Running
/sources/gcc-4.0-20050130/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/builtins.exp
...
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strlen-3.c compilation, -O1
--
Summary: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strlen-3.c compilation,
-O1
Product: gcc
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC host triplet||i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20001
WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p10769a.C compilation failed to produce
executable
--
Summary: p10769a.C compilation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: c++
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC host triplet||i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20002
Running
/sources/gcc-4.0-20050130/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.cth/cthfrags.exp ...
FAIL: libmudflap.cth/pass40-frag.c execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.cthh/pass40-frag.c output pattern test
FAIL: libmudflap.cth/pass40-frag.c (-O2) execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.cth/pass40-frag.c (-O2)
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
Component|libstdc++ |libmudflap
Output from g++ -v:
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2.3/specs
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix
--disable-checking --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit
--- Additional Comments From behrisch at informatik dot hu-berlin dot de
2005-02-16 09:41 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
From: Pete Gontier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
09:52 ---
With PR15791 fixed we now create at -O2
void foo() ()
{
struct Foo * const this.6;
struct Foo * D.1654;
struct Foo * const this;
register struct Foo * D.1634;
struct Foo[2] * D.1633;
struct
On all fortran compilers I could test, the following does what is expected (that
is, pressing the enter key prints well done). gfortran waits for a non-newline
character:
program testRead
implicit none
character(1) resp
write (*,'('' hit return: '',$)')
read (*,'(a)') resp
write (*,'('' well
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-02-16 10:58
---
That test is accessing str_lit01 beyond its end, I'm fixing it.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
11:10 ---
Subject: Bug 19829
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-16 11:09:58
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
11:13 ---
Subject: Bug 19829
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-16 11:12:44
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 :
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-02-16 11:16
---
Fixed for 4.0 and 3.4.4.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-16 11:16
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] build broken on
several targets due to recent 'DC' type update to libgcc2
From: corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While building, I noticed warnings from math
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-16 11:47
---
(In reply to comment #3)
One more note from me on this bug forever.
Most people don't use parameter names in prototypes to make sure that this
confussion does not
happen.
Actually, most people do use
Using the $ character in a write format is a commonly-implemented extension to
imply non-advancing output; it is, however, not part of any Fortran standard
(f90 and later standards offer an alternative method to achieve the same aim).
However, gfortran currently accepts it without complaint.
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16 12:31
---
Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00923.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2005-02-16 12:32
---
However, gfortran currently accepts it without complaint.
However, in general, this can only be found at runtime (also with NAG f95):
program testRead
implicit none
character(len=19) fmt
character(1) resp
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-16 12:36
---
(In reply to comment #4)
To be more clear (independant of what most may or may not do, or rely upon), as
within the body
of a function definition, given that parameters are referanced by their
symbolic name,
--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2005-02-16
12:41 ---
I think I have identified the problem.
The hang itself is probably caused by a Lapack bug, because slarrb is
only fed 0. and NaN as arguments.
The reason why this is so is probably due to a problem in
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-02-16
13:35 ---
Subject: Re: warn on parameter name mismatch
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, cyeoh at samba dot org wrote:
I think it would be fairly unusual that you would want the prototype parameter
names to not match the
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
13:54 ---
Subject: Bug 19857
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-16 13:54:31
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog convert.c fold-const.c
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16 13:58
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--
Bug 19858 depends on bug 19857, which changed state.
Bug 19857 Summary: [4.0 Regression] alignment check of SSE constant fails in
simple test program
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19857
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
14:14 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18491 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
14:14 ---
*** Bug 20002 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18491
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
14:15 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19670 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
14:15 ---
*** Bug 20001 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
# gcc -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -fno-common
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H-I. -I. -I../../gcc-4.0.0/gcc -I../../gcc-4.0.0/gcc/.
-I../../gcc-4.0.0/gcc/../include -I../../gcc-4.0.0/gcc/../libcpp/include \
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
14:28 ---
Confirmed in 3.2.3 and 3.3.3 but fixed already in 3.4.0 but this is a
regression from 3.0.4.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20007
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|error: too many arguments to|[4.0 Regression] error: too
|function `find_basic_blocks |many arguments to function
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
14:43 ---
: Search converges between 2004-02-01-trunk (#445) and 2004-03-01-trunk (#446).
: Search converges between 2004-02-02-3.4 (#1) and 2004-03-01-3.4 (#2).
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
14:49 ---
Actually this is a much older regression than what I had orginally thought.
The asm produced changed between 20040201 and 20040301.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19988
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
14:51 ---
Ok, this is the patch which caused this code generation regression:
2004-02-07 Roger Sayle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* fold-const.c (negate_expr_p, negate_expr): Optimize -(A+B) into
either
--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2005-02-16 14:56
---
Confirmed.
ip2k seems to have the same problem.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
14:59 ---
This has been failing since at least 2000-12-31.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19565
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
15:02 ---
: Search converges between 2004-02-01-trunk (#445) and 2004-03-01-trunk (#446).
