On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 04:16:17PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Have you got a chance to take a look at the materials?
> If yes, what do you think on it?
Nope, sorry, too busy with other things.
OG.
picture here:
http://docs.georgeshagov.com/twiki/tiki-index.php?page=Matrix+Linking+how+it+works
2. Pointer 1, 2... are vptrs
3. The idea is that each module, library (.so) has a row of vptrs,
when it is required to make a dynamic binding this row is going to be
copied to the similar one, the
Thank you for your reply, Oliver.
Briefly speaking the solution to the problems you have mentioned looks
like this:
1. take a loot at the first picture here:
http://docs.georgeshagov.com/twiki/tiki-index.php?page=Matrix+Linking+how+it+works
2. Pointer 1, 2... are vptrs
3. The idea is that
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:49:03AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Changing the _vptr or C equivalent dynamically]
> I would like the community would have considered the idea. I am ready to
> answer all the questions you might have.
Changing the virtual function pointer dynamically using a seria
I am trying to say is that there is an additional realization of
dynamic binding, which is called matrix linking. There are other's
realization of that idea, like Darwin project for instance, but all of
these realization has one serious stumbling block which makes their use
almost impo
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 09:33:16AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is this a thread safe operation for your Ptolomy project?
> Should you suspend the application in order to load 'new classes' there?
I answered this off-list, because it's off-topic.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: FW: matrix linking
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 09:54:25PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have an invention which makes possible to brake through the barriers of
> common software development.
Nothing new here: add a level of indirection (or
v.com/twiki/tiki-index.php?page=Matrix+Linking. I
would have been kindly appreciated of your comments on the subject.
In case of questions do no hesitate to ask.
Yours sincerely,
George.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 09:54:25PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have an invention which makes possible to brake through the barriers of
> common software development.
Nothing new here: add a level of indirection (or use C++ virtual
functions), and dynamically load code. In the Ptolemy proj
On Feb 8, 2006, at 5:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the idea of matrix linking is quite different
You could have saved all the space and just said, yeah, but mine can
rebind printf. My response would be, yes, so can we. So, I've yet
to see much of a difference.
Mike, sorry for not answering.
I think the idea of matrix linking is quite different, let me try to
explain. I
would not say the matrix linking is the bynamic bunding, or rather to
say it is
not only the dynamic binding. Let us consider a sample:
void foo()
{
printf(foo\n);
}
int main
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Mike, dear Sirs.
Thank you very much for the letter. The idea of runtime linking seems
to be
quite natural, therefore last half a year couple of time I thought
myself a
madman. I am glad to see your letter, it means if it be I am crazy I
am not
alone :-)
Natu
nt to understand the limitations and
gotchas. " ?
Yes, US law makes everything I write copyright. :-)/2
About my initial approach. I completely reviewed it :-). it looks
like this:
http://docs.georgeshagov.com/twiki/tiki-index.php?page=Matrix
+Linking+-+The+shortest+way+to+go,
it would ap
possible to modify the
algorithms runtime, without recompilation. For this case we need interpreter.
In order to handle the calls to the interpreted function I am using approach
with proxy-functions. (BTW you may find this topic interesting:
http://docs.georgeshagov.com/twiki/tiki-index.php?page=Matrix+Linking+-
Beg your pardon, I lost the CC.
regards.
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:16:10 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: matrix linking
To: Sean Callanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dear Sean.
Thank yo
econd, respecting your time, I will straight to the matter.
I have some kind of an idea, which I called 'matrix linking'. It
would appear
this is a new kind of linking. Briefly it gives (C/C++) developer the
opportunity to change the business logic of the application at run-
ti
16 matches
Mail list logo
