[Bug fortran/22023] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_dtype at trans_array.c:177

--- Additional Comments From c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de 2005-06-13 06:52 --- Subject: Re: ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_dtype at trans_array.c:177 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sorry for posting the duplicates (this and 22027), next time I shall look at the date o

[Bug tree-optimization/22000] [4.0 Regression] Read from volatile member of struct is optimized away

--- Additional Comments From rpedersen at atmel dot com 2005-06-13 06:42 --- Is it posible find out why it is woking in the mainline and generate a patch for 4.0.0? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22000

[Bug tree-optimization/21994] [4.1 regression] complex throwing functions cause ICE

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 06:16 --- Fixed in C++ for sure; I don't seem to be able to build Ada at the moment. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/21994] [4.1 regression] complex throwing functions cause ICE

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 06:10 --- Subject: Bug 21994 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-13 06:10:49 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-complex.c Log messag

[Bug target/22017] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Error to pass struct parameter when compile with mingw's gcc.exe using "-march=i386 -mrtd" flags

--- Additional Comments From lyuzhou at 21cn dot com 2005-06-13 05:41 --- I just apply your patch to mingw gcc 3.4.4. But it seems failed too. (In reply to comment #3) > Hi, > This is what is says in the comments above i386/i386.c: > ix86_return_pop_args: >FUNDECL is the declaration

[Bug preprocessor/22042] New: stringification BUG

// test code #define S(X) S2(X) #define S2(X) #X #define TAB " " /* 0x09 */ S(S(TAB)) // gcc -E -P OUTPUT "\"\\\"\\011\\\"\"" // expected result "\"\\\" \\\"\"" GCC # preprocessing operator converts the non-printable characters to octal. But this behavior is non standard. --

[Bug tree-optimization/21000] store should not be done if we don't change its value

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 04:11 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug tree-optimization/20999] store should not be done if we don't change its value

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 04:09 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug target/19672] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Performance regression in simple loop code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 04:06 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||3.4.0 4.0.

[Bug middle-end/16172] simple function generates an memmove() call instead of inlining

-- What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |enhancement Last reconfirmed|2004-06-24 15:14:29 |2005-06-13 03:58:53 date|

[Bug debug/914] libgcc2 compile causes internal error for mips-wrs-vxworks

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 03:42 --- Is this target ever going to be readded or should this bug be closed? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=914

[Bug c++/13640] Failing to reject class template partial specialization which can never be selected

-- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13640

[Bug c++/10634] in-class initialization of static data members no longer allowed

-- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10634

[Bug debug/12869] Bad stabs for bitsize fields

-- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12869

[Bug ada/19959] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Can't compile gnattools for the cross targets

-- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19959

[Bug bootstrap/21481] crtstuff.c should not include auto-host.h

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 03:35 --- Then lets remove the regression markers as it is no longer a regression and change the summary to refect reality. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/21538] g++.dg/opt/temp1.C should be optimized elsewhere

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 03:33 --- Lets close this as invalid for now. -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED

[Bug target/19704] ICE for tail call of regparm 3 and dllimport

-- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19704

[Bug libstdc++/15046] Math functions misdetected by cross configuration

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 03:29 --- (In reply to comment #9) > This patch actually breaks uclinux, since it doesn't provide a number of the > functions defined here. Also, the problem of stub functions recursively > calling > themselves is n

[Bug libstdc++/11953] _REENTRANT defined when compiling non-threaded code.

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 03:29 --- Did we decide this is a bug or not? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11953

[Bug fortran/19574] specification expression failure

-- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19574

[Bug fortran/18923] segfault after subroutine name confusion

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 03:27 --- Hmm, on powerpc-darwin built at -O0, we don't get a seg fault but on i686-pc-linux-gnu with a bootstrapped compiler we do. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug libfortran/20930] [4.0 Regression] gfortran.dg/backspace.f execution test

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 03:23 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/19926] Incorrect rank with PARAMETER and array element.

--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 01:49 --- New patch. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg01088.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19926

[Bug java/20469] gcjh does not rename Java variables named NULL

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 00:44 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug c++/21930] [4.1 regression] pretty printer confusion

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 00:41 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/14796] [tree-ssa] combine two shifts into one

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14796

[Bug middle-end/19986] [meta-bug] fold missing optimizations (compared to RTL)

-- Bug 19986 depends on bug 14796, which changed state. Bug 14796 Summary: [tree-ssa] combine two shifts into one http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14796 What|Old Value |New Value ---

[Bug tree-optimization/14796] [tree-ssa] combine two shifts into one

--- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 00:27 --- Fixed in previous commits. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/14796] [tree-ssa] combine two shifts into one

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 00:18 --- Subject: Bug 14796 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-13 00:18:41 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog fold-const.c gcc/t

