SVN 20070414, fails building gnatlib.
Matthias
/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20070414/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20070414/build/./gcc/
-B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/sparc-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/sparc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/sparc-linux-gnu
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31167
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 07:09 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 07:08 ---
Some of this is not a GCC bug but a binutils one I think or maybe not a bug at
all.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31350
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 07:05 ---
Confirmed, not a regression as far as I can tell.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 06:49 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 06:47 ---
Can you show how you build GCC because there are a lot of checks that "checking
whether byte ordering is bigendian" does, the macros check is only one of many.
It also tries to do an object test and then last a runt
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 06:43 ---
There are a couple of ways of fixing this bug, folding while going out of ssa.
Doing a tree combined which is PR 15459. Or the patch which I attached.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 06:32
---
I can reproduce this with -O2, with -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing, the infinite loop
goes away so this might be an aliasing violation.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 06:32
---
But note this was with a compiler from March 9th so this might already be
fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31268
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31361
--- Comment #50 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 02:55
---
Patch committed to trunk.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31052
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 02:51 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRM
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 02:36 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 02:33 ---
Subject: Bug 30045
Author: pinskia
Date: Sun Apr 15 02:33:02 2007
New Revision: 123841
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123841
Log:
2007-04-14 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR tr
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 02:33 ---
Fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30045
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 02:28 ---
Subject: Bug 30729
Author: pinskia
Date: Sun Apr 15 02:28:09 2007
New Revision: 123840
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123840
Log:
2007-04-14 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR mi
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 02:28 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 02:24
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 02:24
---
Subject: Bug 30168
Author: pinskia
Date: Sun Apr 15 02:24:00 2007
New Revision: 123839
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123839
Log:
2007-04-14 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 02:20 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 02:20 ---
Subject: Bug 31520
Author: pinskia
Date: Sun Apr 15 02:20:33 2007
New Revision: 123838
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123838
Log:
2007-04-14 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c/
--- Comment #10 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 02:17
---
Subject: Bug 31500
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Apr 15 02:17:41 2007
New Revision: 123837
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123837
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/31500
* gcc.dg/Warray-b
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 02:10 ---
Subject: Bug 31520
Author: pinskia
Date: Sun Apr 15 02:10:22 2007
New Revision: 123836
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123836
Log:
2007-04-14 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c/
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 01:59 ---
Fixed on the mainline, testing for the 4.2/4.1 branches.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 01:59 ---
Subject: Bug 31520
Author: pinskia
Date: Sun Apr 15 01:59:15 2007
New Revision: 123835
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123835
Log:
2007-04-14 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c/
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 01:36 ---
And the reason is:
/* See if we can use an ordinary integer mode for a bit-field.
Conditions are: a fixed size that is correct for another mode
and occupying a complete byte or byt
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 01:30 ---
DECL_BIT_FIELD is false for this decl but bit_field_type is true.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31541
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 01:05 ---
Note this was fixed at the tree level by:
2007-04-08 Jan Hubicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* tree.h (maybe_fold_offset_to_component_ref): Declare.
* tree-ssa-ccp.c (maybe_fold_offset_to_component_ref): E
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 00:58 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I believe that this change will pessimize alias analysis somewhat; improved
> alias analysis was the reason for my change to model base access with
> COMPONENT_REF. But I'll leave this alo
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 00:56 ---
Confirmed, reduced testcase:
static const __attribute__((altivec(vector__))) unsigned char array[16];
static __attribute__((altivec(vector__))) unsigned char
f1(__attribute__((altivec(vector__))) unsigned char in)
{
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 00:54 ---
I believe that this change will pessimize alias analysis somewhat; improved
alias analysis was the reason for my change to model base access with
COMPONENT_REF. But I'll leave this alone until I get around to doing th
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 00:44 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 23:55 ---
Randon register allocation fluctuations.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #3 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-04-14 22:24
---
Subject: Re: -Wall-all to enable all warnings
> --- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 21:18
> ---
> Actually more than that, there are new warnings options each release so really
--- Comment #49 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-04-14 22:09 ---
(In reply to comment #48)
> Created an attachment (id=13365)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13365&action=view) [edit]
> A possible fix for sixtrack, again and again
>
> hjl,
>
> Would you please tr
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25874
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 21:18 ---
Actually more than that, there are new warnings options each release so really
if we have this we will get complaints about warnings options get added. so I
am going to close this as won't fix.
--
pinskia at gcc
--- Comment #2 from dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2007-04-14
21:03 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This looks completely a register allocator issue and I think 4.2.0 and before
> were just getting lucky.
