[Bug bootstrap/18142] "Unknown pseudo-op: .machine" compiling darwin-crt2.c

--- Additional Comments From bothner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 06:33 --- I consider the bug fixed now that configure gives a useful error message telling people to get a fixed cctools. Though with one reservation: 18627 comment #2 reports problems with installing the new cctools

[Bug bootstrap/18142] "Unknown pseudo-op: .machine" compiling darwin-crt2.c

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 06:06 --- Subject: Bug 18142 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-28 06:06:29 Modified files: gcc: configure.ac configure ChangeLog Lo

[Bug c++/17011] [3.4/4.0 regression] invalid default parameter diagnosed too late

--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 06:03 --- Under investigation. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu

[Bug c++/17971] [3.4/4.0 regression] Invalid default parameter not diagnosed.

--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 06:03 --- Under investigate. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |l

[Bug target/17224] [3.4/4.0 Regression]: relocation truncated to fit: GPREL22

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 05:57 --- You *do* realize this test case is completely undefined, don't you? Even "&n-1" is undefined; see 6.5.6/8. I suppose I could reject symbol+constant where constant is outside the size of the object, but at some

[Bug c++/7874] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] g++ finds friend functions defined in class-definition but not declared in the enclosing namespace

--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 05:38 --- Got a solution for friend class, but not friend function yet. The tough part is the need to look at interaction between hidden friend and hidden built-in functions. Likely postponed to 4.1. -- http://

[Bug rtl-optimization/16613] [3.4 Regression] compile time regression, when adding cerr usage

--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 05:27 --- Confirmed. GCC 4.0 doesn't have this problem. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UN

[Bug c/18700] Infinite loop with ranged for() loop

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 05:27 --- In C, ((int)INT_MAX) + 1 is undefined and int does not wrap. For 3.4.0 and above if you want int to wrap use the flap -fwrapv. Otherwise use unsigned where wrapping is defined. -- What|Rem

[Bug c/18700] New: Infinite loop with ranged for() loop

the code: void foo() { int i; for (i = 0; i <= 0x7fff; i++) ; } compiled with "-O -S" procudes the following assembly. foo: pushl %ebp movl%esp, %ebp .L2: jmp .L2 -- Summary: Infinite loop with ranged for() loop

[Bug libgcj/18699] [4.0 Regression] SIGSEGV in GC_local_gcj_malloc

--- Additional Comments From ovidr at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-11-28 04:20 --- And this.. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 1113430960 (LWP 4763)] 0x405e8f93 in really_start (x=0x8771a40) at /datal/gcc/gcc/libjava/posix-threads.cc:396 39

[Bug libgcj/18699] [4.0 Regression] SIGSEGV in GC_local_gcj_malloc

-- What|Removed |Added Component|java|libgcj Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1869

[Bug java/18699] New: [4.0 Regression] SIGSEGV in GC_local_gcj_malloc

I have upgraded to gcc version 4.0.0 20041127 (experimental) and my app now receives this: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 1103858608 (LWP 4735)] GC_local_gcj_malloc (bytes=20, ptr_to_struct_containing_descr=0x86d1848) at /datal/gcc/gcc/boehm-gc

[Bug target/17224] [3.4/4.0 Regression]: relocation truncated to fit: GPREL22

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-11-28 02:58 --- I have verified that this patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-04/msg00598.html is the cause. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug ada/18691] 105 acats failure due to ICE in gnat_to_gnu_entity, at ada/decl.c:286

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 02:44 --- Confirmed, Kenner has a fix though, hopefully he got my saying it was fixed with it. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug web/18241] [4.0 Regression] linux kernel loop gets miscompiled

--- Additional Comments From ak at muc dot de 2004-11-28 01:33 --- Hmm, the oops was in the test before the second loop, but idx is in the second loop. But maybe I misread it. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/18241] [4.0 Regression] linux kernel loop gets miscompiled

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 01:28 --- Confirmed, this looks like a jump threading bug. Before we have: goto (); :; D.7815_42 = pathp_2->node; tag_43 = tag_27; idx_44 = idx_6; D.7819_45 = D.7815_42->tags[tag_43][idx_44]; if (D.7819_

[Bug tree-optimization/18241] [4.0 Regression] linux kernel loop gets miscompiled

--- Additional Comments From ak at muc dot de 2004-11-28 01:21 --- When I comment out the first pass_dominator in tree-optimize.c and compile with -O1 it works too. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18241

[Bug tree-optimization/18241] [4.0 Regression] linux kernel loop gets miscompiled

--- Additional Comments From ak at muc dot de 2004-11-28 01:05 --- -O1 -fno-tree-dominator-opts seems to avoid the problem -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18241

[Bug fortran/16222] non-integral DO loop variables are unsupported.

--- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2004-11-28 00:56 --- See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2004-11/msg00224.html for a fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16222

[Bug preprocessor/15220] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] "gcc -E -MM -MG" reports missing system headers in source directory

--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2004-11-28 00:50 --- Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] "gcc -E -MM -MG" reports missing system headers in source directory neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:- > > --- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot

[Bug c++/18698] [3.4/4.0 regression] Error message using "using" for code not using "using" ;-)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 00:48 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug c++/18698] New: [3.4/4.0 regression] Error message using "using" for code not using "using" ;-)

The following invalid code snippet causes a strange error message: === template struct A { ::A~(); }; === bug.cc:3: error: using-declaration for non-member at class scope ^ bug.cc:3: error:

[Bug target/18665] [3.4/4.0 Regression] -ftrapv borks up simple integer arithmetic

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 00:34 --- Here's the difference between what gcc 3.3.3 produces and what gcc 4.0.0 manages to make of it (first 3.3.3, second 4.0.0): 16,18c16,20 < movl-8(%rbp), %esi < movl-4(%rbp), %edi <

[Bug target/18665] [3.4/4.0 Regression] -ftrapv borks up simple integer arithmetic

-- What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.0 Regression] -ftrapv|[3.4/4.0 Regression] -ftrapv |borks up simple integer |borks up simple integer

[Bug target/18665] [4.0 Regression] -ftrapv borks up simple integer arithmetic

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 00:31 --- Works with SuSE 3.3.3. -- What|Removed |Added Known to fail|

[Bug target/18665] -ftrapv borks up simple integer arithmetic

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 00:26 --- Honza, looks like we're not setting up the libcall right in the -ftrapv case. Can you with all your RTL and amd64-fu give this a look? -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/18665] -ftrapv borks up simple integer arithmetic

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 00:22 --- Much simpler test case: $ cat t.c extern int printf (__const char *__restrict __format, ...); int __attribute__ ((__noinline__)) foo (int a, int b) { return a - b; } int main (void) { pri

[Bug tree-optimization/18241] [4.0 Regression] linux kernel loop gets miscompiled

--- Additional Comments From ak at muc dot de 2004-11-28 00:17 --- Tried -fno-tree-ch. Didn't help. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18241

[Bug java/18697] [4.0 Regression] Miscompilation of GtkMenuItemPeer.setParent(MenuItem)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 00:09 --- Reopening. -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRME

[Bug java/18697] Miscompilation of GtkMenuItemPeer.setParent(MenuItem)

--- Additional Comments From mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 00:08 --- *** Bug 18696 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18697

[Bug libfortran/18364] endfile does not truncate file

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 00:07 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug java/18696] [4.0 Regression] Miscompilation of GtkMenuItemPeer.setParent(MenuItem)

--- Additional Comments From mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 00:07 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18697 *** -- What|Removed |Added S

[Bug target/16800] PowerPC - Unnecessary rldicl

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 00:07 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/18665] -ftrapv borks up simple integer arithmetic

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 00:07 --- I can reproduce this on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with "GNU C version 4.0.0 20041127 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)" -- What|Removed

[Bug java/18696] [4.0 Regression] Miscompilation of GtkMenuItemPeer.setParent(MenuItem)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 00:05 --- *** Bug 18697 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18696

[Bug java/18697] Miscompilation of GtkMenuItemPeer.setParent(MenuItem)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-28 00:05 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18696 *** *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18696 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug java/18697] New: Miscompilation of GtkMenuItemPeer.setParent(MenuItem)

tly the same why before and after the gui-branch-merge-patch in the trunk. It fails in the same way on i686-pc-linux-gnu and powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu (both configured with --enable-java-awt=gtk,xlib) gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.0.0 20041127 (experimental) The following rewrite of the m

