Re: [gccsdk] Syslog: DoggySoft vs. Unix

2008-12-19 Thread John Tytgat
In message <5ce92fe94e.ad...@snowstone.org.uk> Adam wrote: > Here's a stab at a "non-linear" scheme: > > 0 <-> # Unix scheme doesn't account for armageddon! > 10 <-> # ... or war > 20 <-> Emergency > 30 <-> Alert > 40 <-> Critical# Paraphrase: "critica

Re: [gccsdk] Syslog: DoggySoft vs. Unix

2008-03-03 Thread John Tytgat
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did anything come of this? Not that I'm aware of. A conversion from BSD syslog values to RISC OS / DoggySoft values seems to me the most reasonable approach. > I don't have the facilities to test Select remote logging.

Re: [gccsdk] Syslog: DoggySoft vs. Unix

2008-03-03 Thread Adam
I don't really want to try and summarise this whole (old) thread, though it seems some of the archives are incomplete. Graham suggested 3 solutions, but: http://www.riscos.info/pipermail/gcc/2007-May/003844.html I'll put together a "digest" of it if anyone's interested. In message <[EMAIL PROTEC