On Dec 4, 2005, at 3:09 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
I have noticed that there was a significant speed regression in the
c++ code generation between gcc 3.3 and gcc 4.0.x.
Gotta wonder if changing the inlining parameters would help you.
Mike,
Do you mean using -fno-threadsafe-statics or do you have any other
inlining changes in mind?
Jack
In benchmarking a build of xplor-nih (which is a mix of c++,c, and
fortran) built entirely under gcc 4.1 or built using gcc 4.1's gfortran
and either Apple's gcc 4.0.1 or gcc 3.3, I have noticed that there
was a significant speed regression in the c++ code generation between
gcc 3.3 and gcc
