https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115827
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
-msoft-float is the difference ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115827
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-none-eabi
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115827
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>arm-gnu-toolchain-13.3.rel1-x86_64-arm-none-eabi
Works with GCC 13.3.0 with:
COLLECT_GCC=/opt/compiler-explorer/arm/gcc-13.3.0/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/bin/arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf-g++
Target:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115827
Bug ID: 115827
Summary: uninit-17.c no longer emits expected warning on
arm-none-eabi
Product: gcc
Version: 13.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115826
Bug ID: 115826
Summary: vect-tsvc-s1281.c fails with with -ffast-math on
arm-none-eabi
Product: gcc
Version: 13.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 30 01:31:17 UTC 2024 (revision r15-1725-g1bcfed4c52b)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 30 01:08:27 UTC 2024 (revision r13-8880-g5a4ea0b20c1)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 30 00:45:41 UTC 2024 (revision r13-8880-g5a4ea0b20c1)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 30 00:22:58 UTC 2024 (revision r12-10588-gae5bf1a308f)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 30 00:00:28 UTC 2024 (revision
5a419c22e67:3f543d8a121:378f50f4c32af5111893989bfc5a191d3aa27bb7)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 16 01:31:14 UTC 2024 (revision r15-1353-gdff55a5a0e1)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 16 01:08:26 UTC 2024 (revision r13-8851-g663be6b995f)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 16 00:45:34 UTC 2024 (revision r13-8851-g663be6b995f)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 16 00:22:50 UTC 2024 (revision r12-10559-g573a5f33152)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 16 00:00:16 UTC 2024 (revision
08ee05b43a7:3ef077fba72:87abb9e4d9bb71a3e5257f418dd936db0b9a3fa5)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 2 01:31:26 UTC 2024 (revision r15-970-g3c7301f947e)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 2 01:08:41 UTC 2024 (revision r13-8818-g6634ff0f61b)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 2 00:46:00 UTC 2024 (revision r13-8818-g6634ff0f61b)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 2 00:23:19 UTC 2024 (revision r12-10483-g26fa081ad4b)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 2 00:00:30 UTC 2024 (revision
4b4c849d095:81ae8b1b9d8:9b792e0159f7076e5901972be751333006e2ea83)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 19 01:31:24 UTC 2024 (revision r15-647-ga6114c2a691)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 19 01:08:31 UTC 2024 (revision r13-8777-g162c441c946)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 19 00:45:33 UTC 2024 (revision r13-8777-g162c441c946)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 19 00:22:54 UTC 2024 (revision r12-10458-g65e5547e546)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 19 00:00:23 UTC 2024 (revision
dde786aa4ea:3884987b630:b5348964bdd1b710a624111c04816410b1de5b9e)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 5 01:08:26 UTC 2024 (revision r15-166-gffb521f157f)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 5 00:45:52 UTC 2024 (revision r13-8687-gaf51c73b16b)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 5 00:23:12 UTC 2024 (revision r12-10412-g1e5d35c963e)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun May 5 00:00:31 UTC 2024 (revision
f7bcc355d06:6df48ede213:bfb79239bfca6b1aa6be3721c32b70a9aeb91b44)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 21 01:08:10 UTC 2024 (revision r14-10055-ga7d01a71518)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 21 00:45:27 UTC 2024 (revision r13-8622-g0b85540ec42)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 21 00:22:54 UTC 2024 (revision r12-10366-ga6fa5387a3a)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 21 00:00:20 UTC 2024 (revision
269f70ca232:c899c06e5b0:a1baeeaf038e37b96b4565a58534be924c9ca601)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114606
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
: Fri Apr 5 12:37:19 2024 -0400
target: missing -Whardened with -fcf-protection=none [PR114606]
-Whardened warns when -fhardened couldn't enable a hardening option
because that option was disabled on the command line, e.g.:
$ ./cc1plus -quiet g.C -fhardened -O2 -fstack-protector
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8b148bc22673689fda19711b428b544462be2e4
commit r14-9903-gb8b148bc22673689fda19711b428b544462be2e4
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Fri Apr 5 12:37:19 2024 -0400
target: missing -Whardened with -fcf-protection=none [PR114606]
-Whardened warns when -fhardened
s -quiet g.C -fhardened -O2 -fstack-protector
> cc1plus: warning: '-fstack-protector-strong' is not enabled by '-fhardened'
> because it was specified on the command line [-Whardened]
>
> but it doesn't work as expected with -fcf-protection=none:
>
> $ ./cc1plus -quiet g.C -fhard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96265
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 111937 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
-none on |offloading to nvptx-none
|aarch64-linux-gnu |from aarch64-linux-gnu (and
||riscv*-linux-gnu) does not
||work
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Confirmed.
