--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-01-19 08:17
---
This functionality is missing after FP compares rewrite:
==i386_old.md==
...
;; We can't represent the LT test directly. Do this by swapping the operands.
(define_split
[(set (match_operand:SF 0
during bootstrap the compiler warns:
../../../libgfortran/generated/matmul_l4.c:102: warning: 'astride' is used
uninitialized in this function
../../../libgfortran/generated/matmul_l4.c:109: warning: 'bstride' is used
uninitialized in this function
The new flat layout of the multilibed libgcc_s shared library in the build tree
has broken in-tree multilib testing on IRIX and Solaris because there are now
multiple shared objects with the same soname in the same directory.
Richard Sandiford's analysis for IRIX and plausible kludge:
BUG REPORTS HAVE TO CONTAIN AT LEAST THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IN ORDER TO BE
USEFUL:
the exact version of GCC, as shown by gcc -v;
gcc -v
Reading specs from C:/languages/MinGW/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/3.4.2/specs
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --with-gcc --with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as --
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at redhat dot com,
||zack at codesourcery dot com
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-01-19 09:09
---
Does this behaviour seem a little bit unusual to you? You said: You
cannot create a basic_stringchar object in memory aligned one.
That is rather counter-intuitive to a user of libstdc++ who has no
--- Additional Comments From stevenb at novell dot com 2005-01-19 09:12
---
Subject: Re: DSE is not doing its job for global variables
Do you happen to have numbers on how many dead stores the RTL dead
store elimination (in flow.c, right) catches?
--
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
09:27 ---
Subject: Bug 19164
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-19 09:27:24
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog c-typeck.c gimplify.c
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
09:27 ---
Subject: Bug 17297
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-19 09:27:24
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog c-typeck.c gimplify.c
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
09:31 ---
Subject: Bug 15139
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-19 09:31:16
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog Makefile.in combine.c
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 09:34
---
Reopening PR, as the report supposedly referred to in comment #9
was with native tools (/usr/ccs/bin something).
I hope to close this PR in a day or two pending a bootstrap with gas+ld.
--
What
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
09:45 ---
Subject: Bug 17297
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-19 09:44:49
Modified files:
gcc:
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
09:45 ---
Subject: Bug 19164
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-19 09:44:49
Modified files:
gcc:
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 09:49
---
Fixed in CVS.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
installing with DESTDIR set to a temporary installation directory, the
installation fails when relinking libgij. The failure is hidden, if libgcj can
be found elsewhere on the system.
Matthias
libtool: install: warning: relinking `libgij.la'
(cd
Today's (2005-01-19) gcc trunk does not build for sh-rtems*:
...
make[1]: Entering directory
`/users/rtems/src/rpms/BUILD/rtems-4.7-sh-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib-gcc4.0.0newlib1.13.0/build/gcc'
gcc -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.4 |3.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19164
--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
09:55 ---
At the risk of stating the obvious, I think this is wider than just
Solaris and IRIX. Build-directory testing is broken for similarly-
organised *-linux-gnu configurations too. I think it's less likely
RTEMS is relying on the set of multilibs having been used by default before
gcc-4.0.0, i.e.
# sh-rtems-gcc --print-multi-lib
.;
ml;@ml
m2;@m2
m3e;@m3e
m4-single-only;@m4-single-only
m4-single;@m4-single
m4;@m4
ml/m2;@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ml/m3e;@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ml/m4-single-only;@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-01-19 10:05
---
Well, I can see that basic_string default allocator, std::allocatorCharT
according to the standard shall return memory only aligned as CharT requests,
not more; whereas our implementation of std::allocator
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
10:13 ---
Confirmed by Richard.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
11:18 ---
Subject: Bug 15139
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-19 11:18:20
Modified files:
gcc:
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 11:21
---
Fixed in CVS.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-01-19 11:51
---
For 4.0, besides the documentation issue, I think we should change
ext/array_allocator to use tr1::type_traits::aligned_storage, finally
available. I will post a patch ASAP...
--
What|Removed
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
12:21 ---
I am not even going to try and look surprised, the SH port is a major
abuser of the middle-end. But of course, hard_regs_intersect_p should
have been in hard-reg-set.h from the start, *sigh*,
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
12:26 ---
...and remove the #include ra.h of course.
Paolo, you should also update doc/passes.texi, which also still
has references to new-ra.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From coudert at clipper dot ens dot fr 2005-01-19
12:37 ---
As this bug is blocking some of my code, I did some testing of the patch
provided in comment #2. Bootstrapped and no additional regression on
sparc-sun-solaris2.9. It fixes the testcase all right.
