[Bug fortran/22571] Reject derived types for dummy arguments declared in the subroutine unless they are SEQUENCE

2006-06-23 Thread paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
--- Comment #5 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-06-23 07:04 --- It should be noted that encasing the two subroutines in a module produces the correct error In file pr22571.f90:15 call a(q) 1 Error: Type/rank mismatch in argument 'p' at (1) The proble

[Bug target/27789] [4.2 Regression] attribute handling fallout from DECL_INITIAL changes

2006-06-23 Thread dannysmith at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from dannysmith at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 08:25 --- Subject: Bug 27789 Author: dannysmith Date: Fri Jun 23 08:25:33 2006 New Revision: 114927 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114927 Log: PR target/27789 * config/i386/winnt.c

[Bug target/27789] [4.2 Regression] attribute handling fallout from DECL_INITIAL changes

2006-06-23 Thread dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #5 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-06-23 08:27 --- Patch committed to trunk. Danny -- dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c/28120] The option -f[no-]inline-functions is invalid with -O2

2006-06-23 Thread tanaka at personal-media dot co dot jp
--- Comment #6 from tanaka at personal-media dot co dot jp 2006-06-23 09:52 --- Please answer my question again. It can not be distinguished between a function, which specified __inline__ and an another function, which is not specified __inline__, after gcc-3.4. This is sample. /**

[Bug middle-end/28045] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Bitfield, &&, and optimization => bad code generation

2006-06-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 09:52 --- Subject: Bug 28045 Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jun 23 09:52:40 2006 New Revision: 114929 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114929 Log: 2006-06-23 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR

[Bug middle-end/28045] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Bitfield, &&, and optimization => bad code generation

2006-06-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 09:57 --- Subject: Bug 28045 Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jun 23 09:57:37 2006 New Revision: 114930 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114930 Log: 2006-06-23 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug middle-end/28045] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Bitfield, &&, and optimization => bad code generation

2006-06-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 09:57 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug bootstrap/28082] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2006-06-23 Thread info at pion dot xs4all dot nl
--- Comment #3 from info at pion dot xs4all dot nl 2006-06-23 09:59 --- 1) I installed the patches which are mentioned in the installation documentation 2) Installed newer binutils 3) Checked on an other host 4) I have checked 4.1.0 which has the same problem 5) Could you give the detail

[Bug c/28120] The option -f[no-]inline-functions is invalid with -O2

2006-06-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 10:06 --- Newer gcc always inline _static_ functions that are used _once_ into their only caller (regardless of being declared inline or not). You can disable this behavior with -fno-inline-functions-called-once. All gcc inl

[Bug libstdc++/28125] Cannot build cross compiler for Solaris: configure: error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2006-06-23 Thread info at yourkit dot com
--- Comment #2 from info at yourkit dot com 2006-06-23 10:31 --- I've charged target from "i386-pc-solaris2.10" to "i386-pc-solaris2.9" and successfully built cross-compiler, but the resulting compiler cannot produce 64bit binaries (as expected, because Solaris9 on Intel is a 32bit). I

[Bug c++/28142] New: Template friend declaration and dependent names

2006-06-23 Thread wolfgang dot roehrl at gi-de dot com
Dear all, I would like to post a bug report for the GNU C/C++ compiler 3.3-e500. We use the compiler to generate code for a PowerPC processor. Used invokation line for the GNU C++ compiler: ccppc -c -x c++ -ansi -Wall -Werror -mcpu=8540 -fverbose-asm -mbig -fmerge-templates -mmultiple -mn

[Bug c++/28142] Template friend declaration and dependent names

2006-06-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 11:57 --- Fixed in 3.4.0. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|

[Bug other/25035] [4.1/4.2 regression] libssp causes a failure with cross compilers

2006-06-23 Thread info at yourkit dot com
--- Comment #9 from info at yourkit dot com 2006-06-23 12:09 --- I can confirm this bug. target=i386-pc-solaris2.10; host=i386-pc-linux-gnu; GCC 4.1.1; BinUtils 2.16.1 Checking multilib configuration... /bin/sh /home/anton/tmp/gcc/gcc-4.1.1/mkinstalldirs i386-pc-solaris2.10/libssp ;

[Bug libstdc++/28125] Cannot build cross compiler for Solaris: configure: error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES

