[Bug libfortran/23138] real-values print and add incorrectly (version 4.1.0 20050702, i686-pc-mingw32)

--- Additional Comments From jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-30 06:31 --- I have confirmed this bug on cygwin. We can't get current builds on cygwin, perhaps patch to pr21275 is needed? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23138

[Bug target/21275] [4.0/4.1 Regression] gcc 4.0.0 crash with mingw when using stdout in global var

--- Additional Comments From jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-30 06:29 --- Can or will this patch be put into mainline? Seems to be falling in a crack. It is needed to help with moving forward on pr23138. I will apply the patch given here. My first attempts failed, maybe I ha

[Bug libfortran/22570] Null Characters instead of blanks in text output.

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-30 06:18 --- Subject: Bug 22570 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-30 06:18:35 Modified files: libgfortran: Change

[Bug libfortran/22570] Null Characters instead of blanks in text output.

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-30 05:33 --- Subject: Bug 22570 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-30 05:33:40 Modified files: libgfortran: ChangeLog libgfortran/io : t

[Bug c/23143] [4.1 Regression] parameter forward declarations broken

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-30 03:10 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c/529] -Wshadow warns on function prototypes vs. global vars

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-30 03:09 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c/23145] struct {int i;} is not compatiable with struct {int i,j}

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-30 03:05 --- Hmm, Apple's 3.3-fast does not have this bug. sv.i:4: warning: conflicting types for `a' op.i:4: warning: previous declaration of `a' -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23145

[Bug c/23145] New: struct {int i;} is not compatiable with struct {int i,j}

The C front-end says that struct {int i;} is compatiable with struct {int i,j} which is wrong. The following testcase should be rejected but it is not: file1.c struct op { int i; }; void a (struct op* o); end - file2.c - struct listop { int i, j; }; void a(struct li

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||23145 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug target/22582] -rdynamic is undocumented

--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-30 02:16 --- Fixed on mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RES

[Bug target/5362] Undocumented target options

-- Bug 5362 depends on bug 22582, which changed state. Bug 22582 Summary: -rdynamic is undocumented http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22582 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug target/22582] -rdynamic is undocumented

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-30 02:12 --- Subject: Bug 22582 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-30 02:12:26 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/doc: i

[Bug c/23143] [4.1 Regression] parameter forward declarations broken

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-30 01:35 --- Subject: Bug 23143 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-30 01:34:58 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog c-decl.c c-parser.c

[Bug libgcj/22580] [4.1 Regression] 'make -j' doesn't affect source->bytecode compilation

--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-30 01:02 --- The problem is the compile-classes rule in the libjava/classpath/lib/Makefile.am file. This rule contains a line $(JAVAC) that has a recursive make hidden inside it. make -j requires that all lines that per

[Bug c/529] -Wshadow warns on function prototypes vs. global vars

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 23:58 --- Subject: Bug 529 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-29 23:58:37 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog c-decl.c gcc/testsui

[Bug c/23143] [4.1 Regression] parameter forward declarations broken

--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-07-29 23:34 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] parameter forward declarations broken On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Confirmed. I did not even know of this extension. I don't even see it >

[Bug c/23144] [4.0/4.1 Regression] invalid parameter forward declarations not diagnosed

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 23:34 --- Confirmed, this has been failing since at least 20040909. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/23144] New: [4.0/4.1 Regression] invalid parameter forward declarations not diagnosed

GCC 4.0 fails to diagnose cases of parameter forward declarations followed by no normal parameter declarations, such as int g1(int a;); int g2(int a; __attribute__((unused))); int g3(int;); int g4(int, long;); The same applies to 4.1 once I've fixed bug 23143. 3.4 diagnoses these cases. --

[Bug c/23143] [4.1 Regression] parameter forward declarations broken

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 23:30 --- Confirmed. I did not even know of this extension. I don't even see it as being a documented one either, unless I missed something obvious. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/23143] New: [4.1 Regression] parameter forward declarations broken

