[Bug libstdc++/28059] codecvt locale facet is broken (reproducible crash)

2006-06-18 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #25 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-06-18 09:35 --- (In reply to comment #24) > terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error' > what(): locale::facet::_S_create_c_locale name not valid This is the standard throw which happens when a named locale ca

[Bug libstdc++/28059] codecvt locale facet is broken (reproducible crash)

2006-06-18 Thread rleigh at debian dot org
--- Comment #26 from rleigh at debian dot org 2006-06-18 09:51 --- Thiemo Seufer diagnosed this as a problem with the testcases: mbstate_t needs explictly initialising to all-bits-zero with memset. After doing this std::memset(&state, 0, sizeof(mbstate_t)); all the testcases work fo

[Bug libstdc++/28059] codecvt locale facet is broken (reproducible crash)

2006-06-18 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #27 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-06-18 10:03 --- (In reply to comment #26) > Thiemo Seufer diagnosed this as a problem with the testcases: mbstate_t needs > explictly initialising to all-bits-zero with memset. After doing this > > std::memset(&state, 0, sizeof(mbstat

[Bug libstdc++/28059] codecvt locale facet is broken (reproducible crash)

2006-06-18 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #28 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-06-18 10:13 --- Correction, our testcases are already fine, zero_state does the job... Anyway... -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug ada/27243] ACATS: c37215h on hppa-linux

2006-06-18 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #2 from laurent at guerby dot net 2006-06-18 10:52 --- This works on x86 and x86_64 as of 20060615, do you know when it started to fail? BTW, according to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-06/msg00700.html cd5003e is failing on hppa-linux whereas it passes on x86 an

[Bug c/28045] Bitfield, &&, and optimization => bad code generation

2006-06-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-18 10:58 --- operand_equal_p (bD.1525.valD.1524, (long intD.2) bD.1525.valD.1524, 0) is true. make_range preserved the cast to (long int) for a reason, though. If we fix operand_equal_p, we no longer fold the test, but keep

[Bug middle-end/28045] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Bitfield, &&, and optimization => bad code generation

2006-06-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug middle-end/28034] [4.2 Regression] section anchors break -fprofile-generate

2006-06-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-18 16:35 --- Breakpoint 6, assemble_zeros (size=7976) at ../../gcc/varasm.c:1526 6170 assemble_zeros (SYMBOL_REF_BLOCK_OFFSET (symbol) - offset); (gdb) p debug_rtx(symbol) (symbol_ref:DI ("tmp") [flags 0x82] ) --

[Bug libmudflap/26864] multithreaded mudflap not working

2006-06-18 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #6 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-18 17:04 --- Frank, are you also going to apply this patch to the 4.0 and 4.1 branches? -- tbm at cyrius dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libmudflap/28077] New: [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha

2006-06-18 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
libmudflap.cth/pass39-frag.c (and I think pass37-frag.c) produce mudflap violations on Alpha. In dmesg, you get messages like these: pass39-frag.exe(7421): unaligned trap at 000120001ff8: b029001c2022000f 29 1 pass39-frag.exe(7552): unaligned trap at 000120001ff8: b029001c2022000f 29 1

[Bug libmudflap/28077] [4.1/4.2 regression] pass39-frag.c produces mudflap violation on alpha

2006-06-18 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-18 17:16 --- Created an attachment (id=11691) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11691&action=view) testsuite logs -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28077

[Bug fortran/26801] -fbounds-check generates segfault

2006-06-18 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-18 17:36 --- Subject: Bug 26801 Author: fxcoudert Date: Sun Jun 18 17:36:47 2006 New Revision: 114757 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114757 Log: PR fortran/26801 * trans-intrinsic.c (g

[Bug fortran/26801] [4.1 only] -fbounds-check generates segfault

2006-06-18 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.1.2 Known to work||4.2.0

[Bug fortran/18769] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer with array initialization with transfer

2006-06-18 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-18 19:43 --- Harald, The date at which you submitted this is an insult to my sensibilities; I hope that you appreciate the progress that we have made elsewhere and forgive us slowness in responding to this? That said, I have been

[Bug libfortran/25289] Cannot handle record numbers large than huge(0_4)

2006-06-18 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-18 21:01 --- I am taking a shot at this. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/27805] [4.2 regression] ICE with ptr-to-member of incomplete class

2006-06-18 Thread lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug c++/27821] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE with invalid ptr-to-member

2006-06-18 Thread lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug c++/28051] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE on invalid conversion operator

2006-06-18 Thread lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug c++/28054] [4.2 regression] ICE with friend declaration of invalid bitfield

2006-06-18 Thread lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug rtl-optimization/26244] [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-bitops-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops

2006-06-18 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #11 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-19 02:02 --- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-bitops-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointeO > could you please try to simplify the testcase, ideally to separate just the > single mis

[Bug ada/27243] ACATS: c37215h on hppa-linux

2006-06-18 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-06-19 02:17 --- Subject: Re: ACATS: c37215h on hppa-linux > BTW, according to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-06/msg00700.html > cd5003e is failing on hppa-linux whereas it passes on x86 and x86_64 and I > don'

[Bug libgomp/27254] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/reduction6.f90

2006-06-18 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 03:08 --- Subject: Bug 27254 Author: danglin Date: Mon Jun 19 03:07:54 2006 New Revision: 114765 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114765 Log: PR libgomp/27254 * io/unit.c (get_internal_un

[Bug libgomp/27254] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/reduction6.f90

2006-06-18 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 03:11 --- Fixed by patch. -- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|

[Bug testsuite/28078] New: Various testsuite fails with --enable-threads=single

2006-06-18 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
FAIL: PR18699 execution - source compiled test FAIL: PR18699 execution - gij test FAIL: PR18699 execution - bytecode->native test FAIL: PR18699 execution - gij test FAIL: PR18699 -findirect-dispatch execution - bytecode->native test FAIL: PR18699 -O3 execution - source compiled test FAIL: PR18699 e

[Bug middle-end/27802] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE with longjmp

2006-06-18 Thread sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 04:21 --- Subject: Bug 27802 Author: sayle Date: Mon Jun 19 04:21:22 2006 New Revision: 114766 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114766 Log: PR middle-end/27802 * reg-stack.c (subst_stack_r

[Bug preprocessor/28079] New: #line range not verified

2006-06-18 Thread sabre at nondot dot org
Preprocessing this: #line 12312312312435 produces: # 2936042099 ".../foo.c" C99 specifies that the argument to #line shall be > 0 and < 2^31-1, and even if it didn't, truncation like this should at least be warned about. -Chris -- Summary: #line range not verified Produ