2006-06-23 Thread info at yourkit dot com
--- Comment #3 from info at yourkit dot com 2006-06-23 12:28 --- I've discovered that if only C language is specified and --disable-libssp is added (to work around bug #25035) then cross complier can be successfully built. So the problem somewehere in C++ part. -- http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug fortran/27996] Compile time warn for: character(2) :: str = 'ABC' (expression truncated)

2006-06-23 Thread tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
--- Comment #1 from tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de 2006-06-23 13:01 --- Additional remarks (which I forget to make): Both cases are valid Fortran as: (1) If the length of 'variable' is less than that of 'expr', the value of 'expr' is truncated from the right until it

[Bug c/28143] New: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c execution FAIL on sparc64

2006-06-23 Thread christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
Well, I see gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c execution FAIL on sparc64, linux and solaris, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-06/msg00985.html, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-06/msg00962.html, and http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-06/msg00907.html. I still see it

[Bug tree-optimization/25737] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ACATS c974001 c974013 hang with struct aliasing

2006-06-23 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #29 from krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 15:16 --- On s390x c974001, c974013 and cb20001 run into a infinite loop with current mainline. At least the first two look related - not sure about the third. -- krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What

[Bug libstdc++/28080] header dependencies

2006-06-23 Thread chris at bubblescope dot net
--- Comment #7 from chris at bubblescope dot net 2006-06-23 15:33 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Subject: Re: header dependencies > > On Monday 19 June 2006 11:29, pcarlini at suse dot de wrote: > > --- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-06-19 09:29 > > Ok, let's see wha

[Bug fortran/25049] TRANSPOSE not allowed in initialisation expression

2006-06-23 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 15:40 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/25050] CSHIFT not allowed in initialization expression

2006-06-23 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 15:40 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/16206] rejects valid array initialization expression

2006-06-23 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 15:41 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/20876] Subroutine call in FORALL block not PURE

2006-06-23 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 15:42 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/18769] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer with array initialization with transfer

2006-06-23 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 15:43 --- Now for the hard work of writing simplify_transfer! Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18769

[Bug c++/11468] Deriving from CNI class java::lang::Object causing an ICE

2006-06-23 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 16:00 --- Subject: Bug 11468 Author: reichelt Date: Fri Jun 23 15:59:51 2006 New Revision: 114937 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114937 Log: PR c++/11468 * init.c (build_new_1): Handl

[Bug c++/11468] Deriving from CNI class java::lang::Object causing an ICE

2006-06-23 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 16:05 --- Fixed on mainline. Instead of bug.cc:55: internal compiler error: can't find class$ we now get a regular error with more information: bug.cc:55: error: can't find 'class$' in 'MyClass' -- reichelt at gcc

[Bug c++/11006] [CNI] ICE with use of __java_boolean

2006-06-23 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 16:08 --- The ICE internal compiler error: can't find class$ has been fixed on mainline (see PR 11468), but the ICE mentioned in commment #5 is still present. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11006

[Bug target/28084] [4.2 Regression] /usr/include/errno.h:28: error: previous declaration of 'int errno' with 'C++' linkage

2006-06-23 Thread sje at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from sje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 16:22 --- Subject: Bug 28084 Author: sje Date: Fri Jun 23 16:21:54 2006 New Revision: 114939 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114939 Log: PR target/28084 * inclhack.def (hpux_extern_errno): N

[Bug libstdc++/28080] header dependencies

2006-06-23 Thread gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
--- Comment #8 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2006-06-23 16:35 --- Subject: Re: header dependencies "chris at bubblescope dot net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I did implement a version of this myself, basically by writing a | mapper around each container that did a few st

[Bug tree-optimization/28144] New: floating point constant -> byte/char/short conversion is wrong for java

2006-06-23 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
According to: http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/conversions.doc.html#25363 java conversions of floating point values to integer types smaller than int should be done by converting to integer first, and then from int to the target type. While the former conversion is done with

[Bug c/28141] thread-local ptr initialized to address of thread-local misclassified as non-constant initializer

2006-06-23 Thread gary at intrepid dot com
--- Comment #2 from gary at intrepid dot com 2006-06-23 16:44 --- I agree this is definitely an enhancement, but will note the following: 1. On Fedora Core 5, x86_64, I was able to successfully link and run a null program (written in assembly) that initializes thread local 'ptr' that po

