--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 06:31
---
Still more reduced testcase:
module gfcbug45
implicit none
contains
subroutine foo
integer :: i
real:: a
real, parameter :: eps(1) = (/ 1 /)
i = 1
a = sum (eps(i:i) * eps)
end subro
--- Comment #16 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 06:24
---
Fixed on all active release branches.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #15 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 06:19
---
Subject: Bug 27895
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Tue Nov 14 06:19:04 2006
New Revision: 118805
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118805
Log:
PR libfortran/27895
* intrinsics/cshif
--- Comment #14 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 06:18
---
Subject: Bug 27895
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Tue Nov 14 06:18:36 2006
New Revision: 118804
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118804
Log:
PR libfortran/27895
* intrinsics/resha
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 06:08 ---
No feedback in 3 months so closing.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 06:07 ---
building inside the src directory is not really supported.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 06:06 ---
No feedback in 3 months so closing.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 05:21 ---
std::string a();
This declares a function that returns std::string.
This is what the C++ standard says how to resolve this ambigous statement.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #1 from diltsman at gmail dot com 2006-11-14 05:18 ---
I neglected to comment that the command line was:
g++ test.cpp
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29824
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 05:17
---
Fixed in 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summa
#include
int main()
{
std::string a();
a="alskdfjasdj";
return 0;
}
output:
test.cpp: In function int main():
test.cpp:6: error: assignment of function std::string a()
test.cpp:6: error: cannot convert const char [12] to std::string ()() in
assignment
#include
int main()
{
std
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 05:11
---
Subject: Bug 29106
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue Nov 14 05:11:32 2006
New Revision: 118803
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118803
Log:
PR c++/29106
* init.c (constant_value_1):
--- Comment #19 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 05:00
---
Fixed in 4.1.2, 4.2.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 04:59
---
Subject: Bug 29518
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue Nov 14 04:59:48 2006
New Revision: 118801
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118801
Log:
PR c++/29518
* pt.c (coerce_template_parm
--- Comment #9 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 04:53 ---
Subject: Re: DWARF: Not all inline concrete instances are being generated
On 13 Nov 2006 16:16:50 -, acme at mandriva dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #8 from acme at mandriva dot com 2
On 13 Nov 2006 16:16:50 -, acme at mandriva dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Comment #8 from acme at mandriva dot com 2006-11-13 16:16 ---
> > OK, I thought that this was due to something like what you described, even
not
> > knowing that much about gcc internals, but I thou
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 04:34 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #24 from ppluzhnikov at charter dot net 2006-11-14 04:26
---
Created an attachment (id=12615)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12615&action=view)
annotated transcript
Might the problem be that I am compiling on an "old" glibc?
Or that you didn't invoke ./
--- Comment #2 from wfragg at gmail dot com 2006-11-14 04:01 ---
The patch mentioned in mailing list does not solves the problem (and this is
stated in one of the reply). It just demonstrates the problem.
If this problem was solved - that's fine, just close the bug. Yesterday I
realized
--- Comment #23 from fche at redhat dot com 2006-11-14 03:53 ---
As I said in comment 16, this problem isn't limited to C++ code either.
> Instrument gmake-3.81, and you'll get 100,000+ violations
Sorry, I don't see that.
configured gnu make 3.81
compiled with mainline, CFLAGS="-fmudfl
--- Comment #2 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-11-14 03:45 ---
I believe the code is in fact invalid, based on 14.3.2/1 and this wording
in 14.3.2/5:
-- For a non-type template-parameter of type pointer to member
function, no conversions apply.
The latter referen
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 03:28
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--- Comment #17 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 03:28
---
Subject: Bug 26994
Author: pinskia
Date: Tue Nov 14 03:28:17 2006
New Revision: 118800
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118800
Log:
2006-11-13 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
// gcc-bug: attribute((sentinel)) warning does not trigger for member function
template
//
// how to reproduce: g++-4.1.1 -Wall -c test.cpp
// Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
#define SENTINEL __attribute__((__sentinel__))
void func1(const char *, ...) SENTINE
--- Comment #7 from sergstesh at yahoo dot com 2006-11-14 02:54 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > We can make a deal: I obfuscate and publish the code, you guys fix the
> > bug preserving, if possible, performance.
> >
> > The code is really complex, and it's n
--- Comment #6 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-11-14 02:29 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> We can make a deal: I obfuscate and publish the code, you guys fix the
> bug preserving, if possible, performance.