--- Additional Comments From coudert at clipper dot ens dot fr 2005-01-19
12:38 ---
I tested the patch from comment #8. Bootstrapped and regtested on
sparc-sun-solaris2.9. This fixes the intrinsic_transpose.f90 failure all right.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19294
--- Additional Comments From bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2005-01-19 12:40
---
Created an attachment (id=7990)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7990action=view)
test case as a file attachment, as requested
also triggered by this compiler:
--- Additional Comments From paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch
2005-01-19 12:55 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] missing ra.h
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
12:26 ---
...and remove the
--- Additional Comments From ch at csh-consult dot dk 2005-01-19 13:06
---
Does this mean that there is a limit to how many files you can compile at a
time (due to limited memory)? Can't the garbage collector run between each
compilation?
--
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
13:27 ---
I've fixed the doc/passes.texi (commit in progress).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19528
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
13:47 ---
Steven, building cc1 to sh-unknown-elf with your patch succeeded.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19528
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
13:57 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Does this mean that there is a limit to how many files you can compile at a
time (due to limited memory)? Can't the garbage collector run between each
compilation?
Yes for
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
14:01 ---
To me it looks like a libtool bug but I could be wrong.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19527
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|bootstrap |target
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
--
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19529
--
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19528
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
14:30 ---
Subject: Bug 19375
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-19 14:30:24
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog semantics.c
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
14:46 ---
Subject: Bug 19258
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-19 14:46:35
Modified files:
gcc/cp :
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
14:47 ---
Fixed in 3.4 branch.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
14:50 ---
Subject: Bug 19375
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-19 14:50:27
Modified files:
gcc/cp :
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
14:51 ---
Fixed in 3.4 branch and mainline.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
When I compile this code :
#include mmintrin.h
__m64 moo(int i) {
__m64 tmp = _mm_cvtsi32_si64(i);
return tmp;
}
With (GCC) 4.0.0 20050116 like so:
gcc -O3 -S -mmmx moo.c
I get this (without the function pop/push etc)
movd12(%ebp), %mm0
movq%mm0, (%eax)
However,
--- Additional Comments From guardia at sympatico dot ca 2005-01-19 14:59
---
Created an attachment (id=7991)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7991action=view)
gcc -O3 -S -msse moo.c --save-temps
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19530
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
Keywords||missed-optimization, ssemmx
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|regression |target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19530
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
15:07 ---
Hmm, looking at the rtl dumps this looks like the register allocator sucks as
the sse register is picked in
the -msse but in the -mmmx, only the mmx register is picked. Someone needs to
take an axe to
--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
15:17 ---
Testing a patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
RVO is performed on a temporary object that is declared volatile.
That seems contradictory with the ISO standards 12.8 15 (object and copy must
have the same cv-unqualified type).
With the following piece of code, I was excepting the copy constructor and
destructor to be called.
struct String
{
Note that do_pending_inlines has been removed with
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-12/msg01574.html
However, cp/pt.c still mentions do_pending_inlines like so
/* Returns 1 if processing DECL as part of do_pending_inlines
needs us to push template parms. */
static int
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
15:38 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
15:39 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-01-19 15:51 ---
Proposed patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg01223.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-19 15:57 ---
Subject: Re: basic_string::_M_rep() can produce an unnaturally aligned pointer
to _Rep
pcarlini at suse dot de [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Does this behaviour seem a little bit unusual to you?
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-01-19 16:02 ---
Subject: Re: basic_string::_M_rep() can produce an unnaturally aligned pointer
to _Rep
pcarlini at suse dot de [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Well, I can see that basic_string default allocator,
--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2005-01-19 16:22 ---
Subject: Re: DSE is not doing its job for
global variables
On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 09:12 +, stevenb at novell dot com wrote:
--- Additional Comments From stevenb at novell dot com 2005-01-19 09:12
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
16:35 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Steven, building cc1 to sh-unknown-elf with your patch succeeded.
Building sh-rtems4.7 with Steven's patch also succeeds.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19528
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
16:41 ---
Subject: Bug 19462
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-19 16:39:27
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog reorg.c
Log message:
In the headers from gcc for Windows, the file commdlg.h doesn't contain
START_PAGE_GENERAL's constant.
(use with the structure PRINTDLGEX -
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Win32 API START_PAGE_GENERAL|START_PAGE_GENERAL
|constant not exists |
I build gcc from the actual snapshot gcc-4.0-20050116.