[Bug libstdc++/28080] header dependencies

2006-06-23 Thread chris at bubblescope dot net
--- Comment #9 from chris at bubblescope dot net 2006-06-23 16:47 --- I just tried preprocessing vector, as an example. There isn't any obvious low-hanging fruit. The major problem is that most of the C standard libary ends up getting dragged in. I think a better goal would be to make p

[Bug c++/28112] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE with invalid argument in attribute

2006-06-23 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 17:02 --- Subject: Bug 28112 Author: reichelt Date: Fri Jun 23 17:02:38 2006 New Revision: 114941 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114941 Log: PR c++/28112 * parser.c (cp_parser_attribu

[Bug c++/28112] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE with invalid argument in attribute

2006-06-23 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 17:06 --- Subject: Bug 28112 Author: reichelt Date: Fri Jun 23 17:06:13 2006 New Revision: 114942 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114942 Log: PR c++/28112 * parser.c (cp_parser_attribu

[Bug c++/28112] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE with invalid argument in attribute

2006-06-23 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 17:10 --- Subject: Bug 28112 Author: reichelt Date: Fri Jun 23 17:10:11 2006 New Revision: 114943 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114943 Log: PR c++/28112 * parser.c (cp_parser_attribu

[Bug c++/28112] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE with invalid argument in attribute

2006-06-23 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 17:11 --- Fixed on mainline, 4.1 branch, and 4.0 branch. -- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/28144] floating point constant -> byte/char/short conversion is wrong for java

2006-06-23 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 17:55 --- Created an attachment (id=11733) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11733&action=view) patch I'm currently testing this patch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28144

[Bug libstdc++/28145] New: libstdc++ and pthread cancellation are incompatible (at least with NPTL)

2006-06-23 Thread drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
(This is not a new problem, and everyone involved is familiar with it. I was just surprised not to find a record of it in bugzilla.) On targets using a recent version of glibc and the NPTL threading package, if you cancel a thread using pthread_cancel while it is writing to an ostream, you'll get

[Bug libstdc++/28145] libstdc++ and pthread cancellation are incompatible (at least with NPTL)

2006-06-23 Thread mark at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #1 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2006-06-23 18:14 --- Subject: Re: New: libstdc++ and pthread cancellation are incompatible (at least with NPTL) drow at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > On targets using a recent version of glibc and the NPTL threading package, if > you c

[Bug middle-end/27950] [4.2 regression] undefined reference when compiling valgrind 3.2.0

2006-06-23 Thread seongbae dot park at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from seongbae dot park at gmail dot com 2006-06-23 18:26 --- I'm able to reproduce the problem with 4.2.0 on linux/x86. valgrind-3.2.0/memcheck/mc_main.c has 359 static AuxMapEnt hacky_auxmaps[N_AUXMAPS]; ... 362 static AuxMapEnt* auxmap = &hacky_auxmaps[

[Bug bootstrap/28082] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2006-06-23 Thread info at pion dot xs4all dot nl
--- Comment #4 from info at pion dot xs4all dot nl 2006-06-23 18:31 --- It works now. First i installed gcc 3.4.6 and used that compiler (before that i used 3.2.1). Then i used the following configuration: Target: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 Configured with: /*/gcc-4.1.1/conf

[Bug middle-end/27950] [4.2 regression] undefined reference when compiling valgrind 3.2.0

2006-06-23 Thread seongbae dot park at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from seongbae dot park at gmail dot com 2006-06-23 18:43 --- The problem is causedby the extra DW_AT_const_value. 4.1.0 generates the following dwarf entry for auxmap: <1>: Abbrev Number: 31 (DW_TAG_variable) DW_AT_name: (indirect string, offset: 0x35e): au

[Bug bootstrap/28082] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2006-06-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 19:03 --- (In reply to comment #4) > It works now. > First i installed gcc 3.4.6 and used that compiler (before that i used 3.2.1). No more likely 3.2.1 was miscompiling part of 4.1.1. If you did not use "make bootstrap", that

[Bug target/28146] -O2 produces invalid code on s390-linux-gnu: gcc-4.1.2 20060608

2006-06-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 19:50 --- Can you please attach the preprocessed source rather than pasting it in? (I know there was no way to do so on the new bug page) Thanks! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28146

