Re: sparc-rtems recent test regressions

2011-02-08 Thread Jeff Law
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/07/11 12:47, Joel Sherrill wrote: On 02/07/2011 01:46 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 02/07/11 11:51, Joel Sherrill wrote: On 02/07/2011 09:32 AM, Jeff Law wrote: On 02/02/11 07:19, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi, In the past few days, something has

Re: sparc-rtems recent test regressions

2011-02-08 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 02/08/2011 09:34 AM, Jeff Law wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/07/11 12:47, Joel Sherrill wrote: On 02/07/2011 01:46 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 02/07/11 11:51, Joel Sherrill wrote: On 02/07/2011 09:32 AM, Jeff Law wrote: On 02/02/11 07:19, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi,

Re: sparc-rtems recent test regressions

2011-02-08 Thread Jeff Law
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/08/11 08:43, Joel Sherrill wrote: What's the best way to test the sparc-rtems target? Do you use a sim? I've got access to sparcs via the gcc buildfarm, but that's about it. We use the sis/erc32 simulator in gdb. You have to build

Re: sparc-rtems recent test regressions

2011-02-07 Thread Jeff Law
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/02/11 07:19, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi, In the past few days, something has regressed on the sparc. Revision 169143 only had 699 failures and ~100 of those were LTO related. David Korn's patch seems to have resolved those. Revision 169504

Re: sparc-rtems recent test regressions

2011-02-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 02/07/2011 09:32 AM, Jeff Law wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/02/11 07:19, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi, In the past few days, something has regressed on the sparc. Revision 169143 only had 699 failures and ~100 of those were LTO related. David Korn's patch seems to

Re: sparc-rtems recent test regressions

2011-02-07 Thread Jeff Law
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/07/11 11:51, Joel Sherrill wrote: On 02/07/2011 09:32 AM, Jeff Law wrote: On 02/02/11 07:19, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi, In the past few days, something has regressed on the sparc. Revision 169143 only had 699 failures and ~100 of those were

Re: sparc-rtems recent test regressions

2011-02-07 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 02/07/2011 01:46 PM, Jeff Law wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/07/11 11:51, Joel Sherrill wrote: On 02/07/2011 09:32 AM, Jeff Law wrote: On 02/02/11 07:19, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi, In the past few days, something has regressed on the sparc. Revision 169143 only

sparc-rtems recent test regressions

2011-02-02 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi, In the past few days, something has regressed on the sparc. Revision 169143 only had 699 failures and ~100 of those were LTO related. David Korn's patch seems to have resolved those. Revision 169504 has 2231 failures.

Re: sparc-rtems recent test regressions

2011-02-02 Thread Jeff Law
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/02/11 07:19, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi, In the past few days, something has regressed on the sparc. Revision 169143 only had 699 failures and ~100 of those were LTO related. David Korn's patch seems to have resolved those. Revision 169504