: Search converges between 2004-03-01-3.4 (#2) and 2004-03-15-3.4 (#3).
--
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
15:15 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
From: corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While building, I noticed warnings from math code in newlib, I haven't
noticed before. I am not sure whether these
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-02-16 15:16
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ice / gnat bug detected.
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Is that what you want?
Yes, thanks. I can now reproduce this on my ppc box with your reduced
test case. I'll
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
15:27 ---
: Search converges between 2004-07-29-trunk (#498) and 2004-07-30-trunk (#499).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19878
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
15:29 ---
The behavior changed between 20030722 and 20030724.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
15:30 ---
Subject: Bug 20007
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-16 15:30:27
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
gcc/config/ip2k:
--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2005-02-16 15:32
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
15:33 ---
I think this was caused by:
2003-07-22 Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eliminate use of POINTER_TYPE for pointers-to-members.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20007
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
15:34 ---
I think this was caused by:
2004-07-29 Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* cp-tree.h (IDENTIFIER_REPO_CHOSEN): Define.
.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19878
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
15:39 ---
Subject: Bug 19967
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-16 15:39:31
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog builtins.c
--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2005-02-16 15:41
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
15:43 ---
For anyone else who might be confused by the references to attachment 561, the
link in nathan's posting was probably broken in the conversion from gnats to
bugzilla. The gnats attachment id was 561, whereas
--- Additional Comments From tow21 at cam dot ac dot uk 2005-02-16 15:44
---
(In reply to comment #1)
However, gfortran currently accepts it without complaint.
However, in general, this can only be found at runtime (also with NAG f95):
[snip example]
Of course, you're
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-16 15:56
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] build broken on
several targets due to recent 'DC' type update to libgcc2
Like ...?
Here's one (target: h8300-rtems4.7):
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16 16:08
---
Looking into it.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub
++/3.4.3
--enable-languages=c,c++,java,f95 --enable-java-awt=gtk --host=i386-redhat-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.0 20050216 (Red Hat 4.0.0-0.24)
---
/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/SRC680_m77/xmlsecurity/source/xmlsec/nss/securityenvironment_nssimpl.cxx:756:
internal compiler error: in expand_case
--- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat dot com 2005-02-16 16:23
---
Created an attachment (id=8203)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8203action=view)
bzip2 compressed preprocesser output
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20008
--- Additional Comments From quanah at stanford dot edu 2005-02-16 16:28
---
I disagree that this is a duplicate of 18033.
I applied the following patch to gcc-3.4.3:
--- gcc-3.4.3/config-ml.in.orig 2005-02-15 21:37:41.0 -0800
+++ gcc-3.4.3/config-ml.in 2005-02-15
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
16:30 ---
4.0.0 20050216 says:
error: ISO C++ forbids initialization in array new
--
What|Removed |Added
With LAST_UPDATED: Wed Feb 16 04:21:14 UTC 2005, these tests succeeded.
With LAST_UPDATED: Wed Feb 16 14:53:35 UTC 2005 they fail:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/USIcmp.c, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/USIcmp.c, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/USIcmp.c, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL:
It appears that the *arm_extendqisi pattern never match anything for
reasons I can't find. This means that on ARMv4 and ARMv5, this code:
int foo(signed char *x) { return *x; }
produces:
ldrbr0, [r0, #4]
mov r0, r0, asl #24
mov r0, r0, asr #24
mov
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Summary|internal compiler error: in |[4.0 Regression] internal
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16 16:58
---
Actually, I do see problems in the tree dumps already.
Particularly the trees look ok before LIM and are broken afterwards.
loopinit-lim pseudo diff:
L97:;
D.16409_250 =
--- Additional Comments From quanah at stanford dot edu 2005-02-16 17:02
---
never mind, i forgot to run autoconf to regenerate configure after applying the
patch.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18033 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From quanah at stanford dot edu 2005-02-16 17:02
---
*** Bug 19995 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18033
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
17:27 ---
Getting a warning to be issued is easy: initialize_ref may print it if it finds
that the call to convert_like will create a temporary, testing
conv-need_temporary_p. However, this would trigger warnings for
Hello, the new support of two-stage name-lookup for templates in gcc 3.4.0 for
C++ brings a problem that
I don't know how to resolve.
I would like to know what is your recommended way of dealing with the following.
