Daniel Jacobowitz dixit:
>> >Geoff> Does anyone mind if I update libtool to the latest released
>> >version,
>> >Geoff> 1.5.18, and regenerate everything with automake 1.9.5?
>> >
>> >If everyone agrees to go forward with this
>>
>> Oh, I should have said: "and if you don't mind, how do yo
On Sunday, July 3, 2005, at 03:28 PM, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Of these, only newlib actually uses libtool, so it's the last holdout
for
switching to newer libtool.
Hopefully we ask the newlib maintainers for a timeline for conversion...
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>If you want to update libtool, you get to play the all-of-src-uses-it
>game. I have been updating src directories to more recent autoconf
>versions in the hope of getting rid of our outdated libtool someday. I
>believe the only remaining holdout is newlib, but I didn't ch
On Jun 30, 2005, Geoff Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone mind if I update libtool to the latest released version,
> 1.5.18, and regenerate everything with automake 1.9.5?
I'm pretty sure the latest released version would introduce some
regressions for features that we added to the
On 01/07/2005, at 7:43 AM, Kelley Cook wrote:
Does anyone mind if I update libtool to the latest released
version, 1.5.18, and regenerate everything with automake 1.9.5?
Sounds great if you can get it to work.
I actually have this completely working for the GCC part of the tree,
I thi
[ please Cc: me ]
Hi Geoff,
* Geoff Keating wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 03:37:07AM CEST:
> On 30/06/2005, at 6:26 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>
> >Geoff> Does anyone mind if I update libtool to the latest released version,
> >Geoff> 1.5.18, and regenerate everything with automake 1.9.5?
> >
> >
Does anyone mind if I update libtool to the latest released version,
1.5.18, and regenerate everything with automake 1.9.5?
Sounds great if you can get it to work.
I had experimented with doing it earlier in the year, before Paolo completely redid the
libjava Makefile.am to compile directorie
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 07:17:24PM -0700, Geoff Keating wrote:
> OK. I don't want to update newlib to current tools; that would take
> too long and I don't have the ability to test the result. Nor am I
> very enthusiastic about updating, for instance, gdb.
GDB doesn't use libtool, and now us
On 30/06/2005, at 6:41 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 06:37:07PM -0700, Geoff Keating wrote:
On 30/06/2005, at 6:26 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
Geoff Keating writes:
Geoff> Does anyone mind if I update libtool to the latest released
version,
Geoff> 1.5.18, and regen
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 06:37:07PM -0700, Geoff Keating wrote:
>
> On 30/06/2005, at 6:26 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>
> >>Geoff Keating writes:
> >>
> >
> >Geoff> Does anyone mind if I update libtool to the latest released
> >version,
> >Geoff> 1.5.18, and regenerate everything with aut
On 30/06/2005, at 6:26 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
Geoff Keating writes:
Geoff> Does anyone mind if I update libtool to the latest released
version,
Geoff> 1.5.18, and regenerate everything with automake 1.9.5?
If everyone agrees to go forward with this
Oh, I should have said: "and
> Geoff Keating writes:
Geoff> Does anyone mind if I update libtool to the latest released version,
Geoff> 1.5.18, and regenerate everything with automake 1.9.5?
If everyone agrees to go forward with this, please work with Mark
to schedule a freeze on all other GCC development so th
Does anyone mind if I update libtool to the latest released version,
1.5.18, and regenerate everything with automake 1.9.5?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
13 matches
Mail list logo