The new C parser lost a call to mark_forward_parm_decls, thereby completely breaking the GNU extension of forward parameter declarations. I'm testing a patch. Testcases: int f1(int a; int a); should be accepted (rather than complaining about a duplicate parameter name), int h1(int a; int b);

[Bug middle-end/21720] GCC incorrectly rounds hex floats

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 23:24 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/16989] [meta-bug] C99 conformance bugs

-- Bug 16989 depends on bug 21720, which changed state. Bug 21720 Summary: GCC incorrectly rounds hex floats http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21720 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug c++/16240] [3.4/3.5 ABI Regression] g++ generates incorrect mangled name

--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-07-29 22:38 --- I haven't checked g++ 3.3.x, but I have no reason to doubt you. I think you grasp the situation fine: at least for a while, g++ did not follow the ABI. Now it does. It's a problem. Any time you don't follow the ABI,

[Bug ada/23142] [4.1 regression] ACATS FAIL cxaa017 character processing wrong code

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug ada/23142] [4.1 regression] ACATS FAIL cxaa017 character processing wrong code

-- What|Removed |Added Summary|ACATS FAIL cxaa017 character|[4.1 regression] ACATS FAIL |processing wrong code |cxaa017 character processing

[Bug ada/23141] [4.1 Regression] ACATS FAIL c45651a fixed point wrong code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 22:20 --- I think this is a VRP bug, but I could be wrong. It might also be a fold-const bug. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/23046] [4.1 Regression] ICE in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:191

--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-07-29 22:20 --- waiting for testcase... -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITI

[Bug ada/23142] New: ACATS FAIL cxaa017 character processing wrong code

Started failing between LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jul 26 21:49:55 UTC 2005 LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jul 29 20:05:56 UTC 2005 on x86 and amd64-linux. ,.,. CXAA017 ACATS 2.5 05-07-30 00:03:57 CXAA017 Check that Ada.Text_IO subprograms Look_Ahead and Get_Immediate are available and produce co

[Bug ada/23141] New: ACATS FAIL c45651a fixed point wrong code

Started failing between LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jul 26 21:49:55 UTC 2005 LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jul 29 20:05:56 UTC 2005 on x86 and amd64-linux. ,.,. C45651A ACATS 2.5 05-07-29 23:43:34 C45651A CHECK THAT, FOR FIXED POINT TYPES, THE ABS OPERATOR PRODUCES CORRECT RESULTS - BASIC TYPES.

[Bug target/23080] [4.0 regression] m68k ICE

--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-07-29 22:00 --- I consider this fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVE

[Bug target/23078] [4.0 regression] m68k ICE

--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-07-29 21:59 --- I consider this fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVE

[Bug c++/23139] -pedantic -ffast-math breaks working code

--- Additional Comments From thor at math dot tu-berlin dot de 2005-07-29 21:18 --- Subject: Re: -pedantic -ffast-math breaks working code pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 > 21:06 --- > Can you atta

[Bug c++/23139] -pedantic -ffast-math breaks working code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 21:18 --- Hmm, if passed in 4.0.0 20050225 but fails on the mainline. It also works with the C front-end. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23139

[Bug c++/23139] -pedantic -ffast-math breaks working code

--- Additional Comments From thor at math dot tu-berlin dot de 2005-07-29 21:14 --- As per request, here is the preprocessed source code: int main(int argc,char **argv) { double v = (__extension__ 0x1.0p2047); printf("%f\n",v); return 0; } -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho

[Bug c++/11624] -Wnon-virtual-dtor doesn't always work

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 21:14 --- *** Bug 23140 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/23140] void warning on virtual classes with no destructor

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 21:14 --- Actually this was a requested thing for 4.0, see PR 11624. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11624 *** -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/21720] GCC incorrectly rounds hex floats

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 21:14 --- Subject: Bug 21720 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-29 21:14:22 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog real.c gcc/testsui

[Bug c++/23139] -pedantic -ffast-math breaks working code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 21:06 --- Can you attach the preprocessing source as the glibc I have installed defineds HUGE_VAL as __builtin_huge_val(). -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/23140] New: void warning on virtual classes with no destructor