[Bug c++/21930] [4.1 regression] pretty printer confusion

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 23:46 --- Subject: Bug 21930 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-12 23:46:46 Modified files: gcc/cp : ChangeLog error.c gcc/testsu

[Bug tree-optimization/22041] Reverse loop order for increased efficiency

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 23:44 --- Confirmed, on ppc-darwin we do reverse the loop and we use the do-loop patterns: L4: lfsx f0,r2,r4 add r2,r2,r7 stfsx f0,r3,r0 add r0,r0,r6 bdnz L4 L11: lfsx f

[Bug c++/7588] Built-in functions not marked as such

--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-06-12 23:35 --- Subject: Re: Built-in functions not marked as such "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Any news on this because nobody understand this bug except for the reporter. The rep

[Bug c++/7588] Built-in functions not marked as such

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 23:23 --- Any news on this because nobody understand this bug except for the reporter. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7588

[Bug target/19724] ICE when building a m68hc11 cross-compiler on ia64

--- Additional Comments From aurelien at aurel32 dot net 2005-06-12 22:08 --- I have just tried to build the new version (3.0.1) on ia64, and it his now building correctly. Thanks! This bug can now be closed. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/21930] [4.1 regression] pretty printer confusion

-- What|Removed |Added CC|roger at eyesopen dot com | AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |roger at eyesopen dot com |dot org

[Bug tree-optimization/22041] New: Reverse loop order for increased efficiency

The loop in the following code $ cat stride.c void foo(float *a, float *b, int n, int stride_a, int stride_b) { int i; for (i=0; i:; *(float *) ivtmp.14 = *(float *) ivtmp.12; i = i + 1; ivtmp.12 = ivtmp.12 + ivtmp.18; ivtmp.14 = ivtmp.14 + ivtmp.17; if (n != i) goto ; else goto ; a

[Bug tree-optimization/13875] [tree-ssa] missed jump thread optimization on the tree-level

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 20:41 --- Hmm, I have not seen any more, could you double check this? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13875

[Bug libfortran/21333] [4.0 only] in_pack / in_unpack alignment issues

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 20:28 --- Subject: Bug 21333 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-12 20:27:59 Modified files: libgfortran: ChangeLog Log message: 2005

[Bug libfortran/19155] [4.0 only] blanks not treated as zeros in 'E' format read (NIST FM110.FOR)

--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 20:05 --- Fixed on mainline, waiting for 4.0 to reopen. With that patch, FM110 no longer fails. One less in NIST testsuite. As for comment 13 (testcase failure on AIX), I'm waiting for additional feedback. --

[Bug libfortran/19155] blanks not treated as zeros in 'E' format read (NIST FM110.FOR)

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 19:59 --- Subject: Bug 19155 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-12 19:59:17 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/testsuite/gfor

[Bug tree-optimization/22031] Poor code from unrolled simple loop

--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-06-12 19:37 --- Subject: Re: Poor code from unrolled simple loop "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 > 13:48 --- > I th

[Bug c++/22040] gcc 4.0 examines dependent base classes

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 19:06 --- I have seen this bug before. Yes, PR 5660. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 5660 *** -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/5660] [DR213] dependent names involving templates & inheritance

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 19:06 --- *** Bug 22040 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/22040] New: gcc 4.0 examines dependent base classes

Gcc 4.0 (and prior) rejects the well-fromed program below. The error message suggests that the compiler attempts to call the function A::foo() defined in the dependent base class of B contrary to the requirement in 14.6.2, p3, but fails to consider the function foo(A). $ cat t.cpp && g++ t.cpp /*

[Bug libfortran/19155] blanks not treated as zeros in 'E' format read (NIST FM110.FOR)

--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 17:48 --- Sigh. I really, really, detest these special cases of "E+00" and "+ ", which violate the Fortran 95 standard. But, g77 appears to accept both. :-( OK for mainline. :-( -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug ada/22039] New: special functions for string concat of 3/4/5 args doc'ed to concat two

All of the comments on System.String_Ops_Concat_[345].Str_Concat_[345] read -- Concatenate two strings and return resulting string ^^^ They do concatenate 3 to 5 strings, respectively. s-sopco[345].ads -- Summary: special functions for string concat of 3/4/5 ar

[Bug tree-optimization/22037] [4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 16:00 --- Confirmed, reduced testcase: extern double sqrt (double __x) throw (); int numDerivs1; int ComputeAStep( double& error) { int i, numDerivs; numDerivs = numDerivs1; for(i=0; ihttp://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug fortran/22038] Forall with mask broken

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-06-

[Bug fortran/22038] Forall with mask broken

--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 15:50 --- A patch which fixes the testcase is here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-06/msg00138.html Further fixes to FORALL here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-06/msg00166.html -- What|Removed

