--- Comment #17 from dirk dot behme at googlemail dot com 2006-07-22 06:24
---
Subject: Re: ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug
yfw dot debian at gmail dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #16 from yfw dot debian at gmail dot com 2006-07-22 06:21
> ---
> Col. pbrook.
> I will try the l
--- Comment #16 from yfw dot debian at gmail dot com 2006-07-22 06:21
---
Col. pbrook.
I will try the latest gcc snapshot.
Thanks a lot.
Regards
Yin, Fengwei
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27363
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-22 06:05
---
Fixed on 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Comment #12 from csm at gnu dot org 2006-07-22 05:23 ---
Subject: Re: java.security.InvalidAlgorithmParameterException
On Jul 21, 2006, at 5:31 PM, raif at swiftdsl dot com dot au wrote:
>
> --- Comment #11 from raif at swiftdsl dot com dot au
> 2006-07-22 00:31 ---
> a
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-22 03:18
---
Subject: Bug 28339
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jul 22 03:18:33 2006
New Revision: 115671
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115671
Log:
2006-07-21 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-22 03:14
---
Subject: Bug 28339
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jul 22 03:14:27 2006
New Revision: 115670
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115670
Log:
2006-07-21 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-22 02:01 ---
Steven,
I believe you're correct. I misread your patch where I thought
you were replacing the line above the one you added. Sorry about
the noise. I'll test and commit the patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
I saw a failure in this test while testing another patch. I reran the test a
number of times and couldn't reproduce it, but fortunately it prints out its
random seed. I hacked that value into the initial seed in
util/regression/rand/assoc/rand_regression_test.hpp, and now it fails 100% of
the tim
--- Comment #11 from raif at swiftdsl dot com dot au 2006-07-22 00:31
---
any objections to marking this PR as fixed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27228
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 23:56 ---
Subject: Bug 4105
Author: tromey
Date: Fri Jul 21 23:56:04 2006
New Revision: 115657
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115657
Log:
PR libgcj/4105:
* java/lang/natClass.cc (findInn
--- Comment #6 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 23:39 ---
The definition of gfc_evaluate_now is:
trans.h:tree gfc_evaluate_now (tree, stmtblock_t *);
And the effect of adding &se.pre is to add the code to the block. You can see
this going on everywhere in gfortran with a si
--- Comment #5 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 23:34 ---
Lahey agrees that this is invalid code:
1program test_string_present
2
3call test_present(1, "foo")
4call test_present(2)
5
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 22:50 ---
I think this is a bug in your glibc version where static linking glibc causes
TLS to be broken.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28456
ation of failure (segementation fault) with static linking:
% /tmp/irun/bin/gcc -v -g -static -fopenmp -I /tmp/irun/include openmp-test.c
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-linux
Configured with: ../gcc/configure
--prefix=/cosmic/coudert/tmp/gfortran-20060721/irun
--enable-languages=c,fortran --host=
--- Comment #9 from raffalli at univ-savoie dot fr 2006-07-21 22:01 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 regression] A file that
can not be compiled in reasonable time/space
hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org a écrit :
> --- Comment #8 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 21:11
> ---
--- Comment #11 from sje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 21:11 ---
Subject: Bug 26792
Author: sje
Date: Fri Jul 21 21:11:46 2006
New Revision: 115654
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115654
Log:
PR target/26792
* configure.ac: Use GCC_CHECK_UNWIND
--- Comment #8 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 21:11 ---
Hmm,
the function fi contains 3 calls, many of called functions contains further
calls.
Since our metric allows to replace each call by up to 10 instructions and we
allow fi to grow twice, we can end up with 600
--- Comment #10 from sje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 21:07 ---
Subject: Bug 26792
Author: sje
Date: Fri Jul 21 21:07:15 2006
New Revision: 115653
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115653
Log:
PR target/26792
* unwind_ipinfo.m4: New.
Added:
--- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 20:57 ---
Fixed by the patch.
--
daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|
--- Comment #2 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 20:49 ---
Subject: Bug 28426
Author: daney
Date: Fri Jul 21 20:49:06 2006
New Revision: 115650
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115650
Log:
libstdc++-v3/
PR libgcj/28426
* acinclude.m4: Add
--- Comment #6 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 20:36 ---
cgraph_analyze_function is reentrant for non-unit-at-a-time support. However
with unit-at-a-time, the analysis happens only after unit has been finalized
and at that time frontend is not supposed to come up with new
--- Comment #12 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 20:25
---
Testing patch.
Honza
--
hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ass
--- Comment #11 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 20:24
---
*** Bug 28270 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26655
--- Comment #1 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 20:24 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26655 ***
--
hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-07-21 19:35 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c/28419
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-07/msg00910.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
Currently defineclass.cc may rewrite utf-8 constant pool entries
as it works. This is incorrect; the rewriting should be done when
the pool entry is resolved. I haven't yet tried to construct a
test case that shows a failure.
--
Summary: [ecj] defineclass.cc rewrites constant pool
--- Comment #1 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 19:31 ---
Testing patch.
Honza
--
hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assign
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 19:31 ---
Yes, this is most likely one of the accepts invalid bugs where gfortran does
not check the types of functions arguments already implicatedly defined.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28443
The gcj-eclipse branch has most of the code needed for runtime annotation
support. however a few things are missing:
* Annotations are not instantiated yet. Some new code from Classpath 0.92
is needed for this.
* Annotations should be cached when created.
