On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Steve White
stevan.wh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I run some tests of simple number-crunching loops whenever new
architectures and compilers arise.
These tests on recent Intel architectures show similar performance
between gcc and icc compilers, at full
Hi Richard!
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Steve White
stevan.wh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I run some tests of simple number-crunching loops whenever new
architectures and compilers arise.
These tests
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Steve White stevan.wh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Richard!
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Steve White
stevan.wh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I run some tests of simple
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Steve White stevan.wh...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi Richard!
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:31 AM,
Hi,
I run some tests of simple number-crunching loops whenever new
architectures and compilers arise.
These tests on recent Intel architectures show similar performance
between gcc and icc compilers, at full optimization.
However a recent test on x86_64 showed the open64 compiler
outstripping