[Bug debug/28099] loses type in debug info

2006-06-23 Thread gin at mo dot msk dot ru
--- Comment #2 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2006-06-23 19:57 --- Subject: Re: loses type in debug info As for marking the bug as already reported, this seems plausible to me. Confirming that `.i' sent in my bug report uses "lost" type in exactly the same way as test code in PR 21391;

[Bug target/28146] -O2 produces invalid code on s390-linux-gnu: gcc-4.1.2 20060608

2006-06-23 Thread list+gcc-bugzilla at meyering dot net
--- Comment #2 from list+gcc-bugzilla at meyering dot net 2006-06-23 19:58 --- Created an attachment (id=11734) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11734&action=view) preprocessed input Here's the same j.i file, as an attachment. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show

[Bug target/28146] -O2 produces invalid code on s390-linux-gnu: gcc-4.1.2 20060608

2006-06-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 20:12 --- It produces 38b060a751ac96384cd9327eb1b1e36a21fdb71114be07434c0cc7bf63f6e1da274edebfe76f65fbd51ad2f14898b95b for me with -O and -O2. Can you post the output of gcc -I.. -I. -g -O2 ~/j.c -v ? -- http://gcc.gnu

[Bug target/28146] -O2 produces invalid code on s390-linux-gnu: gcc-4.1.2 20060608

2006-06-23 Thread list+gcc-bugzilla at meyering dot net
--- Comment #4 from list+gcc-bugzilla at meyering dot net 2006-06-23 20:26 --- Created an attachment (id=11735) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11735&action=view) Here's the output of running gcc -I.. -I. -g -O2 ~/j.c -v Here's the output of running gcc -I.. -I. -g

[Bug target/28146] -O2 produces invalid code on s390-linux-gnu: gcc-4.1.2 20060608

2006-06-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 21:03 --- Ok, looks like it is s390 specific because I can reproduce it with gcc version 4.1.2 20060531 (prerelease) /usr/lib/gcc/s390-suse-linux/4.1.2/cc1 -fpreprocessed t.i -quiet -dumpbase t.i -march=z900 -mtune=z9-109 -m31

[Bug fortran/27981] Strange error message for illegal integer constant

2006-06-23 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 21:05 --- Subject: Bug 27981 Author: kargl Date: Fri Jun 23 21:05:04 2006 New Revision: 114950 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114950 Log: 2006-06-23 Steven G. Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fort

[Bug fortran/27981] Strange error message for illegal integer constant

2006-06-23 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 21:12 --- Applied to trunk. I'll apply this to 4.1 in a few days. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/28146] -O2 produces invalid code on s390-linux-gnu: gcc-4.1.2 20060608

2006-06-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 21:15 --- trying to reduce it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28146

[Bug target/28138] [4.2 Regression] ext/pb_ds/example/basic_map.cc, etc fail: unaligned accesses at compile time

2006-06-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 21:29 --- Is this fixed now after Richard G.'s newest patch? -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/28138] [4.2 Regression] ext/pb_ds/example/basic_map.cc, etc fail: unaligned accesses at compile time

2006-06-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 21:31 --- It should be. Let's wait for new testresults. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28138

[Bug c++/27019] [4.1/4.2 regression] ICE with designated initializers

2006-06-23 Thread sje at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from sje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 21:53 --- Subject: Bug 27019 Author: sje Date: Fri Jun 23 21:53:36 2006 New Revision: 114952 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114952 Log: PR c++/27019 * typeck2.c (process_init_constructor_ar

[Bug c++/28114] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE with struct definition in argument of template function

2006-06-23 Thread sje at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from sje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 21:58 --- Subject: Bug 28114 Author: sje Date: Fri Jun 23 21:58:25 2006 New Revision: 114953 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114953 Log: PR c++/28114 * name-lookup.c (pushtag): Return if we

[Bug c++/28148] New: Internal error in varasm.c

2006-06-23 Thread donour at cs dot unm dot edu
I have a very simple piece of code that will produce the following error: -- test.C:5: internal compiler error: in output_constant, at varasm.c:4031 -- A simple code fragment to reproduce this bug is: -- struct foo { public: virtual int bar(int); }; void (foo::*__Virtual__foo__Var1)() = (void

[Bug c++/28148] Internal error in varasm.c

2006-06-23 Thread donour at cs dot unm dot edu
--- Comment #1 from donour at cs dot unm dot edu 2006-06-23 23:14 --- Created an attachment (id=11736) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11736&action=view) demo of reported behavior -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28148