If compiled with -Wall, g++-4.0.1 will warn on classes with virtual functions but *no* destructor at all. Note that even though this warning is well justified on classes implementing a destructor - because virtual classes might get deleted thru a base class pointer - this warning is not useful for

[Bug c++/23139] New: -pedantic -ffast-math breaks working code

Using the command line switches -pedantic -ffast-math triggers an error and aborts compilation of code using HUGE_VAL. To reproduce, save the following code as huge.cpp: #include #include int main(int argc,char **argv) { double v = HUGE_VAL; printf("%f\n",v); return 0; } Compile with:

[Bug middle-end/21990] Wrong code for 4.0 and head: Reload clobbers the frame pointer by using it as spill register without recognizing the clobbering

--- Additional Comments From bjoern dot m dot haase at web dot de 2005-07-29 20:06 --- Hi, a couple of weeks after identifying this issue, I have continued working with 4.0.0. I never observed a similar failure in our production code. The issue seems to be strongly linked to the con

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 19:29 --- Subject: Bug 23131 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: csl-arm-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-29 19:29:16 Modified files: . : Change

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 19:28 --- Subject: Bug 23131 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: csl-3_4_3-linux-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-29 19:28:31 Modified files: .

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 19:27 --- Subject: Bug 23131 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: csl-3_4_3-linux-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-29 19:27:12 Modified files: gcc

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 19:24 --- Fixed in GCC 4.1. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RE

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 19:20 --- Subject: Bug 23131 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-29 19:20:49 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog configure.ac configure Lo

[Bug libfortran/23138] real-values print and add incorrectly (version 4.1.0 20050702, i686-pc-mingw32)

--- Additional Comments From post at tillmann-wegst dot de 2005-07-29 19:01 --- (In reply to comment #1) > I cannot reproduce this with 20050729 on i686-pc-linux-gnu. Yes, Steve Kargl has told me the same. The bug appears to be particular with the MinGW-version. -- h

[Bug libfortran/23138] real-values print and add incorrectly (version 4.1.0 20050702, i686-pc-mingw32)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 18:54 --- I cannot reproduce this with 20050729 on i686-pc-linux-gnu. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/23138] New: real-values print and add incorrectly (version 4.1.0 20050702, i686-pc-mingw32)

Hi all, I'd like to report what looks like a bug in gfortran for Windows, version: "GNU F95 version 4.1.0 20050702 (experimental) (i686-pc-mingw32)" It concerns values of type real, which both print and add incorrectly. To give an example, take this little program: ---

[Bug c/16989] [meta-bug] C99 conformance bugs

-- Bug 16989 depends on bug 21720, which changed state. Bug 21720 Summary: GCC incorrectly rounds hex floats http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21720 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug middle-end/21720] GCC incorrectly rounds hex floats

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 18:31 --- It turns out my patch actually fixed a similar problem with the code handling digits before the ".", and my testcase didn't have enough zeroes to show the problem on 64-bit hosts. Testing a patch to fix the p

[Bug c++/16240] [3.4/3.5 ABI Regression] g++ generates incorrect mangled name

--- Additional Comments From uttamp at us dot ibm dot com 2005-07-29 18:16 --- I belive, till g++ 3.3.4, the mangled string used have that '_' as hown by following example, template struct S { S(int i=0); }; template &s> void f13(); extern S s13; int main(void) { f13();

[Bug c++/23137] Difficulty accessing base template members from derived template

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 18:14 --- Read the release notes for 3.4. This is invalid code. -- What|Removed |Added St

[Bug c++/23137] New: Difficulty accessing base template members from derived template

The piece of code attached compiled without errors under gcc 3.3.3 (Red Hat Linux), but failed with 3.4.2 (Windows XP) and 3.4.3 (Solaris 2.8). The information that I am sending in this report all pertains to 3.4.3 on Solaris. But I also installed a version of Dev-C++ which installs on Windows

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-07-

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 17:33 --- Yes, that's fixed the problem, thanks. Builds now complete ok (testing still in progress). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23131

