On Apr 6, 2005 2:08 PM, tbp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll try to pinpoint the problem a bit better.
Alas, since the other day the code using that static array has changed
a bit and i can't reproduce the bug.
So, after all, it really was gcc's fault.
I'll try to dig up the original version.
On Apr 6, 2005 3:18 AM, James E Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would guess a limitation of cygwin binutils support, or perhaps of
> Windows itself.
Binutils, perhaps. Windows certainly not as msvc2k3 & icc8.1 don't
have such issue with the same code.
> This seems to work fine on linux. If
tbp wrote:
Question: why do i get an unaligned array as soon as g++ (4.1.0
20050327, cygwin) finds out that it's static (i mean even if i try to
fool it around a bit)?
I would guess a limitation of cygwin binutils support, or perhaps of
Windows itself.
This seems to work fine on linux. If I comp
Ok, since i've already looked like an uneducated fool today and i'm
grasping at straws...
Question: why do i get an unaligned array as soon as g++ (4.1.0
20050327, cygwin) finds out that it's static (i mean even if i try to
fool it around a bit)?
It seems to only happen with multidimensionnal arra