--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization
Keywords|
--- Comment #2 from gcc-bugs at wbfb dot de 2007-04-25 22:16 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
What is your gfortran version (gfortran -v)?
I cannot repoduce it with neither -static nor without using
gfortran 4.1.3 20070413 (prerelease)
and 4.3.0 20070425 (experimental)
under x86_64
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-25 22:39 ---
This is PR 31099, fixed on more recent versions of gfortran.
Closing.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 31099 ***
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #20 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-25 22:39
---
*** Bug 31706 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk 2007-04-25 22:46
---
I guess I walk away from you guys at this point. You need to think carefully
about the fortran standard, which does not define any abi whatsoever
(unfortunately). The fortran programmer is not supposed to think
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-25 22:58 ---
Yes the fortran standard does not define the ABI, the target which you are
compiling for does and if you change it in any way (which is what options like
-malign-double does) you are going to run into problems like
Command line: gcc -c lib\rtl\workitem.c -o obj-i386\lib\rtl\workitem.o
-Iobj-i386\lib\rtl -Ilib\rtl -D__USE_W32API -D_NTOSKRNL_ -D__NO_CTYPE_INLINES
-DNO_RTL_INLINES -D_NTSYSTEM_ -D_NTDLLBUILD_ -Iobj-i386\lib\rtl -I. -Iinclude
-Iinclude\psdk -Iinclude\crt -Iinclude\ddk -Iinclude\GL -Iinclude\ndk
--- Comment #1 from hackbunny at reactos dot com 2007-04-25 23:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=13442)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13442action=view)
Preprocessor output
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31707
--- Comment #2 from hackbunny at reactos dot com 2007-04-25 23:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=13443)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13443action=view)
GIMPLE source for the test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31707
--- Comment #3 from hackbunny at reactos dot com 2007-04-25 23:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=13444)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13444action=view)
Final tree dump for the test case
By going through the tree dump, it appears the warning has no reason to be
--
--- Comment #4 from hackbunny at reactos dot com 2007-04-25 23:33 ---
A couple more notes:
* no warning if setjmp is used instead of __builtin_setjmp
* no warning if the call to bar() is removed
* no warning in GCC 4.1.2
--
hackbunny at reactos dot com changed:
What
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
Component|c |middle-end
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-25 23:59 ---
The problem is that the CFG does not know that the first time through the loop
when calling bar, you cannot get to the setjmp. This is a hard problem to
solve really. You have to track the uninitialized variable
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31681
--- Comment #4 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2007-04-26 00:58 ---
The patch mentioned in Comment #2 is also causing problems on IA64 Linux and
HP-UX. If I build a bootstrap compiler and then use the resulting fortran
compiler to compile the SPEC 2006 benchmark 173.applu the resulting
Yesterday (2007-4-25) I downloaded gcc 4.2 and ran into a problem with g++
as illustrated here:
templateclass T
struct xyz {
T x, y, z;
};
templateclass T
struct myclass {
void fun(void);
};
templateclass T
void myclassT::fun(void)
{
--- Comment #6 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-26 01:30 ---
Subject: Bug 31403
Author: kkojima
Date: Thu Apr 26 01:29:54 2007
New Revision: 124171
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=124171
Log:
PR target/31403
* config/sh/sh.md (movsi_ie):
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-26 01:55 ---
Fixed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-04/msg00727.html
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from ian at airs dot com 2007-04-26 02:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=13445)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13445action=view)
Proposed patch
I'm testing this patch on i686-pc-linux-gnu. If somebody can test it on ARM,
that would be great.
--
--- Comment #16 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-26 02:20
---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] possible quadratic behaviour.
On 25 Apr 2007 20:56:24 -, pluto at agmk dot net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Comment #15 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-04-25 21:56
a.c:
struct f { int i; } __attribute__((__packed__));
const char *foo(struct f *);
b.c:
struct f;
const char *foo(struct f *);
c.c (identical to a.c):
struct f { int i; } __attribute__((__packed__));
const char *foo(struct f *);
gcc -fsyntax-only -combine -ffreestanding a.c b.c c.c
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-26 03:29
---
Subject: Bug 31388
Author: mmitchel
Date: Thu Apr 26 03:29:43 2007
New Revision: 124172
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=124172
Log:
PR c++/31388
* cp-tree.h (ARITHMETIC_TYPE):
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-26 03:37
---
Subject: Bug 31338
Author: mmitchel
Date: Thu Apr 26 03:37:20 2007
New Revision: 124173
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=124173
Log:
Fix PR# in ChangeLog:
PR c++/31338
*
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-26 03:37
---
Fixed in 4.3.0.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-04-26 05:54 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Regarding the original problem with CP2k: A dependence on the optimization
options usually indicates a middle-end problem rather than a (Fortran)
front-end problem. As it occurred around the
101 - 125 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