[Bug libstdc++/27984] [4.2 Regression] installed libstdc++ testing broken

2006-06-23 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-23 23:43 --- Created an attachment (id=11737) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11737&action=view) fix -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27984

[Bug debug/28063] [4.2 regression] Dwarf no longer uses merged strings for DW_AT_comp_dir

2006-06-23 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfir

[Bug middle-end/27950] [4.2 regression] undefined reference when compiling valgrind 3.2.0

2006-06-23 Thread seongbae dot park at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from seongbae dot park at gmail dot com 2006-06-23 23:55 --- Looks like this indeed is a duplicate of 27657. In toplev.c: 1013 cgraph_varpool_assemble_pending_decls (); ... 1040 (*debug_hooks->finish) (main_input_filename); dwarf2 finish ends up calling final.

[Bug target/28138] [4.2 Regression] ext/pb_ds/example/basic_map.cc, etc fail: unaligned accesses at compile time

2006-06-23 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-06-23 23:59 --- Just tested and seems fixed indeed. Thanks a lot! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28138

[Bug libstdc++/27984] [4.2 Regression] installed libstdc++ testing broken

2006-06-23 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-24 00:13 --- Subject: Bug 27984 Author: bkoz Date: Sat Jun 24 00:13:08 2006 New Revision: 114955 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114955 Log: 2006-06-23 Benjamin Kosnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR libstd

[Bug libstdc++/28145] C++ (throw() and catch(...) {/* fall through */ } ) and pthread cancellation are incompatible (at least with NPTL)

2006-06-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-24 01:43 --- Actually I think the consensus was talk to the C++ and POSIX standards comittee about this case. It is not just libstdc++ that could cause problems but any program that uses throw() or catch(...) {/* fall through

[Bug debug/28099] loses type in debug info

2006-06-23 Thread pinskia at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2006-06-24 01:48 --- Subject: Re: loses type in debug info On Jun 23, 2006, at 12:57 PM, Ilya N. Golubev wrote: > >> Next time please don't paste the preprocessed source in gccbug or >> in the >> comments section in bugzilla. > > Please

[Bug target/28138] [4.2 Regression] ext/pb_ds/example/basic_map.cc, etc fail: unaligned accesses at compile time

2006-06-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-24 01:49 --- Lets close it as fixed then. Thanks. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/27019] [4.1 regression] ICE with designated initializers

2006-06-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-24 01:52 --- Fixed at least on the mainline. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/28114] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE with struct definition in argument of template function

2006-06-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-24 01:53 --- Confirmed, fixed at least on the mainline. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/28148] ICE with pointer to member function initializer and cast to a different type

2006-06-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-24 02:03 --- I cannot figure out if this is undefined code or not but it should not at least ICE. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/27984] [4.2 Regression] installed libstdc++ testing broken

2006-06-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-24 02:37 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug other/28145] C++ (throw() and catch(...) {/* fall through */ } ) and pthread cancellation are incompatible (at least with NPTL)

2006-06-23 Thread drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-24 02:52 --- No, that was not the consensus, and I reported this bug specifically because the coding practices used in libstdc++ cause problems with cancellation... progress was being made, the last time I read c++-pthreads, but tra

[Bug c++/28148] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with pointer to member function initializer and cast to a different type

2006-06-23 Thread donour at cs dot unm dot edu
--- Comment #3 from donour at cs dot unm dot edu 2006-06-24 03:45 --- Subject: Re: ICE with pointer to member function initializer and cast to a different type pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-24 02:03 > --- >

[Bug c++/28148] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with pointer to member function initializer and cast to a different type

2006-06-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-24 03:55 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Subject: Re: ICE with pointer to member function initializer > and cast to a different type > That should be legal ISO c++. That type of constuct is used actually > pretty common in spec

[Bug other/28145] C++ (throw() and catch(...) {/* fall through */ } ) and pthread cancellation are incompatible (at least with NPTL)

2006-06-23 Thread mark at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #4 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2006-06-24 04:10 --- Subject: Re: C++ (throw() and catch(...) {/* fall through */ } ) and pthread cancellation are incompatible (at least with NPTL) drow at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Comment #3 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot o

[Bug target/28084] [4.2 Regression] /usr/include/errno.h:28: error: previous declaration of 'int errno' with 'C++' linkage

2006-06-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-24 04:19 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW