On 03/06/2020 16:58, alan buckley wrote:
Chris,
I think you�re right it looks like I was dividing it down to seconds,
not centi-seconds.
Have you tried my updated code (with the correct number of zeros) in
your version of the GCCSDK and does it fix your original problem?
I've tried it wi
.uk>
Sent: 03 June 2020 15:49
To: gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info<mailto:gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info>
Subject: Re: [gccsdk] [GCCSDK commit] lee - r7304 - in
trunk/gcc4/recipe/files/gcc/libunixlib: . unix
I think you have too many zeros - I believe it should be:
end = now + timeout-&
I think you have too many zeros - I believe it should be:
end = now + timeout->tv_sec * 100 + (timeout->tv_usec+) /
1;
Cheers
Chris
On 09/05/2020 17:44, alan buckley wrote:
I don’t think this commit is correct. I checked the definition of
select on Linux and it says the
I don’t think this commit is correct. I checked the definition of select on
Linux and it says the time is in microseconds and it should round up to the
next clock update frequency. The original isn’t correct either.
I don’t know what the frequency is on RISC OS, but if it’s to a centi-second
yo
