Lars Callenbach wrote:
v = new double **[100];
operator new[]() - operator new() - malloc () - _int_malloc()
Without a testcase we can compile, we probably can't do anything except
point out that a malloc failure is probably not due to a gcc problem.
--
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support,
I have tried to compile
...
double ***v;
v = new double **[100];
...
in different classes. Sometimes the program shows a sigsegv at the new
operator. Using gdb the code has called the following functions:
operator new[]() - operator new() - malloc () - _int_malloc()
Is this a g++-3.4