When I compile boost_1_32_0 I get an ICE when I execute the self tests:
Michael Cieslinski
g++ -c -o bienstman1.o bienstman1.ii
/home/cie019/boost/boost_1_32_0/boost/python/detail/destroy.hpp: In static
member function 'static void
--- Additional Comments From micis at gmx dot de 2005-01-19 16:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=7992)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7992action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19534
--- Additional Comments From janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2005-01-19
17:04 ---
Mark, your response addresses the original message but not the later ones, and
not either of the attached test cases. In those the class is:
class bc {
public:
char m1 :17;
};
m1 is assigned a value of
In tr1/utility:
template
struct __pair_get1
{
templatetypename _Tp1, typename _Tp2
static _Tp1 __get(std::pair_Tp1, _Tp2 __pair)
{ return __pair.second; }
templatetypename _Tp1, typename _Tp2
static const _Tp1 __const_get(const std::pair_Tp1, _Tp2 __pair)
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
17:04 ---
Subject: Bug 19462
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-19 17:04:25
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
--- Additional Comments From peturr02 at ru dot is 2005-01-19 17:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=7993)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7993action=view)
Test case
Compiling this fails with:
g++0116 -Wall -static 1.cc -o 1
--- Additional Comments From stuart at apple dot com 2005-01-19 17:08
---
So the bug is the end stab without the start stab?
Yes.
Or do you think that this
bit of code that corresponds not at all to any user code should have full
stabs?
My personal preference is a mild yes. But
I build gcc from the actual snapshot gcc-4.0-20050116.
When I compile boost_1_32_0 I get an ICE when I execute the self tests.
This ICE only occurs if I use the -g option.
Michael Cieslinski
g++ -g -c -o current_function_test.o current_function_test.ii
--- Additional Comments From micis at gmx dot de 2005-01-19 17:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=7994)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7994action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19536
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19 17:18
---
All committed to main trunk.
(May reopen for branches.)
--
What|Removed |Added
This does not appear to be the same as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14436.
binutils 2.15, gcc from CVS as or 2005-01-19.
This should be reproducible in any other tic4x target.
./gcc/configure --target=tic4x-rtems4.7 --enable-threads=rtems
--prefix=/opt/rtems-test --with-gnu-as
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:24 ---
Tru64 is not a primary or secondary platform; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:32 ---
MMIX is not a primary or secondary target; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:38 ---
Not a gcc bug, report this either to cygwin or mygwin as they provide the
headers.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:39 ---
*** Bug 19534 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:38 ---
I already reduced this, this is a dup of bug 19299.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19299 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:41 ---
This is a dup of bug 19367 which is already reduced.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19367 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:41 ---
*** Bug 19536 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:43 ---
SH is not a primary or secondary target; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:45 ---
This option is only designed for use in debugging the compiler. As it's not
designed for use by end-users, I've removed the target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:47 ---
MMIX is not a primary or secondary platform; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:47 ---
MMIX is not a primary or secondary platform; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:47 ---
MMIX is not a primary or secondary platform; removing target milestone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:52 ---
Ada and Java bugs are not release-critical; therefore, I've removed the target
milsetone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:51 ---
Ada and Java bugs are not release-critical; therefore, I've removed the target
milsetone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:52 ---
Ada and Java bugs are not release-critical; therefore, I've removed the target
milsetone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:52 ---
Ada and Java bugs are not release-critical; therefore, I've removed the target
milsetone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:52 ---
Ada and Java bugs are not release-critical; therefore, I've removed the target
milsetone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:52 ---
Ada and Java bugs are not release-critical; therefore, I've removed the target
milsetone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:59 ---
Good. Ralf, can you post it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19528
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
19:24 ---
Mark, can we keep known wrong-code bugs targeted for 4.0 please? Java/Ada
or other languages shouldn't make a difference for wrong code bugs. They
are the most serious kind we have.
--
--- Additional Comments From leehod at il dot ibm dot com 2005-01-19 19:28
---
There is now a patch addressing these issues.
See: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg01247.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18441
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
19:32 ---
I just to be able to reproduce this all the time too but lately (in the last
two months) I have not been
able to so closing as fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From andreev at comm dot mot dot com 2005-01-19
19:33 ---
There is no config.log file in libstdc++ directory. And I have
target's /usr/lib and /usr/include directories in location specified by --with-
sysroot
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
19:36 ---
This config.log:
./i686-pc-solaris2.8/libstdc++-v3/config.log
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19492
--- Additional Comments From andreev at comm dot mot dot com 2005-01-19
19:38 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
This config.log:
./i686-pc-solaris2.8/libstdc++-v3/config.log
Andrew, there is no such file, look at comment #2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19492
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
