Hello All,
Some middle-end passes (those declared in tree-passes.h) are still unnamed.
I tend to believe that it would be helpful (mostly for gcc debugging
purposes) that every struct opt_pass (without exception) should be
uniquely named (and that this should be enforced, eg. in
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 31, 2008, at 1:11, Basile STARYNKEVITCH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
Some middle-end passes (those declared in tree-passes.h) are still
unnamed.
I tend to believe that it would be helpful (mostly for gcc debugging
purposes) that every struct
Andrew Thomas Pinski wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
Except as a habit (which I think is a bad one) is there any reason to
have anonymous passes (those with a null pass-name), or (I don't know
if such beast exists) homonym passes (two different passes with equal
pass-name)?
Yes. To prevent a
Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
Andrew Thomas Pinski wrote:
Except as a habit (which I think is a bad one) is there any reason to
have anonymous passes (those with a null pass-name), or (I don't
know if such beast exists) homonym passes (two different passes with
equal pass-name)?
Yes. To