>
> The code is really complex, and it's not realistic for me to make it smal
--- Comment #5 from sergstesh at yahoo dot com 2006-11-14 01:36 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > I am developing pretty heavy SSE-based code, and performance-wise gcc-3.4.6
> > is
> > the best so far. Sorry, I cant' post the code, but here are performance
> >
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 01:23
---
Try -fno-range-check or use standard conforming methods.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29814
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bonzini at gnu dot org
Severity|major
--- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-11-14 01:17 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I am developing pretty heavy SSE-based code, and performance-wise gcc-3.4.6 is
> the best so far. Sorry, I cant' post the code, but here are performance
> figures (output of 'time' command):
Then
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 01:15 ---
This is mostly PR 28367. There are most likely other issues like some of the
SSE intrinsics not being declared as pure/const.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 01:10 ---
Ah, I see the problem. The code I removed from the C and C++ front ends was
redundant with code in layout_decl, except that the code in layout_decl
deliberately ignores DECL_PACKED for fields of variable size.
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 01:06 ---
This is a problem of our VOPs not having base+offset and has nothing to do with
restrict.
int f(int *r)
{
r[0] = 0;
r[1] = 0;
if(r[0]) foo();
}
is enough to reproduce the issue. Also I think there might be
--- Comment #3 from sergstesh at yahoo dot com 2006-11-14 01:04 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> You should note that 3.4.x is no longer being maintained so this bug will most
> likely be closed as fixed as you already mention it works in 4.1.1.
>
That's too bad.
I am developing pretty
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 01:00 ---
AIX "threading" is always enabled. Note this threading model is only for
libstdc++, exceptions, and libobjc and not your own program.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29817
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 00:57 ---
In fact it is.
#ifdef _THREAD_SAFE
#include "gthr-posix.h"
#else
#include "gthr-single.h"
#endif
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 00:55 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> I am compiling with a gcc-4.1.1 binary that someone else had built. The
> reason
> I am not using his binary is because I need a posix threading model. Am I
> doing something wrong?
II
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 00:53 ---
You should note that 3.4.x is no longer being maintained so this bug will most
likely be closed as fixed as you already mention it works in 4.1.1.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29818
--- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-11-14 00:53 ---
I have analized in detail the case at issue (resize to the same size of the
current one) and came to the conclusion that trying to optimize for it (at the
cost of increasing the size of the inlined function) isn't really wo
--- Comment #23 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 23:42 ---
fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #22 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 23:31 ---
Subject: Bug 28915
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 13 23:31:16 2006
New Revision: 118786
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118786
Log:
PR middle-end/28915
* gimplify.c (gimplify_init_
--- Comment #18 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 23:03 ---
Richard's testsuite change is now on the 4.1 branch, so the test passes again
there.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28651
--- Comment #10 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 23:01 ---
Subject: Bug 28703
Author: janis
Date: Mon Nov 13 23:01:09 2006
New Revision: 118782
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118782
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2006-08-14 Richard Guen
--- Comment #19 from tom_gall at mac dot com 2006-11-13 22:32 ---
This is still an issue and I'm seeing it on both my power3 and power4 hardware
using gcc 4.1.1 and glibc 2.5, granted using gcc 3.3.6 to build libstdc++.so.5
It's of interest as there are several pieces of proprietary sof
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 21:39 ---
Slightly reduced test case:
module gfcbug45
implicit none
type cartesian
real :: x(2)
end type cartesian
contains
subroutine foo (z)
type(cartesian), intent(in) :: z
integer :: i
real:: a
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2006-11-13 21:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=12612)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12612&action=view)
ICE demo code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29821
Hi,
here's another one:
gfcbug45.f90: In function 'foo':
gfcbug45.f90:8: internal compiler error: in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at
fortran/trans-types.c:666
Sample code attached.
Enough for tonight...
--
Summary: ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-
type
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 21:18 ---
Funny enough, gfortran does not crash when one reverts the order of point and
plane.
