march=armv5te) I get the
following error:
/tmp//cc5BKnWK.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp//cc5BKnWK.s:31: Error: selected
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Apr 9 07:57:48 2014
New Revision: 209237
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209237root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ada/60411
* s-osinte-android.ads:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry about the mess, can you try after the latest change?
Summary|ADA bootstrap failure on|Ada bootstrap failure on
|ARM |ARM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #15 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st ---
Hi Eric,
The compiler builds happily now.
It started right into ACATS testing and has passed the first 3 chapters
flawlessly (with the current setup ACATS takes hours because each test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The compiler builds happily now.
Great, thanks for the quick feedback.
It started right into ACATS testing and has passed the first 3 chapters
flawlessly (with the current
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #17 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st ---
Hi Eric,
In the end, there were 6 failures. It appears that the ARM unwinder isn't
quite right yet. After 2314 passes, the six ACATS failures were:
C52103x
C52104x
C52104y
c74004a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #18 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
In the end, there were 6 failures. It appears that the ARM unwinder isn't
quite right yet. After 2314 passes, the six ACATS failures were:
C52103x
C52104x
C52104y
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #19 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st ---
ah sorry, I always seem to conclude wrongly that stack checking requires unwind
support. I'm not sure why I always conflate those two things.
So this patch was proposed 9 months ago
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #20 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
ah sorry, I always seem to conclude wrongly that stack checking requires
unwind support. I'm not sure why I always conflate those two things.
Yes, it does, but it first needs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Apr 8 08:23:56 2014
New Revision: 209210
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209210root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ada/60411
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Apr 8 09:03:42 2014
New Revision: 209211
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209211root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ada/60411
* sigtramp-armdroid.c:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Apr 8 20:35:14 2014
New Revision: 209227
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209227root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ada/60411
* sigtramp.h: Add
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gnugcc at marino dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #12 from John Marino gnugcc at marino dot st ---
I am also seeing these errors:
s-intman.adb:263:32: SA_NODEFER is not visible
s-intman.adb:263:32: non-visible declaration at s-linux.ads:110
s-intman.adb:263:45: SA_RESTART is not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
the cross build for arm-linux-gnueabihf succeeds again.
Great.
So they use the same system.ads, which now links with a-exexpr-gcc.adb;
Should'nt this target now also use EH_MECHANISM=-gcc or -arm?
Yes, android should also use
EH_MECHANISM=-arm
I'll make that change.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #7 from charlet at adacore dot com charlet at adacore dot com ---
the cross build for arm-linux-gnueabihf succeeds again.
Great.
So they use the same system.ads, which now links with a-exexpr-gcc.adb;
Should'nt this target now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #3 from Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: charlet
Date: Fri Mar 7 20:35:33 2014
New Revision: 208419
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208419root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-03-07 Doug Rupp r...@adacore.com
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
(In reply to Arnaud Charlet from comment #4)
Let me know how things go after the recent commit I made on trunk, thanks.
I'll try that on monday,
but how about
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59913
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Feb 4 18:56:59 2014
New Revision: 207485
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207485root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-02-04 Vladimir Makarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59913
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59913
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59913
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #4)
I'm still bisecting, but I suspect two recent commits to lra-constraints:
r206938
2014-01-22 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59913
Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59913
Bug ID: 59913
Summary: [4.9 Regresion] bootstrap failure on
arm-linux-gnueabihf
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59913
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59913
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
complete build log at
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-toolchain-r/+archive/test/+build/5489392
Configured with: -v
--with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 4.9-20140122-1ubuntu1'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59913
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59913
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59913
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59770
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59770
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59770
Martin Guy martinwguy at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martinwguy at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59770
Bug ID: 59770
Summary: [4.9 Regression] bootstrap failure for
arm-linux-gnueabi targeting armv4t
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56640
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56640
Bug #: 56640
Summary: [4.8 Regression] bootstrap failure on
arm-linux-gnueabi{,hf}
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56640
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56640
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-17
15:24:52 UTC ---
the Debian builds use glibc-2.13 and binutils 2.22.x., the Ubuntu build
glibc-2.17 and binutils-2.23.x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56640
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56640
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56640
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-17
16:28:27 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Mar 17 16:28:16 2013
New Revision: 196753
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196753
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56640
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-17
16:29:07 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Mar 17 16:28:55 2013
New Revision: 196754
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196754
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54843
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54843
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54843
Bug #: 54843
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ada bootstrap failure on
arm-linux-gnueabi
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54843
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46704
Summary: ada bootstrap failure on arm-linux-gnueabi
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44335
--- Comment #9 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-03 10:45:46 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Wed Nov 3 10:45:40 2010
New Revision: 166238
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166238
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44335
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 10:47 ---
Can somebody ping the patch (or close this bug if it alread was applied)?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-07-20 08:53 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Here is my patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg00085.html
bootstrap regtest finished successfully on i686-pc-linuc-gnu in trunk
revision 161664.