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 7 01:08:08 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9823-g4e3c8257304)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 7 00:45:26 UTC 2024 (revision r13-8591-g045de0ab586)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 7 00:22:52 UTC 2024 (revision r12-10313-g0611f480013)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Apr 7 00:00:16 UTC 2024 (revision
f203ded5492:9eb6572ada4:b755a7af1f2ef1f5348d04db20f751e898abcd9d)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
d line [-Whardened]
> >
> > but it doesn't work as expected with -fcf-protection=none:
> >
> > $ ./cc1plus -quiet g.C -fhardened -O2 -fcf-protection=none
> >
> > because we're checking == CF_NONE which doesn't distinguish between nothing
> > and -fcf-pro
> $ ./cc1plus -quiet g.C -fhardened -O2 -fstack-protector
> cc1plus: warning: '-fstack-protector-strong' is not enabled by '-fhardened'
> because it was specified on the command line [-Whardened]
>
> but it doesn't work as expected with -fcf-protection=none:
>
> $ ./cc1plus
tor-strong' is not enabled by '-fhardened'
because it was specified on the command line [-Whardened]
but it doesn't work as expected with -fcf-protection=none:
$ ./cc1plus -quiet g.C -fhardened -O2 -fcf-protection=none
because we're checking == CF_NONE which doesn't distinguish between nothing
and -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114606
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114606
Bug ID: 114606
Summary: -Whardened doesn't trigger with -fcf-protection=none
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 24 02:08:16 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9649-gbb04a11418f)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 24 01:45:33 UTC 2024 (revision r13-8493-g2012d1a6949)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 24 01:22:54 UTC 2024 (revision r12-10290-gd6adcfce936)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Mar 24 01:00:23 UTC 2024 (revision
eb1926bf94e:7de8d5a3623:289e41a3a7da91ca4305becf67f00f5f2cacb6d2)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114421
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 93041 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114421
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #6 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114421
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/memory_model#Forward_progress is a
decent reference when it comes to what it means by forward progress in C++.
Note C and C++ have slightly different requirements.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114421
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
>I can't see anything and when run natively on the x86_64 (and -m32 x86)
The behavior changed in GCC 10+, so if you are testing using anything before
GCC 9, you would see the difference. Because on x86_64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114421
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114421
--- Comment #2 from Earle F. Philhower, III
---
Thanks very much for the fast explanation. For reference of others who might
hit this, I see references to C11 6.8.5 pp 6 online (but of course it's an ISO
document so not freely available).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114421
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114421
Bug ID: 114421
Summary: arm-none-eabi thumb -Os (and -O2) incorrectly
optimizes out needed class member call
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c5037fcee2de438774466e78e46e6ab4df72a7fe
commit r14-9446-gc5037fcee2de438774466e78e46e6ab4df72a7fe
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: Wed Mar 13 09:35:28 2024 +0100
OpenMP/Fortran: Fix defaultmap(none) issue with dummy procedures [PR114283]
Dummy procedures look
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Mar 12 18:57:31 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9442-g81ee1298b47)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests
than the _host-device_, through a
function pointer (C/C++), a pointer to a member function (C++), a dummy
procedure (Fortran), or a procedure pointer (Fortran) that refers to the
host version of the _procedure_."
OpenMP/Fortran: Fix defaultmap(none) issue with dummy procedures [PR1142
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:07:46AM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Using dummy procedures in a target region with 'defaultmap(none)' leads to:
>
> Error: 'g' not specified in enclosing 'target'
>
> and this cannot be fixed by using 'firstprivate' as non-pointer dummy routines
Using dummy procedures in a target region with 'defaultmap(none)' leads to:
Error: 'g' not specified in enclosing 'target'
and this cannot be fixed by using 'firstprivate' as non-pointer dummy routines
are rejected as "Error: Object 'g' is not a variable".
Fixed by doing the same f
On 2024-03-01 15:58, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 19/02/2024 09:13, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
Ok for trunk and releases/gcc-13?
