[Bug c++/18670] g++ is allowing defaulted parameters in function definition in a weird way

2004-11-24 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-25 04:59 --- Yes this is standard C++, the bug is invalid. To attach files, you first need to create the bug, then you open it in your browser and click on the create new attachment link. --

[Bug rtl-optimization/18237] [4.0 regression] ICE in gen_lowpart_general, at rtlhooks.c:58

2004-11-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-25 05:13 --- RTH, I think this regression is caused by one of your recent patches for subregisters. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug regression/18643] [3.4 Regression] fixincludes breaks RTEMS

2004-11-24 Thread corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-25 05:43 --- Patches applied to gcc-3_4-branch and CVS-trunk. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/18237] [4.0 regression] ICE in gen_lowpart_general, at rtlhooks.c:58

2004-11-24 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-25 07:38 --- You *do* realize that the current problem has absolutely nothing to do with the original report, don't you? You *do* realize that rewriting a PR like this is pointless, and you should file a *new* PR to cover

[Bug c/18671] New: Structure with bit-field offset is wrong.

2004-11-24 Thread nitins2 at kpitcummins dot com
Hi, I am using tool chain built with gcc-3.4-20040813 snapshot. The structure offset byte is wrong for the following C-source code with - mrenesas option. Without -mrenesas option it gives correct offset that is 4. The data b2 of structure bbb offset is comming 8 which is wrong, it should be 4.

<    1   2   3