https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64220
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64220
Bug ID: 64220
Summary: gcc preprocessor defines outside of the reserved
namespace: unix linux AVR
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64220
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64220
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64220
--- Comment #2 from Cameron Tacklind cameron at tacklind dot com ---
Ah, I had not seen a reference to the -std making a difference. You are right
that adding -std=c99 removes the extra define.
Of note, I'm finding it difficult to find where
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64220
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.2/cpp/System-specific-Predefined-Macros.html#System-specific-Predefined-Macros
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64220
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.2/cpp/System-specific-Predefined-
Macros.html#System-specific-Predefined-Macros
When the -ansi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64220
--- Comment #5 from Cameron Tacklind cameron at tacklind dot com ---
Pardon my brevity. Yes, I'd seen that.
I was trying to comment on this list seemingly missing a reference to that
particular difference. Or that if it is listed, it is
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 09:58:55PM +0800, Zhang Lin wrote:
Hello,
I have encountered an issue when building ACE with MinGW and GCC 4.4.1
The following macro was not accepted by the preprocessor and it reported such
an error: error: operator '==' has no left operand.
#if !defined
Hello,
I have encountered an issue when building ACE with MinGW and GCC 4.4.1
The following macro was not accepted by the preprocessor and it reported such
an error: error: operator '==' has no left operand.
#if !defined (ACE_HAS_NONSTATIC_OBJECT_MANAGER)
# define
2009/10/23 Zhang Lin zhanglin0...@163.com:
Hello,
I have encountered an issue when building ACE with MinGW and GCC 4.4.1
The following macro was not accepted by the preprocessor and it reported such
an error: error: operator '==' has no left operand.
#if !defined
-Wall -o Test.exe Test.cpp -lstdc++ -s
and the error message is:
Test.cpp:3:41: error: operator '==' has no left operand
- Original Message -
From: John Graham johngavingra...@googlemail.com
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: Why does GCC Preprocessor
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: Why does GCC Preprocessor NOT support such macro?
2009/10/23 Zhang Lin zhanglin0...@163.com:
Hello,
I have encountered an issue when building ACE with MinGW and GCC 4.4.1
The following macro was not accepted by the preprocessor
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Zhang Lin zhanglin0...@163.com wrote:
Sorry, maybe my representation is not quite clear.
I mean that I didn't define ACE_HAS_NONSTATIC_OBJECT_MANAGER at all, so the
preprocesser should not process #elif (ACE_HAS_NONSTATIC_OBJECT_MANAGER ==
0), the following
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:07:07PM -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote:
Can some one tell me if gcc preprocessor can support in some way
the following
features
You are asking a beginner C programming question. gcc's preprocessor
does what standard C preprocessors do.
On 20 April 2007 18:28, drizzle drizzle wrote:
Ok can you tell me what directives does it provide to do what I
have said . And I am not a beginner to gcc.
Then you should have RTFMd by now.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 01:27:48PM -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote:
Ok can you tell me what directives does it provide to do what I
have said . And I am not a beginner to gcc.
The answer is that gcc provides what the C standard specifies and nothing
more. You appear to want a more
Any developer sense on what it might take to extend the gcc
preprocessor to do these ? I have some experience with gcc front end.
I am especially keen abt multiline macros, so that the lines can be on
separate lines. Any neat trick that can accomplish this by using
#define ?
dz
On 4/20/07, Joe
drizzle drizzle wrote:
Any developer sense on what it might take to extend the gcc
preprocessor to do these ? I have some experience with gcc front end.
I am especially keen abt multiline macros, so that the lines can be on
separate lines. Any neat trick that can accomplish this by using
#define
drizzle drizzle wrote:
Any developer sense on what it might take to extend the gcc
preprocessor to do these ? I have some experience with gcc front end.
I am especially keen abt multiline macros, so that the lines can be on
separate lines. Any neat trick that can accomplish this by using
#define
Hi
Can some one tell me if gcc preprocessor can support in some way
the following
features
1. Repeating a block a certain number of times
2. Multiline macros with new lines
3. Setting a symbolic constant inside a #define
thanks
dz
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:07:07PM -0400, drizzle drizzle wrote:
Can some one tell me if gcc preprocessor can support in some way
the following
features
You are asking a beginner C programming question. gcc's preprocessor
does what standard C preprocessors do.
22 matches
Mail list logo