Debug information:
In trans-expr.c's gfc_trans_scalar_assign
gfc_add_block_to_block (&block, &lse->pre);
gfc_add_block
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 20:03 ---
Here is a shorter testcase:
module geo
type geodetic
real :: h
end type geodetic
end module geo
module gfcbug44
implicit none
contains
subroutine point ( gp)
use geo
type(geodetic), intent(out) :: gp
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2006-11-13 19:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=12611)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12611&action=view)
Demo code provoking ICE
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29820
Hi,
the attached code exhibits an ICE:
gfcbug44.f90: In function 'point':
gfcbug44.f90:28: internal compiler error: in fold_convert, at fold-const.c:2146
Cheers,
-ha
--
Summary: ICE in fold_convert, at fold-const.c:2146
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
--- Comment #6 from thomas at reactsoft dot com 2006-11-13 19:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=12610)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12610&action=view)
Updated patch against the gcc-4_1-branch
The posted patch works fine, it fixes compilation errors of some win32 CO
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 19:54 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 19:44 ---
Subject: Bug 29759
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Nov 13 19:44:23 2006
New Revision: 118774
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118774
Log:
PR fortran/29759
* fortran/scanner.c (skip_free_c
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 19:43 ---
Subject: Bug 29759
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Nov 13 19:42:55 2006
New Revision: 118773
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118773
Log:
PR fortran/29759
* fortran/scanner.c (skip_free_c
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 19:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=12609)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12609&action=view)
newest version
Here's the newest version of the patch, which does
reading and backspace, plus defaults to four-
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-11-13 18:55 ---
Subject: Bug number PR29806
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg00871.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #21 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 18:55 ---
Subject: Bug 28915
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Nov 13 18:55:08 2006
New Revision: 118772
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118772
Log:
2006-11-12 Jason Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Andrew Pi
--- Comment #20 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 18:53 ---
Subject: Bug 28915
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Nov 13 18:53:27 2006
New Revision: 118771
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118771
Log:
2006-11-12 Jason Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Andrew Pi
--- Comment #1 from mtrudel at gmx dot ch 2006-11-13 18:48 ---
Why do you make a bugreport if there's already a fix for that?
Did no one reply to your patch or don't you have copyright assignment?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29812
--- Comment #17 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 18:41
---
Subject: Bug 29518
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon Nov 13 18:41:26 2006
New Revision: 118770
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118770
Log:
PR c++/29518
* pt.c (coerce_template_parm
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 18:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=12608)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12608&action=view)
Implementation of VALUE and three testcases
This patch is regtesting as I write; I have to leave right now, so I
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
Component|c |target
http:
--- Comment #17 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 18:01 ---
The version of the test in mainline was modified to not check argc; I'll
backport Richard's test fix to 4.1.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28651
--- Comment #16 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 17:54 ---
I a saw a failure for this when testing backported testsuite changes, but it
passed when I ran it alone (with execute.exp=pr28651.c in RUNTESTFLAGS). I'm
testing it again now to see if the failure is intermittent, or
--- Comment #16 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 17:52
---
Fixed in 4.3.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summ
--- Comment #15 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 17:49
---
Subject: Bug 29518
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon Nov 13 17:49:43 2006
New Revision: 118768
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118768
Log:
PR c++/29518
* pt.c (coerce_template_parm
--- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 17:48
---
Subject: Bug 29518
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon Nov 13 17:48:28 2006
New Revision: 118767
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118767
Log:
PR c++/29518
* pt.c (coerce_template_parm
If one compiles with -std=f95 the following program:
---
! { dg-do compile }
! { dg-options "-std=f2003" }
! Check whether empty contains are allowd
module x
contains
end module x ! { dg-error "CONTAINS statement must be followed by a FUNCTION or
SUBROUTINE statement" }
progra
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 16:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=12607)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12607&action=view)
gcc43-pr29581.patch
Yeah, found that out too earlier today.
This is the fix which I have regtested, including
RUN
--- Comment #1 from sergstesh at yahoo dot com 2006-11-13 16:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=12606)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12606&action=view)
source code which causes the segfault under gcc-3.4.6 and runs fine under
gcc-4.1.1
The file is the result -save-te
A (now pretty simple) piece of code segfaults when compiled with gcc-3.4.6,
but runs fine with gcc-4.1.1.
The offending line is:
vtmp1.v = *(vFloat *)&inp_array_1[bn];
-please wait until upload the source file.
Both gcc-3.4.6 and gcc-4.1.1 were built by myself; the same code segfaults
when c
--- Comment #7 from manuel dot serrano at inria dot fr 2006-11-13 16:33
---
The problem is solved.
The error IS NOT IN GCC.