[Bug fortran/22038] Forall with mask broken

--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 15:43 --- Discussed in this thread: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-06/msg00101.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22038

[Bug fortran/22038] New: Forall with mask broken

This is why gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90 is XFAILed. -- Summary: Forall with mask broken Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: fortran As

[Bug tree-optimization/22037] [4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 15:27 --- Copyprop4 is causing the ICE, I wonder if this is related to the bug which I reported to gcc@ when removing forwprop pass. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug boehm-gc/21940] boehm-gc gctest fails on Solaris 10/x86

-- What|Removed |Added Component|libgcj |boehm-gc http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21940

[Bug boehm-gc/21942] boehm-gc doesn't compile on Solaris 10/amd64

-- What|Removed |Added Component|libgcj |boehm-gc http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21942

[Bug c++/22037] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

--- Additional Comments From mmalater at nycap dot rr dot com 2005-06-12 15:16 --- Created an attachment (id=9077) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9077&action=view) g++ -save-temps Adding .ii using the compilation line with -save-temps -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi

[Bug c++/22037] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

--- Additional Comments From mmalater at nycap dot rr dot com 2005-06-12 15:14 --- Adding version: $ /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ --version g++ (GCC) 4.1.0 20050607 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Thi

[Bug c++/22037] New: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

I cannot compile VTK using gcc 4.1.0 (at least the one shipped in gcc-snapshot). Step to reproduce (on debian testing system): 1. sudo apt-get install gcc-snapshot (as of today) 2. Get VTK source (CVS) 3. Compile line is: /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -o vtkRungeKutta45.o -DvtkCommon_EXPORTS -Wa

[Bug libgcj/22036] libjava/jni.cc compilation fix in cvs 2005-06-12

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 15:12 --- This compiles just fine for me. -- What|Removed |Added Component|java

[Bug java/22036] libjava/jni.cc compilation fix in cvs 2005-06-12

--- Additional Comments From jserv at kaffe dot org 2005-06-12 15:09 --- Created an attachment (id=9076) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9076&action=view) compilation fix to libjava/jni.cc -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22036

[Bug target/15397] [g77] c float function called from fortran gives wrong result

-- What|Removed |Added GCC build triplet|x86_64 GNU/Linux| GCC host triplet|x86_64 GNU/Linux| GCC target triplet|x86_64 GNU/Linux|x86_64-linux

[Bug target/22017] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Error to pass struct parameter when compile with mingw's gcc.exe using "-march=i386 -mrtd" flags

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-06-

[Bug java/22036] New: libjava/jni.cc compilation fix in cvs 2005-06-12

I've cvs checked out gcc mainline (2005-06-12) to build gcj, and I found there were some compilation errors about libjava/jni.cc . The attachment is my fix against libjava/jni.cc . -- Summary: libjava/jni.cc compilation fix in cvs 2005-06-12 Product: gcc Version:

[Bug target/22017] Error to pass struct parameter when compile with mingw's gcc.exe using "-march=i386 -mrtd" flags

-- What|Removed |Added GCC build triplet|Microsoft Windows 2000 | GCC host triplet|--host=mingw32 | GCC target triplet|--target=mingw32|i386-*-mingw

[Bug libstdc++/21951] [4.0 only] std::vector.reserve() unusable with -Werror -Wall -O -fno-exceptions

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-06-

[Bug fortran/22010] Namelists defined in modules not handled properly

--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 14:33 --- Patch posted. -- What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/22033] [4.1 Regression] ACATS ICE cd1c04e create_variable_info_for, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2789

-- What|Removed |Added Component|ada |tree-optimization Summary|ACATS ICE cd1c04e |[4.1 Regression] ACATS ICE

[Bug tree-optimization/22035] [4.1 Regression] vector float comparison broken

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 14:11 --- Confirmed, latent bug exposed by: 2005-06-09 Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR tree-opt/20610 * tree.h (DECL_COMPLEX_GIMPLE_REG_P): New. (struct tree_decl): Add gimple_reg_f

[Bug middle-end/22035] Complex comparison broken

-- What|Removed |Added Summary|Flaot comparison broken |Complex comparison broken http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22035

[Bug tree-optimization/22014] [4.1 Regression] ICE in do_structure_copy, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2363

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 14:07 --- *** Bug 22030 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/22030] [4.1 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 14:07 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22014 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/22035] New: Flaot comparison broken

[EMAIL PROTECTED] tests]$ cat f2c_6.f90 complex :: z, p z = (2.,0.) if (p /= z) call abort () end [EMAIL PROTECTED] tests]$ ~/src/gcc-new/build/gcc/f951 f2c_6.f90 -O MAIN__ unhandled expression in get_expr_operands(): unit size align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 precision 1 min ma

