On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, BELBACHIR Selim wrote:
>
> > In fact my final purpose is to replace $INP by a register bank
> > in order to be able to read several inputs using pipelined
> > instructions (and instruction scheduler). The fixed reg solution
> > w
Message d'origine-
> De : Ian Lance Taylor [mailto:i...@google.com]
> Envoyé : jeudi 19 janvier 2012 00:17
> À : BELBACHIR Selim
> Cc : gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Objet : Re: readonly register
>
> BELBACHIR Selim writes:
>
> > I'm trying to support an 'in'
m]
> Envoyé : jeudi 19 janvier 2012 00:17
> À : BELBACHIR Selim
> Cc : gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Objet : Re: readonly register
>
> BELBACHIR Selim writes:
>
>> I'm trying to support an 'in' instruction which reads a value on a
>> peripheral and writes it into a $INP
pass without
turning them into fixed register ?
Selim
-Message d'origine-
De : Ian Lance Taylor [mailto:i...@google.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 19 janvier 2012 00:17
À : BELBACHIR Selim
Cc : gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Objet : Re: readonly register
BELBACHIR Selim writes:
> I'm trying to s
BELBACHIR Selim writes:
> I'm trying to support an 'in' instruction which reads a value on a peripheral
> and writes it into a $INP register.
> The $INP register can be used in almost every insn as input operand (add,
> sub, mul ...).
> I defined a builting to access the 'in' instruction.
>
> H
Hi,
I'm trying to support an 'in' instruction which reads a value on a peripheral
and writes it into a $INP register.
The $INP register can be used in almost every insn as input operand (add, sub,
mul ...).
I defined a builting to access the 'in' instruction.
How should I express to gcc that th