I feel totally stupid and I present my most humbles excuses to everyone that
has lost time because of my false bug report.
The error (of course) was in my code
--- Comment #8 from acme at mandriva dot com 2006-11-13 16:16 ---
> > OK, I thought that this was due to something like what you described, even
> > not
> > knowing that much about gcc internals, but I thought that even in this case
> > the
> > DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine would be emitte
--- Comment #7 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 16:00 ---
Subject: Re: DWARF: Not all inline concrete instances are being generated
On 12 Nov 2006 20:39:43 -, acme at mandriva dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #5 from acme at mandriva dot com 2
On 12 Nov 2006 20:39:43 -, acme at mandriva dot com
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Comment #5 from acme at mandriva dot com 2006-11-12 20:39 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The only thing left from __task_rq_lock is a label.
> task_cpu were inlined and we constant proped the valu
Hello,
I configured gcc 4.1.1 under AIX 5.3 with the following:
../gcc-4.1.1/configure --enable-threads=posix --enable-tls
--enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats --enable-languages=c,c++
when I do a "gcc -v" it says this:
Thread model: aix
I believe it should say "posix".
I am compiling with a gcc
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 14:51 ---
GCC 3.4.x is out of maintainance, can you try with at least 4.0.3 or 4.1.1?
Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29815
--- Comment #19 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 14:46
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 14:46
---
Subject: Bug 29439
Author: pinskia
Date: Mon Nov 13 14:46:05 2006
New Revision: 118763
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118763
Log:
2006-11-13 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #19 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 14:41
---
Fixed in at least 4.2.0 and the trunk.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 14:38
---
Fixed on the mainline at least.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 14:36
---
Subject: Bug 26994
Author: pinskia
Date: Mon Nov 13 14:36:09 2006
New Revision: 118761
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118761
Log:
2006-11-12 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #6 from manuel dot serrano at inria dot fr 2006-11-13 14:12
---
Created an attachment (id=12605)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12605&action=view)
The generated .i file that shows the problem
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29816
--- Comment #5 from manuel dot serrano at inria dot fr 2006-11-13 14:12
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Can you just attach the preprocessed source? which can be found via
> -save-temps
> and it is names "something".i.
>
The end of the bug report contains the source of the faulty funct
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 14:09 ---
> error: statement makes a memory store, but has no V_MAY_DEFS nor V_MUST_DEFS
> perfecttmp.42 = perfectiv.40_5 + 16;
> I called update_stmt, o not sure what I'm still missing.
You forgot to mark perfecttmp.42 for r
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 14:05 ---
Can you just attach the preprocessed source? which can be found via -save-temps
and it is names "something".i.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29816
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 13:59 ---
*** Bug 29814 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 13:59 ---
Gfortran is doing the correct thing for BOZs.
This is a dup of bug 24828.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 24828 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from manuel dot serrano at inria dot fr 2006-11-13 13:55
---
Created an attachment (id=12604)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12604&action=view)
second header file needed to compile the code given with the bug entry.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #2 from manuel dot serrano at inria dot fr 2006-11-13 13:55
---
Created an attachment (id=12603)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12603&action=view)
One of the two needed .h file
In order to compile the source code given with that bug, you need to header
--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 13:54
---
Reopening since part of the patch was reverted.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #38 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 13:54
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 13:47 ---
Can you attach sources that actually compile because the sources you gave so
far cannot compile as there is no typedef for obj_t.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
Component|c |target
http:
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29815
Enabling optimization (starting with -O option) the following code is
erroneously compiled:
obj_t BGl_GLOPz00zz__evmeaningz00(obj_t BgL_codez00_1, obj_t BgL_stackz00_2) {
AN_OBJECT;
obj_t BgL_g1120z00_632;
obj_t BgL_vectorz00_1820;
int BgL_kz00_1821;
BgL_vectorz00_1820 = BgL_
--- Comment #14 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 12:37
---
Subject: Bug 14784
Author: rakdver
Date: Mon Nov 13 12:37:29 2006
New Revision: 118754
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118754
Log:
PR tree-optimization/29680
* tree-ssa-opera
--- Comment #37 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 12:37
---
Subject: Bug 29680
Author: rakdver
Date: Mon Nov 13 12:37:29 2006
New Revision: 118754
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118754
Log:
PR tree-optimization/29680
* tree-ssa-opera
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
