--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
08:04 ---
Subject: Bug 20125
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-03 08:04:04
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
08:04 ---
Subject: Bug 20471
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-03 08:04:04
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
08:04 ---
Subject: Bug 20068
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-03 08:04:04
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
08:04 ---
Subject: Bug 20156
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-03 08:04:04
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
08:07 ---
Subject: Bug 20471
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-03 08:07:43
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
libgfortran: C
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
08:07 ---
Subject: Bug 20068
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-03 08:07:43
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
libgfortran: C
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
08:07 ---
Subject: Bug 20125
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-03 08:07:43
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
libgfortran: C
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
08:07 ---
Subject: Bug 20156
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-03 08:07:43
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
libgfortran: C
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
08:09 ---
Subject: Bug 20727
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-03 08:08:59
Modified files:
libjava: ChangeLog
libjava/java/nio:
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
08:09 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
08:10 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--
Bug 19292 depends on bug 20125, which changed state.
Bug 20125 Summary: gfortran - backspace on binary files errors
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20125
What|Old Value |New Value
--
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
08:10 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
08:10 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
08:11 ---
Subject: Bug 20727
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-03 08:11:27
Modified files:
libjava: Change
Hi,
when checking out the gcc tree this morning for a clean rebuild and regular
testsuite run, I observed that bootstrap failed. It seems that it is related
to some preprocessor issue:
1.) Problem occures when assembling the libgcc library. First failing
operation is
/home/bmh/gnucvs
--- Additional Comments From green at redhat dot com 2005-04-03 08:28
---
Fix checked into 4.0 branch and HEAD.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc
--- Additional Comments From green at redhat dot com 2005-04-03 08:28
---
Fix committed to 4.0 branch and HEAD.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From james dot kanze at free dot fr 2005-04-03
11:04 ---
Subject: Re: Problem with order of destruction in shared object.
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-27 19:45 ---
> How di
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
11:27 ---
Subject: Bug 20648
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-03 11:27:39
Modified files:
gcc: bb-reorder.c ChangeLog
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
12:32 ---
2005-04-03 Nathan Sidwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/20723
* pt.c (more_specialized_fn): Member functions are unordered wrt
non-members. Conversion operators are unordered wrt othe
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
12:33 ---
Subject: Bug 20723
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-03 12:33:02
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog pt.c
gcc/testsuite
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
12:49 ---
Should be fixed on mainline now, can someone confirm this for ia64?
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
12:51 ---
This bug disappeared today for me. Coalan, do you still see it?
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
Keywords||build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2073
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20727
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
13:11 ---
Closing as works for me.
I want to say because they did not read the installation instructions.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] - |[3.3/3.4 regression] -Wsynth
|Wsynth warning in |warning in
Target Milestone|4.0.0
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
13:16 ---
Can you add -v to the orginal command and give the output?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20738
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-04-03 13:24 ---
Regression test still running, but bootstrap has succeeded.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status
--
Bug 15242 depends on bug 20648, which changed state.
Bug 20648 Summary: [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in
cfg_layout_redirect_edge_and_branch_force
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20648
What|Old Value |New Value
---
--- Additional Comments From pfelecan at acm dot org 2005-04-03 13:38
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Ok for the preprocessed source line 91 for the preproceser source:
> .long .LFB1-.
assembled on Solaris 10 Intel:
/usr/ccs/bin/as -V -Qy -s -o sysv.o sysv.s
as: Sun Compiler Common 10
--- Additional Comments From bjoern dot m dot haase at web dot de
2005-04-03 14:04 ---
Hi,
I have so far found out, that the problem I have observed comes from the
configure process. For a reason, I have not figured out so far, my newly built
xgcc did try to pipe the asm sources thr
lify_addr_expr, at gimplify.c:3246
This is GCC 4.1.0 20050403 on (i686-pc-linux-gnu).
The problem showed up in ncurses.
--
Summary: [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in gimplify_addr_expr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
14:33 ---
C ICE-on-valid bugs are release critical.
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-04-03 14:40 ---
Fixed on mainline.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
14:41 ---
Subject: Bug 14812
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-03 14:41:25
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
gcc/config/arm : a
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
14:49 ---
We ICE on an assert:
#ifdef ENABLE_CHECKING
tree t_op0 = TREE_TYPE (op0);
gcc_assert ((TREE_CODE (t_op0) == ARRAY_TYPE
&& POINTER_TYPE_P (t_expr)
--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
14:56 ---
Fixed. I've also done a full audit of the other patterns and fixed similar
cases that I could find.
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03 15:21
---
The test still fails on some platforms, at least on mainline:
On ia64-hp-hpux11.23:
Executing on host:
/scratch/gcc/nightly-2005-04-03-mainline/ia64-hp-hpux11.23/build_gcc/build/gcc/xgcc
-B/scratch/gcc/night
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
15:32 ---
Introduced by rth's patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-09/msg00682.html.