* 'c' and 'e' types in annotations are
The gcj-eclipse branch has runtime support for extended reflection
data, but no compiler support as yet. See defineclass.cc and natClass.cc
to see what is required.
--
Summary: [ecj] compiler support for reflection data
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
St
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from ian at airs dot com 2006-07-21 18:05 ---
Please send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] first. When that process is
complete, send the patch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks!
--
ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #11 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 17:07
---
Unless reg-stack is told how to reschedule the instructions to match register
stack constraints, I don't think we can get much closer to solving the problem
that some instruction orderings needs a lot more fxchs th
--- Comment #10 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 16:57 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Case 1:
> There is no location info for the parameter x because it has been optimized
> away. Change the variable x in main to y to avoid ambiguity, compile with
> -fdump-tree-all, and look
--- Comment #7 from anemo at mba dot ocn dot ne dot jp 2006-07-21 16:34
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Thanks. With this patch, gcc 4.1.1 produces expected output.
> It seems gcc 4.2 does not move rdhwr before branch without this patch, but I
> can not see why.
I tried to find the rea
The programme
program rand10
real*10 x
call random_number (x)
end program rand10
fails during linking with
$ ~/gcc/bin/gfortran -o rand10 rand10.f90
/usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols:
__gfortran_random_r10
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
$ ~/gcc/bin/gfortran --version
GNU Fortran 95 (GCC)
--- Comment #13 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2006-07-21 15:13 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] tree check ICE when attribute
externally_visible used
>
>
> --- Comment #12 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 08:38
> ---
> I think that Comment #10 shows that ha
--- Comment #10 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 15:12
---
> Not sure why Volker didn't mark it as resolved, but since it is, I will.
Just forgot to push the button.
Btw, assigning the PR to you if you are working on it (or posted a patch)
and closing it if you fixed it
--- Comment #9 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-07-21 15:03 ---
Not sure why Volker didn't mark it as resolved, but since it is, I will.
--
sje at cup dot hp dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.4
http://gc
The following invalid code snippet triggers an ICE since GCC 3.4.0:
=
template struct A {};
template struct B
{
A<> a;
A<> b;
};
=
bug.cc:1: error: expected primary-expression before '=' token
bug.cc:6: internal compiler
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28450
--- Comment #10 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 13:22 ---
Subject: Bug 28283
Author: sayle
Date: Fri Jul 21 13:22:31 2006
New Revision: 115644
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115644
Log:
PR middle-end/28283
* expmed.c (expand_shift):
Each of the following lines triggers an ICE since GCC 3.3:
===
void* p = new __complex__ int ();
void* q = new int __attribute__((vector_size(8))) ();
===
bug.cc:1: internal compiler error: in
--- Comment #29 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 12:31
---
I have a backport to the branch in testing and can confirm it fixes 27795,
27639 and 26719.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27639
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 12:27 ---
Backporting the fixes fixes this bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27795
--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-07-21 12:25 ---
Subject: Bug number PR28029
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-07/msg00895.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 11:00 ---
Backporting
Author: dberlin
Date: Wed Feb 15 22:09:45 2006
New Revision: 20
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=20
Log:
2006-02-15 Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...
* tree-ss
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 10:41 ---
On the mainline we produce
Variable: D.1848, UID 1848, float *, symbol memory tag: SMT.4
Variable: D.1851, UID 1851, const float *, symbol memory tag: SMT.4
while 4.1 branch does
Variable: D.1604, UID 1604, float
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 10:35 ---
This looks like a data-ref bug or an aliasing issue.
tree-data-ref.c:object_analysis get's for the statement
(gdb) call debug_generic_expr (stmt)
# VUSE ;
D.2129_17 = *D.2128_12
as it calls get_var_ann on D.2128
--- Comment #9 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 10:17
---
> Could this be a dup of the now-fixed Bug 28410 ?
No, because this one is still present.
(Or the fix in PR 28410 is incomplete.)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28003
--- Comment #8 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 10:11
---
Fixed on mainline, 4.1 branch, and 4.0 branch.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #8 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 10:05
---
Alas there's some fallout from the fix.
The first issue has been fixed (see comment #5 and #7), another problem
remains, though (see also comment #6):
void foo()
{
try { throw; }
--- Comment #7 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 10:00
---
Subject: Bug 28250
Author: reichelt
Date: Fri Jul 21 09:59:57 2006
New Revision: 115643
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115643
Log:
PR c++/28250
* pt.c (tsubst_expr): Only ap
--- Comment #7 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 09:53
---
Fixed on mainline, 4.1 branch, and 4.0 branch.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 09:50
---
Subject: Bug 28363
Author: reichelt
Date: Fri Jul 21 09:50:08 2006
New Revision: 115642
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115642
Log:
PR c++/28363
* semantics.c (check_template
--- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 09:44
---
Subject: Bug 28363
Author: reichelt
Date: Fri Jul 21 09:44:04 2006
New Revision: 115641
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115641
Log:
PR c++/28363
* semantics.c (check_template
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 09:41
---
Subject: Bug 28363
Author: reichelt
Date: Fri Jul 21 09:41:16 2006
New Revision: 115640
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115640
Log:
PR c++/28363
* semantics.c (check_template
--- Comment #12 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 08:38
---
I think that Comment #10 shows that handle_externally_visible should not be
registering things with cgraph, as we shouldn't ever have anything pointing at
a re-declaration.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28363
--- Comment #3 from matthias dot langer at zamg dot ac dot at 2006-07-21
08:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=11917)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11917&action=view)
comment
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28443
61 matches
Mail list logo
