Re: [gccsdk] Development priorities and suggestions

2008-03-04 Thread Adam
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Naulls wrote: > Adam wrote: > > [snip: GDB] > My belief is that GDB, as a command line application would probably > be straight forward - you'd have to import the libbfd changes > from our binutils and perhaps some other stuff, but it's not > overly difficult.

Re: [gccsdk] Development priorities and suggestions

2008-03-03 Thread John Tytgat
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Peter Naulls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My belief is that GDB, as a command line application would probably > be straight forward - you'd have to import the libbfd changes > from our binutils and perhaps some other stuff, but it's not > overly difficult.

Re: [gccsdk] Development priorities and suggestions

2008-03-03 Thread Peter Naulls
Adam wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Naulls wrote: > >> Rather, this is aimed at the obvious GCCSDK using developers and >> potentially those who might. My goal here is to get more people >> involved and make it easier for those who already are. > > Sounds great :) > > >> So th

Re: [gccsdk] Development priorities and suggestions

2008-03-03 Thread Adam
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Naulls wrote: > Rather, this is aimed at the obvious GCCSDK using developers and > potentially those who might. My goal here is to get more people > involved and make it easier for those who already are. Sounds great :) > So the question is, what would yo

[gccsdk] Development priorities and suggestions

2008-03-02 Thread Peter Naulls
Sorry, this isn't an open ended question regarding what users would like to see on RISC OS ;-) Rather, this is aimed at the obvious GCCSDK using developers and potentially those who might. My goal here is to get more people involved and make it easier for those who already are. So the question