If this patch was ever posted to gcc-patches, I can't find the mail for it.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
16:53 ---
Confirmed.
Note you don't even have to include the *(&a) part either:
typedef struct
{
char chars[5];
}
baz_t;
extern baz_t * baz;
extern void foo (baz_t);
int
bar (const baz_t * ls)
{
foo (ls == 0
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14316
--- Additional Comments From jim at dishaw dot org 2005-04-03 16:59 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This error does not make sense.
> could attach the full build log for this target?
That is the extent of the build. What I find unusual is that the configure
script has target-libiberty as
--- Additional Comments From jim at dishaw dot org 2005-04-03 17:01 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This error does not make sense.
> could attach the full build log for this target?
This file contains any messages produced by compilers while
running configure, to aid debugging if configu
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
17:04 ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> The test still fails on some platforms, at least on mainline:
>
> On ia64-hp-hpux11.23:
This is a target problem and most likely deserves a new PR instead as it might
not be a r
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
17:12 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> But the above worked with "4.0.0 20050225" so something more recent
> introduced the problem.
Even the the orginal testcase works with that above version too.
I am thinking this w
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
17:14 ---
How did you configure?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20737
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
17:18 ---
This is related to PR 20465 and PR 20381 which you fixed with:
2005-03-22 Nathan Sidwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/20465
PR c++/20381
* typeck.c (build_ptrmemfunc): Allow OFFSET_R
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
17:20 ---
Suspending as the other targets bugs are also suspended when you don't have
32bit libs.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
The following code segfaults.
void foo (tree);
void bar (const char *, ...) __attribute__ ((__format__ (__gcc_diag__, 1, 2)))
--
Summary: cc1 segfaults
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
--- Additional Comments From jim at dishaw dot org 2005-04-03 17:42 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> How did you configure?
../gcc/configure --with-gmp=/sys/sdf/sci --with-mpfr=/sys/sdf/sci
--prefix=/sys/sdf/sci --enable-languages=c,c++,f95
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
17:42 ---
Confirmed, a regression from 3.3.x.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
17:50 ---
It also fails with "4.1.0 20050308".
I think this was caused by:
2005-03-05 Kriang Lerdsuwanakij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/19311
* init.c (build_offset_ref): Don't build non-dependent SCO
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
18:11 ---
Closing as works for me.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat dot com 2005-04-03 18:11
---
hdf5 is also hitting this ICE.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17917
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
18:19 ---
On hppa64-hp-hpux*, I think we still have the same bug. Combine is
still generating an insn that reload can't handle:
(insn 16 15 17 0 (asm_operands/v ("") ("") 0 [
(mem/s/v/j:HI (mem/u/c:DI (l
The 2005 Canadian Business Database is a fully functional application with
enhanced search capabilities that allow business owners and
marketing/sales professionals to search, sort, print and export contact
lists. The 2005 Canadian Business Database is the ideal solution for
creating effective and
# gcc -Wall -c bug.c -DBUG
bug.c: In function 'foo':
bug.c:10: error: jump into statement expression
bug.c:13: error: jump into statement expression
bug.c:11: error: jump into statement expression
bug.c:14: error: jump into statement expression
bug.c:14: warning: label 'encodeend1' defined bu
--- Additional Comments From pluto at pld-linux dot org 2005-04-03 18:55
---
Created an attachment (id=8522)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8522&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20741
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
18:56 ---
No this is invalid code, see PR 772 and PR 17913.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 772 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-03
18:56 ---
*** Bug 20741 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerald at pfeifer dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20731
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-04-04 00:37
---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about
returning a reference to a temporary
roger at eyesopen dot com wrote:
> I'd hoped I'd made this clear when I proposed the alternate strategy of
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-04
01:26 ---
Somehow missing from bugzilla is this comment from Dave:
The patch improves the situation but there are still many fails:Executing on
host: /opt/build/dave/gcc-4.0.0/objdir/gcc/g++ -shared-libgcc
-B/opt/bu
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-04
01:30 ---
Dave, I think that the problem with _S_do_it is an entirely separate bug. In
particular, V3 builds with -fno-inline-templates, but does not use
-fno-implicit-inline-templates. The _S_do_it function is inl
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-04-04 01:58 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for
__cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
"mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Dave, I think that the problem with _
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-04-04 02:13 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for
__cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
> Somehow missing from bugzilla is this comment from Dave:
I believe that it's actually there. I
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-04-04 03:07 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for
__cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
> --- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-04
> 01:30 ---
> D
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-04-04 03:21 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for
__cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info
> Dave, I think that the problem with _S_do_it is an entirely separate bug. In
> particular, V3 bu
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-04
04:47 ---
It has been 3 months now, is this bug fixed or not?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17527
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-04
05:02 ---
Subject: Bug 19199
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-04 05:02:10
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog fold-const.c
gcc/t
73 matches
Mail list logo
