On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:09:49AM +1200, Danny Smith wrote:
Revised patch.
Thanks Danny!
Tested on i686-pc-mingw32
Danny
cp/ChangeLog
PR target/27650
* class.c (check_for_override): Remove dllimport from virtual
methods.
testsuite/Changelog
PR
Danny Smith wrote:
cp/ChangeLog
PR target/27650
* class.c (check_for_override): Remove dllimport from virtual
methods.
testsuite/Changelog
PR target/27650
* g++.dg/ext/dllimport12.C: New file.
OK, thanks.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
[EMAIL
From: Mark Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 3:38 PM
Danny Smith wrote:
The problem I had was with the second case below. We don't
know if a
method is implicitly virtual until search.c:look_for_overrides_r).
Would t be better to unset
Is any of you able to give some comments on pr27650
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27650
In particular I am interested in an opinion of Danny's fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg01504.html
I definately don't know enough about attributes and dllimport to
comment.
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
Is any of you able to give some comments on pr27650
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27650
In particular I am interested in an opinion of Danny's fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg01504.html
I definately don't know enough about attributes and
From: Mark Mitchell
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
Is any of you able to give some comments on pr27650
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27650
In particular I am interested in an opinion of Danny's fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg01504.html
The
Danny Smith wrote:
The problem I had was with the second case below. We don't know if a
method is implicitly virtual
until search.c:look_for_overrides_r). Would t be better to unset
DECL_DLLIMPORT_P (and remove the attribute as well) there?
Ah, right, good point. I always forget that