[Bug tree-optimization/22550] [4.1 Regression] ICE in vrp_evaluate_conditional

--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 16:38 --- Fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg01971.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/22550] [4.1 Regression] ICE in vrp_evaluate_conditional

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 16:32 --- Subject: Bug 22550 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-29 16:32:01 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-cfgcleanup.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/23117] [4.1 Regression] ICE on valid code while building libgcc

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 16:31 --- *** Bug 23136 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/23136] arm-none-eabi doesn't build anymore

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 16:31 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 23117 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/23136] arm-none-eabi doesn't build anymore

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 16:24 --- I think this is a dup of bug 23117. Which was fixed by: 2005-07-29 Richard Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR rtl-optimization/23117 * sched-r

[Bug target/19421] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE with soft-float on m68k

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail|4.0.0 |4.0.0 4.0.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19421

[Bug target/23136] New: arm-none-eabi doesn't build anymore

The arm-none-eabi build prematurely terminates with a segfault while compiling crtstuff.c. Here is a reduced testcase. extern void abort (void) __attribute__((noreturn)); void foo (int a) { if (a) abort (); } According to our (CodeSourcery's) automated tester, this must have been caused b

[Bug middle-end/23135] find_reloads_toplev -> find_reloads_subreg_address uses wrong reload type

-- What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- ||patches/2005- |

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 16:01 --- Created an attachment (id=9386) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9386&action=view) Proposed patch Richard -- I've tested this patch and believe it correct. I'm running tests in more co

[Bug middle-end/23135] find_reloads_toplev -> find_reloads_subreg_address uses wrong reload type

--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 15:29 --- Created an attachment (id=9385) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9385&action=view) context & patch These are the patches that exposed the latent bug for sh-elf, together with the reload

[Bug middle-end/23135] New: find_reloads_toplev -> find_reloads_subreg_address uses wrong reload type

I've added a movti expander to sh.md, and found a regression for -m4 -ml on simd-1.c with optimization options -O1, -O2, -O3 and -Os . I've foun that a output reload address was being overwritten by a secondary output reload. The secondary output reload had RELOAD_FOR_OUTPUT_ADDRESS, and the addres

[Bug target/21723] [4.0 Regression] ICE while building libgfortran

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 15:08 --- Subject: Bug 21723 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-29 15:08:45 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug tree-optimization/23127] [4.1 Regression] VRP propagates negation of antirange incorrectly

--- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 14:59 --- I already commited testcases for this one and 23126. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23127

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 14:54 --- I understand what's causing this; patch coming soon. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23131

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 14:53 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 15:45, mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > What is SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR in your generated

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 14:45 --- Since you're not using --with-sysroot or --with-build-sysroot, I'm slightly surprised. What is SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR in your generated gcc/Makefile? Is it $(CROSS_SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR), $(NATIVE_SYSTEM_HEADER_DI

[Bug tree-optimization/23133] recip does not factor division by function parameter

--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 14:28 --- I have a patch for this. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/23134] Address escapes even though the called function does not cause it to escape

--- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru 2005-07-29 13:57 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/22284] [4.1 Regression] ia64 exception handling broken

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 13:50 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/23133] recip does not factor division by function parameter

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 13:45 --- Confirmed, another testcase (which might be needed as the redundant load of a and b are not done): double a, b; int x; double foo(double d) { double a1 = a, b1 = b; if (x) a1/=d; return (a1/d) *

[Bug rtl-optimization/19767] [3.4 only] CSE hang on very simple code with -O2 -ftracer

--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 13:43 --- Testing a patch -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rsan

[Bug tree-optimization/23134] Address escapes even though the called function does not cause it to escape

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23134

[Bug tree-optimization/23134] New: Address escapes even though the called function does not cause it to escape

Take this "stupid" example (even though this most likely shows up in GCC but I don't know for sure): int g1(int); static void h(int *a) { *a = 1; } int g(void) { int t = 0; h(&t); int t1 = t; g1(t1); return t1 == t; } That return should have been turned into "return 1" as t does not es