Here is some code that used to compile and link on gcc 3.3 (sorry to copy some
--- Additional Comments From jmoro at latentzero dot com 2005-02-16 18:06
---
Created an attachment (id=8204)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8204action=view)
source code and *.ii files
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20011
Hello,
when I compile this:
procedure Test2
is
Number : Integer := 2;
pragma Compile_Time_Warning
(Number 1, NUmber Is GReater Than 1!);
begin
null;
end;
with gcc version 3.4.3:
gcc -c test2.adb
I get this warning:
test2.adb:6:10: warning: number Is greater Than 1
Sourc code for t.cpp:
struct X
{
int i;
};
int mymain()
{
X x = { 1 };
int X::*pm = X::i;
if (x.*(+pm) == 0)
return 0;
}
Trying to call BufferedImage.getGraphics() aborts on my Linux system.
Tested with both in gcc-4.0-20050130 snapshot and a fresh CVS checkout of
gcc-gui-branch-20050128 as of 20050209. I have recommended/current versions
of all dependencies including cairo-0.30.
Testcase attached. Using gij with
--- Additional Comments From hendrich at informatik dot uni-hamburg dot de
2005-02-16 18:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=8205)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8205action=view)
testcase
jfig-gcc/jfig gij PR20014
-I- started...
-I- got a buffered image: [EMAIL
--- Additional Comments From berndtrog at yahoo dot com 2005-02-16 18:27
---
Nathanael,
do you know why the rts gets compiled here? (the avr target does not have a rts)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From berndtrog at yahoo dot com 2005-02-16 18:39
---
gcc version 4.0.0 20050215 and gcc-3.4.3 have this bug, too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10671
Showing a JMenu works. However, clicking outside the JMenu to close the
menu does not - the JMenu patiently stays open until one of its JMenuItems
is selected (clicked).
For compatibility with the JDK/JRE and all major GUI environments, a
JMenu should close when the user clicks the inside the
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
18:50 ---
Fixed in 3.4.0 and above.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From hendrich at informatik dot uni-hamburg dot de
2005-02-16 18:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=8206)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8206action=view)
testcase
Compile and run, then select a JMenu. The JMenu stays open until one of its
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
18:52 ---
The easy way to fix this is to make the template function not be in the class
definition.
Anyways if you read a good C++ book, this would be explained there.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
18:59 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Actually, I do see problems in the tree dumps already.
Particularly the trees look ok before LIM and are broken afterwards.
loopinit-lim pseudo diff:
Can you look into the vops
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20008
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
19:01 ---
Subject: Bug 19521
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-16 19:01:29
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog dbxout.c
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
19:04 ---
I see this every once in a while on a different testcase.
CCing Jeff as he is the person who knows DOM a lot.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16 19:11
---
I don't reproduce this on amd64. It was raining in the machine room yesterday,
so I don't have access to my ia64 machine to see if it's something special
there.
--
Since code size is more important than speed for the avr target,
I'd like to suggest to add '-Os' to 'gcc/config/avr/t-avr'
(TARGET_LIBGCC2_CFLAGS)
Comments?
--
Summary: Compiling libgcc2.c with -Os for avr-gcc?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status:
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16 19:14
---
I'm still looking into it.
While with -fno-strict-aliasing the important part of the dump is:
# BLOCK 20
# PRED: 33 [100.0%] (fallthru) 30 [100.0%] (fallthru)
# TMT.382D.16594_470 = PHI
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
19:16 ---
Reduced testcase:
typedef enum _SECStatus {
SECWouldBlock = -2,
SECFailure = -1,
SECSuccess = 0
} SECStatus;
typedef enum {
SEC_ERROR_BAD_SIGNATURE = (-0x2000) + 10
} SECErrorCodes;
void g(void);
--- Additional Comments From roger at eyesopen dot com 2005-02-16 19:17
---
Hmm. I don't think the problem in this case is at the tree-level, where I think
keeping X-(Y*C) and -(Y*C) as a more canonical X + (Y*C') and Y*C' should help
with reassociation and other tree-ssa
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
19:19 ---
Subject: Bug 19865
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-16 19:19:35
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog tree-optimize.c
Log
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
19:21 ---
Fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00943.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--
Bug 18706 depends on bug 19865, which changed state.
Bug 19865 Summary: [4.0 Regression] ice / gnat bug detected.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19865
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
19:25 ---
Subject: Bug 19864
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-16 19:25:07
Modified files:
libjava: ChangeLog Makefile.am Makefile.in
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -std=gnu99 -version -fPIC -o
iso-2022-cn-ext.s
GNU C version 4.0.0 20050216 (experimental) (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.0.0 20050216 (experimental).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
iso-2022-cn
--- Additional Comments From aj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16 19:27
---
Created an attachment (id=8207)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8207action=view)
Preprocessed source file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20017
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
19:32 ---
This also can be seen on x86:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2005-02/msg00052.html
Confirmed. Most likely DOM is doing some thing wrong.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
19:35 ---
I am retesting ppc-darwin right now to see if this bug has been fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18706
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-16
19:44 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19865
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20017
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14303
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19944
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19921
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo