* Basile STARYNKEVITCH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070102 22:49]:
> Maybe, instead of using built-ins, we could extend the __attribute__
> facility for functions (and expect the libc developers to progressively use
> them). Eg
>
>void free(void*) __attribute((pointer_invalid(1)));
>
> would mean tha
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 02:30:45PM -0700, Roger Sayle wrote:
>
> I think recognizing "free" as a built-in (without an intrinsic) is the
> correct way to go. In theory, all of the functions listed in
> cp/cfns.gperf should be defined via builtins.def, but unfortunately
> the compile-time (and memo