Also note that the extra push+pop are NOT generated when using -march=i3
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 20:50 ---
This looks completely a register allocator issue and I think 4.2.0 and before
were just getting lucky.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #14 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 20:44 ---
Fixed in SVN.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIG
For this code:
struct data {
unsigned data[4][1];
unsigned char valid[4];
unsigned char flags[4];
};
void
def(struct data *info, int index, unsigned *v)
{
if (info->flags[index]) {
info->valid[index] = 1;
info->data[index][0] = v[0];
}
}
SVN HEAD generates an
--- Comment #1 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-04-14 20:27
---
That begs the question: what's *not* covered by -W -Wall -Wextra [-ansi
-pedantic-errors -Werror]?
There are also some warning flags that are parameterized (-Wstrict-aliasing=#,
-Wformat=#), should those be maxed
--- Comment #48 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 20:19
---
Created an attachment (id=13365)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13365&action=view)
A possible fix for sixtrack, again and again
hjl,
Would you please try this patch and see if it resol
--- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 19:52 ---
Subject: Bug 25874
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Apr 14 19:52:45 2007
New Revision: 123822
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123822
Log:
PR c++/25874
* omp-low.c (expand_omp_parallel):
--- Comment #7 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 19:33 ---
Subject: Bug 21061
Author: aldot
Date: Sat Apr 14 19:33:11 2007
New Revision: 123820
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123820
Log:
2007-04-14 Bernhard Fischer
PR fortran/21061
*
--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-04-14 19:15 ---
Subject: Bug number PR31201
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00863.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 18:43 ---
Subject: Bug 25874
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Apr 14 18:43:13 2007
New Revision: 123818
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123818
Log:
PR c++/25874
* omp-low.c (expand_omp_parallel):
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 18:10
---
Fixed.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 18:09
---
Subject: Bug 31561
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sat Apr 14 18:09:41 2007
New Revision: 123817
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123817
Log:
PR fortran/31561
* gfortran.dg/vect/vect
--- Comment #5 from tprince at computer dot org 2007-04-14 17:59 ---
I tested successfully the patch proposed by dorit, which changes the report of
these 2 cases to XFAIL for vect_no_align target:
Index: vect-4.f90
===
---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 15:43 ---
These testcases are testing SSE4/SSSE3 so if your binutils is not need enough
they are going to fail with assembly errors which is happening.
These testcases are hard to fix for older binutils.
--
pinskia at gcc
Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4
.3/objdir/gcc/
/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/libffi/testsuite/libffi.call/cls_6byte
.c -O3 -I/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/./libffi/include
-I/home/dav
e/gnu/gcc-4.3/gcc/libffi/testsuite/../include
-I/home/d
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 15:10 ---
Subject: Bug 31404
Author: pault
Date: Sat Apr 14 15:09:57 2007
New Revision: 123815
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123815
Log:
2007-04-14 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/29
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 15:10 ---
Subject: Bug 29507
Author: pault
Date: Sat Apr 14 15:09:57 2007
New Revision: 123815
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123815
Log:
2007-04-14 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/29
The ability to enable absolutely all warnings (-Wall -Wextra -Wyada-yada-yada),
and then selectively disable the one's that are not desired. Rather than the
opposite.
Example:
g++ -c -Wall-all -Wno-unreachable-code -Wno-long-long -Wno-four-char-constants
test.cpp -o test.o
--
Summar
There are testsuite failures on i386-linux for tests named sse* (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-04/msg00689.html for example). We
should probably not run them there.
--
Summary: Testsuite failures on i386-pc-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 12:57 ---
I need to update it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30965
--- Comment #3 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-04-14 11:00 ---
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00129.html
should this one be pinged ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30965
--- Comment #4 from dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2007-04-14 09:38 ---
> I think the only thing that really matters is that the loop is vectorized. I
> don't think the alignment details are important checking, even on platforms
> where they are relevant. So we should remove all scan-tree-d
--- Comment #17 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 08:38
---
*** Bug 31571 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-14 08:38 ---
>this did pass in 20070403.
No it did not.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 31344 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
SVN 20070414 fails to bootstrap, this did pass in 20070403.
Matthias
/scratch/packages/gcc/snap/gcc-snapshot-20070414/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/scratch/packages/gcc/snap/gcc
-snapshot-20070414/build/./gcc/ -B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/i486-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/usr/lib/gcc-snapsho
t/i486-linux-gnu/lib
63 matches
Mail list logo
