--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15
12:41 ---
Anyone working on this?
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15
12:39 ---
Why is this a middle-end bug? Is this not target-specific?
Anyone working on fixes?
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15
12:37 ---
SSE bug -> rth
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15
12:29 ---
Test case???
There are many other problems with delete_trivially_dead_insns, unsurprisingly,
so maybe the whole thing should be revisited and reconsidered :-/
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15
12:33 ---
Set to front-end bug based on observations by the reporter (as opposed to wild
guessing by someone else...)
--
What|Removed |Added
---
Mainline's C++ frontend warns about the following code snippet:
==
int i=-1;
unsigned int j= ~0;
==
warn.cc:2: warning: converting of negative value '-0x1' to
'unsigned int'
The strange thing is that the warning disappears if I comment out the
unre
--- Additional Comments From baldrick at free dot fr 2005-01-15 12:27
---
Subject: Re: ACATS CXA4009, CXA4020 - valgrind detects bad code (overlapping
memcpy)
> Confirmed, the problem is in gimplify_modify_expr_to_memcpy (but this is not
> a regression even
> though this is a middle
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15
12:25 ---
You'd almost think Andrew is not a native speaker.
What I think he asks is: "Can the patch that caused this be done in a different
way such that the code is still correct but the compile time regression goes
--- Additional Comments From debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2005-01-15 12:00 ---
started a new build ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615
--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15
11:09 ---
Technically illagal, so removing rejects-valid keyword.
IFC is not a particularly good judge of whether code is legal ;-)
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15
10:51 ---
Any news on this, Matthias?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15
10:50 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-01/msg00665.html
--
What|Removed |Added
I'm aware of PR13470, although this seems like another issue, using gcc-3.3.5 or
gcc-3.4.3 as bootstrap compiler, the build fails in stage3. Seen with CVS HEAD
20050110.
Matthias
stage2/xgcc -Bstage2/ -B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/alpha-linux-gnu/bin/ -c -O2
-gnatpg -gnata -I- -I. -Iada -
I..
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15
09:46 ---
Subject: Bug 19060
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-15 09:46:10
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog fold-const.c tree-ssa-dom.c
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15
08:48 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-01-15 08:34
---
All mauve testcase regarding java.text.CollationElementIterator pass now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9613
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15
08:24 ---
Hmm, The only thing I can think of is moving this warning to the tree level
before we do any
optimization.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19058
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ssemmx
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17415
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15
08:17 ---
To fix the compiling C++/C example use the following code:
typedef float V2SF __attribute__((mode(V2SF)));
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15
08:08 ---
Confirmed, changing the summary a little more.
Also if the file contained anything, we seg fault when finishing the write
(which seems wrong).
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15
08:11 ---
Subject: Bug 18983
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-15 08:10:24
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
libgfortran/io : t
101 - 121 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