[Bug java/18696] [4.0 Regression] Miscompilation of GtkMenuItemPeer.setParent(MenuItem)

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Summary|Miscompilation of |[4.0 Regression] |GtkMenuItemPeer

[Bug java/18696] New: Miscompilation of GtkMenuItemPeer.setParent(MenuItem)

tly the same why before and after the gui-branch-merge-patch in the trunk. It fails in the same way on i686-pc-linux-gnu and powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu (both configured with --enable-java-awt=gtk,xlib) gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.0.0 20041127 (experimental) The following rewrite of the m

[Bug libfortran/18364] endfile does not truncate file

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 23:36 --- Subject: Bug 18364 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-27 23:35:47 Modified files: libgfortran: ChangeLog libgfortran/io : e

[Bug preprocessor/15220] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] "gcc -E -MM -MG" reports missing system headers in source directory

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 23:18 --- Ow. The dependencies are emitted in open_file_failed in libcpp/files.c; but that routine *doesn't know* whether the file was called for in a <> or a "" directive. Fixing this requires some restructurin

[Bug tree-optimization/18241] [4.0 Regression] linux kernel loop gets miscompiled

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 23:07 --- Can you try with -fno-tree-ch (or -Os)? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18241

[Bug target/16800] PowerPC - Unnecessary rldicl

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 23:01 --- Subject: Bug 16800 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-27 23:01:00 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/rs6000:

[Bug target/16343] invalid code when using -meabi -msdata=eabi

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-11-27 22:58 --- Fixed -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/16343] invalid code when using -meabi -msdata=eabi

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 22:57 --- Subject: Bug 16343 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-27 22:57:12 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug tree-optimization/18694] [4.0 regression] loop miscompilation at -O1 (-ftree-loop-ch)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 22:56 --- Confirmed, I don't know if this is fully a tree loop copy header (-ftree-loop-ch) bug or just something it does changes something else. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/18694] [4.0 regression] loop miscompilation at -O1

--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2004-11-27 22:53 --- Created an attachment (id=7619) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7619&action=view) Test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18694

[Bug target/16343] invalid code when using -meabi -msdata=eabi

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 22:51 --- Subject: Bug 16343 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-27 22:51:45 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/rs6000:

[Bug preprocessor/17610] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Empty #include statement halts gcc

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 22:50 --- I took this. Patch is at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg02423. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/18694] New: [4.0 regression] loop miscompilation at -O1

[forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/280972] gcc version 4.0.0 20041127 (experimental) % gcc div.c && ./a.out 1 2 4 8 5 10 20 40 25 50 100 200 125 250 500 1000 % gcc -O1 div.c && ./a.out zsh: segmentation fault (core dumped) ./a.out The original reporter says he gets bogu

[Bug libstdc++/18644] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] -Wsynth warning in

--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2004-11-27 21:27 --- Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] -Wsynth warning in "bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Why are we getting this warning anyway? I don't know why we're getting that warn

[Bug tree-optimization/18693] ivopts regression metabug

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 21:22 --- As I wrote in PR 18040, that bug is not caused by IV-OPTS really but SRA producing invalid gimple. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18693

[Bug tree-optimization/18040] [4.0 Regression] ICE in for_each_index, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:178

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 21:20 --- Even though this ICE is caused by IV-OPTS, it has nothing to do with IV-OPTS, IVOPTS is finding invalid gimple which is produced by SRA because of handled_component_p. -- What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/18693] ivopts regression metabug

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|18040 | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18693

[Bug tree-optimization/18048] [4.0 Regression] mgrid loop performance regression with ivopts

-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||18693 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18048

[Bug tree-optimization/17474] [4.0 Regression] Compiling at -01 yields different results

-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||18693 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17474

[Bug middle-end/17549] [4.0 Regression] 35% increase in codesize with C code

-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||18693 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17549

[Bug tree-optimization/18219] [4.0 Regression] gcc-4.0.0 bloats code by 31%

-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||18693 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18219

