--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-06
07:29 ---
Subject: Re: [PR c++/20103] failure to gimplify constructors for addressable
types
On Mar 5, 2005, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> Testing now. I was a bit surprised
--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2005-03-06 05:59 ---
Subject: Re: [meta-bug] optimizations that CSE still
catches
On Sat, 2005-03-05 at 10:39 +, stevenb at suse dot de wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From stevenb at suse dot de 2005-03-05 10:39
> --
--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-06 05:25
---
See patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg00504.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18537
--- Additional Comments From kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu
2005-03-06 04:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] ACATS c391002 c432002 ICE
categorize_ctor_elements_1
Note that there is a fix for this "in the pipe" waiting for Arno's next
tree synchronization.
--
htt
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-06
02:24 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
--- Additional Comments From eyal at eyal dot emu dot id dot au 2005-03-06
02:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=8340)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8340&action=view)
Sample program to demonstrate the problem
Adjust the compiler setup at the top ($cc is needed).
set
gcc cvs head on Linux 2.6.11 on P4.
I am chasing a problem with mudflap. Running off uptodate cvs head.
To this end I created a simple test program (attached) which does
many memory malloc/free in a heavily multithreaded environment.
The sample program aborts regularly, while the problem I am aft
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-06
00:32 ---
The first case of comment #14 turns out to be PR20130.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19721
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-06 00:14
---
Subject: Re: [PR c++/19199] don't turn cond_expr lvalue into min_expr rvalue
(continued from PR c++/20280)
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Here's a patch that fixes PR c++/19199, by avoiding the transformat
--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05 23:46
---
Fixed. A saner error message is generated for mangled implied-do loops.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
23:39 ---
Subject: Bug 19936
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-05 23:39:52
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: Change
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
23:37 ---
I don't think this will be fixed for 4.1, unless we kick out implicit
sets from gcse, or all of gcse. The former may be possible if our
const/copy prop at the tree level is good enough, but I wouldn't coun
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
23:35 ---
Subject: Bug 19936
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-05 23:35:46
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: ChangeLog primary.c
Log message:
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19531
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
23:20 ---
Confirmed, note with -fdump-tree-all, we ICE also which seems wrong.
--
What|Removed |Added
Here's very simple example of class that compiles fine but crashes during
execution. It has something to do with "private" modifier in method of nested
class - after removing "private" the problem disappears.
$ cat Outer.java
public class Outer {
public static void main(String[] args) {
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19754
--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05 22:31
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
22:18 ---
Subject: Bug 19754
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-05 22:18:28
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
22:13 ---
Subject: Bug 19754
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-05 22:13:22
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: ChangeLog resolve.c
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-05 21:47
---
Subject: Re: [PR c++/20103] failure to gimplify constructors for addressable
types
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Testing now. I was a bit surprised that the casts to (const B&)
> weren't reported as faulty, but
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
21:04 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From bonniot at users dot sf dot net 2005-03-05
21:02 ---
Verified. The patch works for me.
(I can't really set to verified since I'm not the original submitter)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18362
Greetings,
Building dynamicly linked binaries works without any warnings/error messages.
But when you run them they always say "illegal instruction" and thus fail. This
is always the case. From what i've gathered the linking worked fine in 2.xx gcc
series but has never worked in 3.xx. Running stat
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20331
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20226
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20139
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20093
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20089
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20042
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20031
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19959
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19956
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19900
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19885
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19835
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19686
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19505
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19456
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19454
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19408
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19324
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19185
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19097
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1888
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18863
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18859
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18796
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18727
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18659
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18485
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18434
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18399
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18346
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18335
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18279
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18190
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18170
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17729
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Keywords||patch
Target Milestone|---
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
Version|unknown |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17687
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17356
--- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
19:48 ---
Treelang doesn't have a driver outside of gcc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20326
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16589
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15616
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15212
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15065
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14798
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13754
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10353
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20270
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
19:43 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05 19:42
---
Patch was posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2004-07/msg00130.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15754
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
19:40 ---
I take that back, this is invalid code still, the typename keyword is not valid
outside of a template.
Reduced testcase:
template struct f {};
f f2[2] = {typename f()};
This is a regression from 3.3.3. We
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
19:31 ---
Hmm, but I can reduce it to look like valid code.
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
19:26 ---
The code is invalid as you don't have a closing ")" for a function in the array
declaration of exuApis.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
19:17 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen
dot de 2005-03-05 19:03 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] threefold
performance loss, not inlining as much
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20335
--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05 18:57
---
Here's a rduced version. This caused by UBOUND call
on the allocated array.
module types
type lineListType
type(vertexType), dimension(:), pointer :: vertex
end type
end module types
module flow
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
18:49 ---
Even with Richard Guenther's patches, the only thing that really helps is
setting --param large-function-growth=200, or more. The default is 100.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17863
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
18:06 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
--
Bug 17574 depends on bug 20155, which changed state.
Bug 20155 Summary: [4.0 Regression] libgcj build fails with "execvp: /bin/sh:
Argument list too long"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20155
What|Old Value |New Value
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
18:04 ---
Fixed also on the 4.0 branch. Thanks Roger for picking this one.
--
What|Removed |Added
The online list archives for February, both web and ftp, have gaps around
the time of the system failure (i.e., from last backup to when the system
went down) which need filling in from the qmail archives or any other
archives if there are problems with those.
Note that the ftp mbox archives inclu
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
17:33 ---
Subject: Bug 20155
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-05 17:33:00
Modified files:
libjava: Change
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
17:03 ---
Hmm, I am using a slightly older compiler, so maybe this is fixed already.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18546
--
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #8335|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20333
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
16:44 ---
Fixed on the mainline at least.
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.0/4.1 Regressio
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
16:33 ---
Subject: Bug 20155
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-05 16:33:15
Modified files:
libjava: ChangeLog Makefile.am Makefile.in
L
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
16:33 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
--- Additional Comments From cjb at mrao dot cam dot ac dot uk 2005-03-05
15:53 ---
> No you are no missing reading. This is vectorized on x86 but not on PPC.
Thanks, Andrew. I'm also having trouble reproducing it on PPC (under OS X
10.3.4), though. Same GCC source tree and test sour
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
15:46 ---
Fixed in the mainline. Other branches are being tested and will be
fixed once I finish retesting the patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
15:44 ---
Subject: Bug 19311
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-05 15:44:26
Modified files:
gcc/cp : init.c pt.c typeck.c ChangeLog
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05 15:33
---
Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-03/msg00060.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From phillip dot m dot jordan at gmail dot com
2005-03-05 15:32 ---
Correction:
It probably shouldn't ICE even if it's *not* valid, though.
~phil
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From phillip dot m dot jordan at gmail dot com
2005-03-05 15:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=8337)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8337&action=view)
the source code causing the Internal Compiler Error
After extraction, compile with
gfortran -
I'm running gfortran from the 4.0-LATEST development snapshot:
GNU Fortran 95 (GCC 4.0.0 20050226 (prerelease))
on a SUSE 9.2 GNU/Linux system. (dual AthlonMP)
I know I'm supposed to attach preprocessed files only, but I can't figure out
how to do that with Fortran *modules*, and there doesn't se
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
14:03 ---
Subject: Re: [PR c++/20103] failure to gimplify constructors for addressable
types
On Mar 5, 2005, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2005, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
