Since it is possible to use the 0b prefix
to specify a binary number in GCC/C++,
will there be any resistance to add %b
format specifier to the printf family format
strings?
Best regards
Piotr Wyderski
On 01/22/2010 12:01 PM, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
Since it is possible to use the 0b prefix
to specify a binary number in GCC/C++,
will there be any resistance to add %b
format specifier to the printf family format
strings?
This has absolutely nothing to do with GCC and its development, you
Paolo Carlini wrote:
This has absolutely nothing to do with GCC and its development, you
understand.
You sure? Isn't the implementation of printf formatting engine a part
of GCC support libraries and doesn't adding an extension to it
belong to the category development?
On 01/22/2010 12:31 PM, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
You sure? Isn't the implementation of printf formatting engine a part
of GCC support libraries
The C library, to which library printf belongs, is not part of the GCC
project.
Paolo.
Paolo Carlini wrote:
The C library, to which library printf belongs, is not part of the GCC
project.
In that case it certainly isn't a GCC issue.
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
Paolo Carlini wrote:
The C library, to which library printf belongs, is not part of the GCC
project.
In that case it certainly isn't a GCC issue.
Assuming this feature is accepted in glibc, you'll want to update GCC's
-Wformat flag.
Since it is possible to use the 0b prefix to specify a binary
number in GCC/C++, will there be any resistance to add %b format
specifier to the printf family format strings?
You can do that yourself by using the hook facility for printf, see
(libc) Customizing Printf in the GNU C library
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
Since it is possible to use the 0b prefix to specify a binary
number in GCC/C++, will there be any resistance to add %b format
specifier to the printf family format strings?
You can do that yourself by using the hook facility for printf, see
(libc)