I've bootstrapped and
--- Comment #6 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-17 22:57 ---
Not mine anymore.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-02 08:27 ---
Here is my patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg00085.html
bootstrap regtest finished successfully on i686-pc-linuc-gnu in trunk
revision 161664.
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #4 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-01 19:14 ---
Alternatively, we could hookize FLOAT_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN, and make jcf-parse.c
include target.h so it gets access to the target vector. This would also
be better since then the code in jfc-parse.c no longer depends
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44335
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |steven at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-06-06 15:42 ---
Patch posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg00472.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44335
--- Comment #2 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-05-31 16:20 ---
Steven's patch in r160039 did get me a past the error in java/except.c, however
then the bootstrap dies a few files later with:
/home/mikpe/gcc-4.6-20100529/gcc/java/jcf-parse.c: In function
'handle_constant':
.
--
Summary: [4.6 regression] gcc-4.6-20100529 java bootstrap failure
on arm-linux-gnueabi
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-30 20:45 ---
Should be fixed with
2010-05-30 Steven Bosscher ste...@gcc.gnu.org
* except.c: Include tm.h.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-04 10:50 ---
Subject: Bug 43964
Author: bernds
Date: Tue May 4 10:49:41 2010
New Revision: 159022
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=159022
Log:
PR bootstrap/43964
* ira-color.c
--- Comment #4 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-05-04 11:23 ---
Thanks Bernd for committing this. Closing as fixed.
--
mikpe at it dot uu dot se changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|4.6-20100501 (r158965) |[4.6 Regression] 4.6-
|bootstrap failure on ARM
--- Comment #1 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-05-03 10:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=20545)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20545action=view)
suggested fix for PR43964
Confirmed r158911 to be the cause of this bootstrap failure. Attached patch
should fix it.
--- Comment #2 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-05-04 00:56 ---
Bootstrap with the patch succeeded on ARM. Patch posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg00187.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43964
failure on ARM, ira-
color.c triggers -Werror
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy
Compiling with --disable-bootstrap and using the resulting compiler to
bootstrap gcc solved the problem.
Rafael
Do we support bootstraping on ARM? I am trying to bootstrap inside a
scratchbox and currently I am having the following error on trunk and
the 4.2 branch:
../branch-4.2/configure --enable-checking
reduced test case:
--
typedef void (*personality_routine) (
void *);
typedef struct
{
unsigned vfp[63];
} phase1_vrs;
void
__gnu_Unwind_RaiseException (unsigned * ucbp);
void
__gnu_Unwind_RaiseException (unsigned *
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 12:27 ---
Subject: Bug 28215
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Aug 28 12:26:41 2006
New Revision: 116505
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116505
Log:
2006-07-06 Jason Merrill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cp/
PR
ignored SI file
/home/rearnsha/gnusrc/gcc-cross/trunk/libstdc++-v3/src/fstream-inst.cc line 50
size integer_cst 0xbda2c380 32 unit size integer_cst 0xbda2c040 4
align 32
saved-insns 0xbd8b8bfc
--
Summary: [4.2 regression] Bootstrap failure on arm-eabi
Product: gcc
--- Comment #1 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-01 18:04
---
Created an attachment (id=11787)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11787action=view)
gziped attachment of failing source file (pre-processed)
cc1plus fstream-inst.ii -quiet -dumpbase
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