[Bug tree-optimization/22024] [4.1 Regression] ACATS ICE cxa5a07 cxa5a08 cxg2016 SEGV in get_rank tree-ssa-reassoc.c:292

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 14:04 --- Mine. Patch posted: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/14796] [tree-ssa] combine two shifts into one

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 13:55 --- Just a status, we are now waiting on the tree combiner to fix the orginal problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14796

[Bug c++/22005] [4.1 Regression] ICE: SSA_NAME verification failure

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 13:52 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/22031] Poor code from unrolled simple loop

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 13:48 --- I think this is just the standard restrict bug is PR 16913. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22031

[Bug c++/22034] [4.1 Regression], ICE on valid, dwarf2

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 13:44 --- Confirmed, this is a recent regression, it worked with "4.1.0 20050530" -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/21173] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompiled pointer subtraction broke Linux kernel

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 13:24 --- *** Bug 22032 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/22032] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 13:24 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21173 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/22034] New: [4.1 regression, ICE on valid] dwarf2

Consider the following reduction from a wxWidgets source module: const char* GetAssertStackTrace() { struct StackDump { virtual void OnStackFrame() {} const char* GetStackTrace() const; }; StackDump dump; return dump.GetStackTrace(); } const char* st

[Bug tree-optimization/22024] [4.1 Regression] ACATS ICE cxa5a07 cxa5a08 cxg2016 SEGV in get_rank tree-ssa-reassoc.c:292

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-06-12 11:44 --- I confirm your patch fixes all ACATS, could you submit it? Thanks! http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-06/msg00764.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22024

[Bug tree-optimization/22025] [4.1 Regression] ACATS ICE (8) fieldoff_compare, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2550

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-06-12 11:40 --- All fixed on x86_64-linux as of. LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jun 12 09:18:42 UTC 2005 Thanks for the patch! -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/22033] New: ACATS ICE cd1c04e create_variable_info_for, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2789

+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.1.0 20050612 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) GCC error: | | in create_variable_info_for, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2789 | | Error detected at cd1c04e.adb:124:5

[Bug fortran/18428] No preprocessing option -cpp for gfortran

--- Additional Comments From c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de 2005-06-12 11:36 --- > "gfortran -x f95-cpp-input" works > maybe this should be documented. This is not the same. 1) The -x option states that ALL following input files should be treated as being of type 2) The former

[Bug libfortran/21950] All gfortran execution tests fail on Tru64 UNIX V4.0F: scalbn unresolved

--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 10:51 --- Since scalbnis only used in set_exponent, we could provide a fallback implementation (I'm not a FP expert, but I'm not sure the libjava implementation is very portable). What about the naïve implementation

[Bug tree-optimization/22032] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

--- Additional Comments From pb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 10:23 --- Created an attachment (id=9075) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9075&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22032

[Bug tree-optimization/22032] New: ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

The attached file causes the compiler to crash at -O2: $ cc1 -O2 default.i [...] Analyzing compilation unit Performing intraprocedural optimizations Assembling functions: get_defaults_files free_defaults search_default_file_with_ext search_default_file load_defaults print_defaults default.c

[Bug target/22017] Error to pass struct parameter when compile with mingw's gcc.exe using "-march=i386 -mrtd" flags

--- Additional Comments From dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2005-06-12 09:39 --- Hi, This is what is says in the comments above i386/i386.c: ix86_return_pop_args: FUNDECL is the declaration node of the function (as a tree), FUNTYPE is the data type of the function (a

[Bug tree-optimization/22031] New: Poor code from unrolled simple loop

For this code: void f(int *__restrict t, const int *__restrict s) { unsigned long i; for (i = 0; i < 1024; i++) t[i] = s[i]; } gcc-3.3 produces with -O3 -funroll-loops: : 0: 17 04 ff 47 clr t9 4: ff 03 1f 23 lda t10,1023 8: 1f 04 ff

[Bug libfortran/19155] blanks not treated as zeros in 'E' format read (NIST FM110.FOR)

--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 09:21 --- (In reply to comment #15) > NIST test FM110 is still failing, and here is the reduced testcase: Proposed patch for this problem: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-06/msg00240.html -- What

[Bug libfortran/19155] blanks not treated as zeros in 'E' format read (NIST FM110.FOR)

--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 08:05 --- NIST test FM110 is still failing, and here is the reduced testcase: $ cat FM110.f real a character*80 c c = "+ " read (c,"(F11.4)") a print *, a end $ g77 FM1

[Bug tree-optimization/14796] [tree-ssa] combine two shifts into one

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-12 08:03 --- Subject: Bug 14796 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-12 08:03:23 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog fold-const.c gcc/t