Regtested on top of 945cb8490cb for arm-none-eabi, without any regression.
Backporting to releases/gcc-13 will change -std=c23 to -std=c2x.
Jakub has just
On 19/02/2024 09:13, Torbjörn SVENSSON wrote:
> Ok for trunk and releases/gcc-13?
> Regtested on top of 945cb8490cb for arm-none-eabi, without any regression.
>
> Backporting to releases/gcc-13 will change -std=c23 to -std=c2x.
Jakub has just pushed a different fix for this, so I do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114174
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Prachi Godbole from comment #0)
> In the meanwhile are there any workarounds? e.g. if for a particular march,
> if poly_int can be expressed using 1 coefficient or -msve-vector-bits=128 is
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96265
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pgodbole at nvidia dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114174
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114174
Bug ID: 114174
Summary: [aarch64] Offloading to nvptx-none
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 1:14 AM Torbjörn SVENSSON
wrote:
>
> Ok for trunk and releases/gcc-13?
> Regtested on top of 945cb8490cb for arm-none-eabi, without any regression.
>
> Backporting to releases/gcc-13 will change -std=c23 to -std=c2x.
>
Ok for trunk and releases/gcc-13?
Regtested on top of 945cb8490cb for arm-none-eabi, without any regression.
Backporting to releases/gcc-13 will change -std=c23 to -std=c2x.
--
In commit 4fe34cdcc80ac225b80670eabc38ac5e31ce8a5a, -std=c23 support was
introduced to support functions without any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106849
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113323
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113323
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113323
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a2d66158541c0923620b044098bf66a73b51c463
commit r14-7180-ga2d66158541c0923620b044098bf66a73b51c463
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113322
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113322
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a2be4e155992151b60fca6969a97d6efd91e82b5
commit r14-7149-ga2be4e155992151b60fca6969a97d6efd91e82b5
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113323
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113322
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113323
Bug ID: 113323
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected none of vector_type, have
vector_type in bitint_precision_kind, at
gimple-lower-bitint.cc:131 with _BitInt()
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113322
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
`-O3 -g0 -march=sapphirerapids`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113322
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-01-11
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113322
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113322
Bug ID: 113322
Summary: [14 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check:
expected none of vector_type, have vector_type in
expand_single_bit_test, at expr.cc:13375
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113155
--- Comment #6 from Sergey Kirdyankin ---
bin>arm-none-eabi-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=arm-none-eabi-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=C:/work/distributiv/arm-gnu-toolchain-13.2/bin/../libexec/gcc/arm-none-eabi/13.2.1/lto-wrapper.exe
Tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113155
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Again how did you configure gcc because that changes which libgcc is being used
and with what options?
Also I suspect you should just be using -march=armv7e-m+fp instead.
Provide the output of:
`arm-none
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113155
--- Comment #4 from Sergey Kirdyankin ---
Compiler command line (platform configure):
arm-none-eabi-gcc -march=armv7e-m -mcpu=cortex-m4 -mfloat-abi=hard
-mfpu=fpv4-sp-d16 -mthumb ...
Disassembler:
080016c0 <__aeabi_f2ulz>:
80016c0:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113155
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you provide the following:
* How you configured/built GCC?
* What command line options that you pass to GCC for building your application?
I am suspecting you are not using the correct options to get
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113155
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113155
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I looked into the sources of libgcc, __aeabi_f2ulz is defined as __fixunssfdi
which is defined in soft-fp/fixunssfdi.c and that does:
```
UDItype
__fixunssfdi (SFtype a)
{
FP_DECL_EX;
FP_DECL_S (A);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113155
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113155
Bug ID: 113155
Summary: large overhead for cast float to uint64_t. Arm
cortex-m4 (ARMv7E-M, fpv4-sp-d16, ieee 754). Compiler:
arm-none-eabi-gcc
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79792
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112622
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112622
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b7a1b89e60c4b492f85b47e02c12b01dd8a6e28b
commit r14-5625-gb7a1b89e60c4b492f85b47e02c12b01dd8a6e28b
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112622
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112622
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112622
Bug ID: 112622
Summary: [14 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected none of
vector_type, have vector_type in convert_to_real_1, at
convert.cc:295 with invalid cast
Product
1 - 100 of 1580 matches
Mail list logo