[Bug libstdc++/22284] [4.1 Regression] ia64 exception handling broken

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 13:36 --- Subject: Bug 22284 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-29 13:35:59 Modified files: libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog libstdc++-v3/libsu

[Bug tree-optimization/23133] New: recip does not factor division by function parameter

The following testcase, compiled with -O2 -ffast-math should have 1/d factored out, but doesn't, because d is a function parameter and recip walks SSA_NAME defs, and d does not have one. double a, b; int x; double foo(double d) { if (x) a/=d; return a/d + b/d; } -- Summary: r

[Bug libstdc++/11953] _REENTRANT defined when compiling non-threaded code.

--- Additional Comments From redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 12:40 --- Should a separate PR be opened requesting __GCC_PTHREADS__, so this PR can focus on whether _REENTRANT should be defined unconditionally and discussion of an alternative macro can take place separately? I have

[Bug rtl-optimization/17808] Scheduler overly conservative in sched-deps

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17808

[Bug rtl-optimization/17808] Scheduler overly conservative in sched-deps

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 12:39 --- It seems we've dealt with all the fall-out now. -- What|Removed |Added Status|

[Bug middle-end/22509] [4.1 regression] elemental.f90 testsuite failure (-fweb)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 12:38 --- This is a -fweb latent bug. If you do -O3 -fweb -funroll-loops on the 4.0 branch it also fails. I have a patch which seems to work around the bug but also causes cost model of address models to be diffe

[Bug c++/23132] Array delete'd through base class causes access violation in prog

--- Additional Comments From jorik dot dewit at gmail dot com 2005-07-29 12:29 --- (In reply to comment #1) > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22609 *** Sorry about reporting a duplicate. I had looked/searched. Maybe the default settings for the query form should include

[Bug tree-optimization/21559] [4.1 Regression] missed jump threading

-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21559

[Bug c++/22003] [4.1 Regression] -freorder-blocks-and-partition and thunks

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 12:20 --- My reduced testcase no longer ICEs. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22003

[Bug libstdc++/11953] _REENTRANT defined when compiling non-threaded code.

--- Additional Comments From david dot nospam dot hopwood at blueyonder dot co dot uk 2005-07-29 11:58 --- suggests defining __GNUC_THREADMODEL__ to a string specifying the thread model. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c

[Bug c++/22609] delete [] called on base virtual destructor class [Segmentation failed]

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:49 --- *** Bug 15050 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/15050] Compiled templated code crashes on delete []

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:49 --- Mark as a dup of bug 22609. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22609 *** -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/15050] Compiled templated code crashes on delete []

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:48 --- Reopening to ... -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOP

[Bug c++/22609] delete [] called on base virtual destructor class [Segmentation failed]

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:47 --- *** Bug 23132 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/23132] Array delete'd through base class causes access violation in prog

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:47 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22609 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug driver/20705] -pthread should enable all options required to use pthreads on all platforms

--- Additional Comments From david dot nospam dot hopwood at blueyonder dot co dot uk 2005-07-29 11:46 --- -pthread is apparently deprecated on FreeBSD (see and

[Bug rtl-optimization/17950] Over Aggressive Use of Data Cache Touch Instructions During FDO

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:42 --- -fspeculative-prefetching has now been removed from the mainline. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/17491] -fspeculative-prefetching fails on powerpc-*

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:39 --- -fspeculative-prefetching has now been removed from the mainline. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/23131] [4.1 Regression] Fixincludes on cross-build is scanning /usr/include

-- What|Removed |Added Summary|Fixincludes on cross-build |[4.1 Regression] Fixincludes |is scanning /usr/include|on cross-build is scanning

[Bug tree-optimization/23128] [4.1 Regression] VRP fails for unsigned values

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:31 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added CC||phython at

[Bug tree-optimization/23127] [4.1 Regression] VRP propagates negation of antirange incorrectly

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 11:29 --- Fixed in 20050729 already by: 2005-07-27 James A. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR tree-optimization/22493 * tree-vrp.c (extract_range_from_unary_expr): Deal with -fwra

  1   2   >