On Sun, 2021-06-13 at 19:11 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote:
>
>
> > On 08-Jun-2021, at 11:24 PM, David Malcolm
> > wrote:
> >
> > Is there a URL for your branch?
>
> no, currently it only local branch on my machine. Should I upload it on
> a hosting site ( like GitHub ) ? or can I create a branch
> On 08-Jun-2021, at 11:24 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> Is there a URL for your branch?
no, currently it only local branch on my machine. Should I upload it on a
hosting site ( like GitHub ) ? or can I create a branch on remote also ?
> The issue is that the analyzer currently divides
On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 21:20 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote:
>
>
> > On 01-Jun-2021, at 6:38 PM, David Malcolm
> > wrote:
> >
[...snip...]
> > Maybe it's best to have an
> > account on the GCC compile farm for this:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm
> > IIRC you already have such an
> On 01-Jun-2021, at 6:38 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> - able to build the analyzer from source *quickly*, for hacking on the
> code. i.e. with --disable-bootstrap. We want to minimize the time it
> takes to, say, hack in a print statement into a single .cc file in the
> analyzer
On Sun, 2021-05-30 at 20:38 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote:
> hello
Hi Ankur, sorry about the delayed reply (it was a long weekend here in
the US)
> I was successfully able to build gcc with bootstrapping disabled and
> using xgcc directly from the build directory instead ( reducing the
> overall
hello
I was successfully able to build gcc with bootstrapping disabled and using xgcc
directly from the build directory instead ( reducing the overall build time a
lot, although it still takes about half an hour to build but it’s much faster
than before ). Also I was also able to run one