[Bug tree-optimization/18040] [4.0 Regression] ICE in for_each_index, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:178

-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||18693 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18040

[Bug tree-optimization/17790] [4.0 Regression] Significant compile time increases for sixtrack with tree LICM and IV optimization

-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||18693 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17790

[Bug tree-optimization/18595] [4.0 Regression] IV-OPTS is O(N^3)

-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||18693 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18595

[Bug tree-optimization/18693] New: ivopts regression metabug

For counting purposes. -- Summary: ivopts regression metabug Product: gcc Version: 3.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: meta-bug Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: u

[Bug ada/18692] Ada should have a dg testsuite

--- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 20:53 --- The following is a list of gcc bugs with ada testcases that are not in any testsuite. 10899 12450 The following are bugs that should have test cases, but the test case in the bug may not be the best way t

[Bug rtl-optimization/17387] Redundant instructions in loop optimization

-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-11-27 20:49:43 date|

[Bug middle-end/17982] [4.0 regression] asm declaration ignored due to conflict with previous rename

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-11-27 20:44 --- DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME_SET_P alone is not very reliable to check if a symbol has been renamed or not. There are /* The name of the object as the assembler will see it (but before any translations made by ASM_OUTPUT_LA

[Bug tree-optimization/17454] [4.0 Regression] ICE with --enable-checking=fold

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 20:36 --- Can you try again? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17454

[Bug tree-optimization/17679] [4.0 Regression] Aliasing problem with ivopts

--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 20:32 --- The code in find_base_value very likely is not entirely OK, but I do not know about a way how it could cause problems with just the currently used optimizations. Since this code will disappear once we sta

[Bug preprocessor/17610] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Empty #include statement halts gcc

-- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2004-09-22 21:18:20 |2004-11-27 20:30:41 date|

[Bug libstdc++/18690] tr1/utility is broken on darwin

--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-11-27 20:27 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Res

[Bug preprocessor/16621] [4.0 Regression] C4x fails miserably

--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-11-27 20:25 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] C4x fails miserably I have no plans to do anything about this bug. Someone who cares about C4x should look at it. zw -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16621

[Bug libstdc++/18690] tr1/utility is broken on darwin

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 20:25 --- Subject: Bug 18690 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-27 20:25:11 Modified files: libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog libstdc++-v3/inclu

[Bug middle-end/17982] [4.0 regression] asm declaration ignored due to conflict with previous rename

--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2004-11-27 20:25 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] asm declaration ignored due to conflict with previous rename That's not what HJ's patch does, though. zw -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17982

[Bug other/7257] [3.4/4.0 regression] -O3 -fverbose-asm does not display -flag-inline-functions

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-27 20:15 --- This is the patch taht fixed it in mainline: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-11/msg01182.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7257

[Bug preprocessor/16621] [4.0 Regression] C4x fails miserably

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 20:14 --- Yes I did verify it was fixed: [zhivago:gcc/objdir-c4x/gcc] pinskia% cat t.c int i[2]; [zhivago:gcc/objdir-c4x/gcc] pinskia% ./cc1 -version t.c GNU C version 4.0.0 20041126 (experimental) (c4x-unknown-elf)

[Bug preprocessor/16621] [4.0 Regression] C4x fails miserably

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-27 20:13 --- Reopening until someone builds a C4x compiler and test it first-hand. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug preprocessor/16621] [4.0 Regression] C4x fails miserably

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 20:10 --- Have you actually verified that this is fixed? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16621

[Bug tree-optimization/17679] [4.0 Regression] Aliasing problem with ivopts

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-27 20:09 --- Zdenek, can you check if this bug still makes sense or close it if it does not reproduce anymore? You are the one that knows if there is still an underlying problem to fix or not. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/

[Bug libstdc++/18690] tr1/utility is broken on darwin

--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-11-27 20:03 --- Thanks Andrew, I will commit the obvious fix (_I -> _Int). -- What|Removed |Added AssignedT

[Bug target/18630] can't find a register in class `GENERAL_REGS' when trying to make Firefox 1.0

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 19:58 --- So this is fixed with 3.4.0 so closing. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING

[Bug ada/17666] Ada tests hanging during make check

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 19:55 --- I have the same problem with c94002f and c974012 on ppc-darwin These are the following which "hang" for me on ppc-darwin: c37402a c94002f c94002g c953002 c954020 c954021 c954022 c954023 c954024 c954026 c974

[Bug rtl-optimization/15537] [3.4/4.0? Regression] GCC 3.4.0 release (vanilla, no patches applied) miscompiles splay library

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 19:50 --- No feedback in 3 months. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING

[Bug objc/18408] [4.0 Regression] ICE compiling code that involves casting classes

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 19:46 --- This should not be in waiting (waiting is mainly to get information from the reporter and not other developers). -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/18692] Ada should have a dg testsuite

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 19:34 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancemen

[Bug ada/18692] New: Ada should have a dg testsuite

The only public testsuite for gnat is acats which unfortunatly doesn't use the normal GCC testsuite harness so it is harder to add tests too and doesn't have a timeout right now. An initial patch is at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg01862.html, unfortunatly a change to libgloss.exp

[Bug libfortran/18364] endfile does not truncate file

--- Additional Comments From bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 19:31 --- proposed patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2004-11/msg00218.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/18691] New: 105 acats failure due to ICE in gnat_to_gnu_entity, at ada/decl.c:286

ERS => null; end; end; +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.0.0 20041127 (experimental) (powerpc-apple-darwin7.6.0) GCC error: | | in gnat_to_gnu_entity, at ada/decl.c:286 | | Error detected at pp2.adb

[Bug tree-optimization/18662] [4.0 Regression] ACATS ICE c97114a verify_stmts failed / Statement marked for throw, but doesn't

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 19:20 --- Analysis of the problem and maybe a patch: . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18662

[Bug preprocessor/16621] [4.0 Regression] C4x fails miserably

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 19:15 --- But again ways this is now fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug preprocessor/16621] [4.0 Regression] C4x fails miserably

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 19:13 --- Yes libcpp still uses HOST_WIDE_INT: include/cpplib.h:typedef unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT cpp_num_part; plus we use cpp_num_part all over the place in libcpp. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1

[Bug tree-optimization/18687] [4.0 Regression] ~50% compile time regression

--- Additional Comments From belyshev at lubercy dot com 2004-11-27 18:44 --- Created an attachment (id=7618) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7618&action=view) perl script (463 bytes) Use this script to get more accurate timings. (install http://search.cpan.org/~jhi/

[Bug preprocessor/16621] [4.0 Regression] C4x fails miserably

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 18:44 --- libcpp no longer uses HOST_WIDE_INT. The computation which leads to the error is done in c-decl.c in "target arithmetic" as follows: /* Compute the maximum valid index, that is, si

[Bug ada/18660] ACATS spurious front-end error c432003.adb:134:21: too few discriminants given in constraint

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 18:43 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug middle-end/18493] [3.4 Regression] gcc doesn't like switch blocks without case/default labels

--- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2004-11-27 18:40 --- Patch here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg02309.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18493

[Bug target/18019] [4.0 Regression] -march=pentium4 generates word fetch instead of byte fetch

--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 18:28 --- I suggest excising the TARGET_PARTIAL clauses ASAP, and reinstating them only when alignment checking (and/or something else) is used in them to verify that the transform is safe. That seems to be the mos

[Bug c++/18674] [3.4/4.0 Regression] G++ accepts bad elaborated type specifiers

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug c++/18512] [3.4/4.0 Regression] ICE on invalid usage of template base class

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug target/18034] GCC 3.4.2/GNAT bootstrap problem

--- Additional Comments From franke at euro-telematik dot de 2004-11-27 17:25 --- Subject: Re: GCC 3.4.2/GNAT bootstrap problem -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Try looking into PR 6552 and PR 6669. Those two might tell you > what the problem is. It might be stage1

[Bug c++/18368] [3.4/4.0 Regression] C++ error message regression

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/18577] [3.3 regression] variable use moved before initialization

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 17:05 --- See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg02385.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/18577] [3.3 regression] variable use moved before initialization

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-27 16:59 --- Subject: Bug 18577 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_3-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-27 16:59:18 Modified files: gcc: Change

  1   2   >