Re: targetm.init_builtins and build_common_builtin_nodes ordering

2011-02-07 Thread Mike Stump
On Feb 7, 2011, at 2:51 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > I would say add a new hook that can be called from build_common_builtin_nodes > instead. Ok, thanks.

Re: targetm.init_builtins and build_common_builtin_nodes ordering

2011-02-07 Thread Jack Howarth
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 11:51:55AM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Mike Stump wrote: > > So, in c-common.c we have: > > > >  targetm.init_builtins (); > >  build_common_builtin_nodes (); > > > > and in f95-1.c we have: > > > >  build_common_builtin_nodes (); > >  t

Re: targetm.init_builtins and build_common_builtin_nodes ordering

2011-02-07 Thread Richard Guenther
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Mike Stump wrote: > So, in c-common.c we have: > >  targetm.init_builtins (); >  build_common_builtin_nodes (); > > and in f95-1.c we have: > >  build_common_builtin_nodes (); >  targetm.init_builtins (); They are "unordered", thus, targetm.init_builtins is suppose

targetm.init_builtins and build_common_builtin_nodes ordering

2011-02-06 Thread Mike Stump
So, in c-common.c we have: targetm.init_builtins (); build_common_builtin_nodes (); and in f95-1.c we have: build_common_builtin_nodes (); targetm.init_builtins (); I would like to change c-common.c to match fortran, so that the target hook can slightly alter (rename) the linkage name