[Bug middle-end/33423] [4.2/4.3 regression]: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:8670

-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug libfortran/21185] libgfortran unusable for cross-testing for newlib targets

--- Comment #20 from rask at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-15 10:19 --- arm-unknown-elf has 8000+ failures. Some of them are similar to this one (which happen on the other targets as well): /n/12/rask/src/all/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/chmod_1.f90:0: warning: 'const' attribute directive ign

[Bug libfortran/21185] libgfortran unusable for cross-testing for newlib targets

--- Comment #21 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-15 11:12 --- For cris-elf, results look promising: === gfortran Summary === # of expected passes20431 # of unexpected failures231 # of expected failures 6 # of unresolved testcases

[Bug target/33431] [SH4] performance regression between 3.4.6 and 4.x

--- Comment #4 from nbkolchin at gmail dot com 2007-09-15 12:13 --- There are no differences in "cc1 --target-help" output. I will try to split scimark in small pieces and test them separately. Thank you for your help. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33431

[Bug middle-end/33423] [4.2/4.3 regression]: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:8670

--- Comment #3 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-15 14:23 --- It is a simpler testcase: --- static struct { char buf[15]; } u2; void test6 (void) { int len; char *p; for (len = 0; len < 2; len++) { p = __builtin___memset_chk (u2.buf, '\0', len, 15); if (p != u2

[Bug libfortran/21185] libgfortran unusable for cross-testing for newlib targets

--- Comment #22 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-15 14:53 --- Subject: Bug 21185 Author: fxcoudert Date: Sat Sep 15 14:52:46 2007 New Revision: 128512 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128512 Log: PR libfortran/21185 * runtime/compile_o

[Bug middle-end/33423] [4.2/4.3 regression]: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:8670

--- Comment #4 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-15 14:58 --- This one works: --- static char buf[15]; void test6 (void) { int len; char *p; for (len = 0; len < 15; len++) { p = __builtin___memset_chk (&buf[0], '\0', len, 15); if (p != &buf[0]) return; } }

[Bug middle-end/33423] [4.2/4.3 regression]: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:8670

--- Comment #5 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-15 15:00 --- We can fold __builtin___memset_chk (buf, 0, 1, 15); into __builtin_memset (&buf, 0, 1); But we failed to fold __builtin___memset_chk (&u2.buf[0], 0, 1, 15); -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33423

[Bug fortran/33400] Formatted read fails if line ends without line break

--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-15 15:31 --- Confirmed. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/14032] Specialization of inner template using outer template argument doesn't work

--- Comment #22 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-15 15:35 --- *** Bug 10574 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/10574] Partial specialization selection failure involving a default template parameter from inside a template

--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-15 15:35 --- Fixed with the patch for PR 14032. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 14032 *** -- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/33441] New: FAIL: g++.dg/ext/vla4.C (test for errors, line 10)

Executing on host: /mnt/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++ -B/mnt/gnu/gc c/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../ /mnt/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/vla4 .C -nostdinc++ -I/mnt/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include /hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 -I/mnt/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp

[Bug libgcj/33442] New: 1938 unexpected fails in libjava testsuite

See . Here's one: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/gnu/gcc-4.2/objdir/hppa-linux/libjava/testsuite$ gdb virtual GNU gdb 6.5.50.20061105-cvs Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public Lic

[Bug libgcj/33442] 1938 unexpected fails in libjava testsuite

--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-15 16:51 --- Hmmm, I also got a bunch of fails on head in my last build on mx3210: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-09/msg00736.html However, there weren't any fails on gsyprf11: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/20

[Bug libgcj/33442] 1938 unexpected fails in libjava testsuite

--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-15 18:13 --- I have no idea what has triggered this bug but the problem seems to be in the setting of the stack base in GC_get_thread_stack_base(). In particular, pthread_attr_getstack() seems broken. This is the code for the li

[Bug debug/33429] debug info for class2 in g++.dg/other/unused1.C requires -femit-class-debug-always

--- Comment #3 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-15 18:38 --- I'm also seeing this in 4.2.2. -- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/33423] [4.2/4.3 regression]: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:8670

--- Comment #6 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-15 18:50 --- Another simple testcase: --- static char buf; void test6 (void) { int len; void *p; for (len = 0; len < 2; len++) { p = __builtin___memset_chk (&buf, '\0', len, 1); if (p != &buf) return; } } --- f

[Bug bootstrap/33443] New: Compiler warnings in gcc sources

On Linux/x86-64, I got /export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/builtins.c:3334: warning: cast discards qualifiers from pointer target type /export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/builtins.c:3338: warning: cast discards qualifiers from pointer target type /export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/builtins.c:3447: warning: cast discards

[Bug middle-end/33443] Compiler warnings in gcc sources

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-15 19:18 --- These are all expected. and they will never cause a bootstrap failure. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug middle-end/33423] [4.2/4.3 regression]: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:8670

--- Comment #7 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-15 19:24 --- This patch works for the testcase. --- gcc/expr.c.chk 2007-09-07 07:53:42.0 -0700 +++ gcc/expr.c 2007-09-15 12:21:57.0 -0700 @@ -9117,7 +9117,6 @@ expand_expr_real_1 (tree exp, rtx target case BIND_

[Bug middle-end/33423] [4.2/4.3 regression]: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:8670

--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-15 19:30 --- Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 regression]: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:8670 On 15 Sep 2007 19:24:28 -, hjl at lucon dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- Comment #7 from hjl at

[Bug target/33062] ICE in emit_move_insn and expand_call with -fdefault-integer-8

--- Comment #9 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-15 19:31 --- Subject: Bug 33062 Author: danglin Date: Sat Sep 15 19:30:50 2007 New Revision: 128516 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128516 Log: PR target/33062 * pa.c (function_value): Use

[Bug target/33062] ICE in emit_move_insn and expand_call with -fdefault-integer-8

--- Comment #10 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-15 19:44 --- Fixed by change. -- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Stat

[Bug fortran/33444] New: openmp invalid multi-thread runtime result (-ffree-form only!)

fortran code using openmp fails at runtime for multiple threads under -ffree-form (but NOT -ffixed-form). possibly due solely to treatment of continuation characters? (tested only under gcc 4.1.2 (fedora core 7) -- Summary: openmp invalid multi-thread runtime result (-ffree-form

[Bug middle-end/33348] [4.3 Regression] gfortran.dg/g77/19990826-3.f fails at -O1

--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-09-15 19:47 --- I have reduced the test to: C* PCAPOP SUBROUTINE PCAPOP() DIMENSION NVA(6) C ! P1=FLOAT(NB)/FLOAT(M1) 10IP1=P1 IF(IP1.GE.NVA(K)) GOTO 7 IF(IP2.EQ.0) GOTO 3 7 IF(K.EQ.6) GOTO 11

[Bug fortran/33445] New: openmp invalid multi-thread runtime result (-ffree-form only!)

fortran code using openmp fails at runtime for multiple threads under -ffree-form (but NOT -ffixed-form). possibly due solely to treatment of continuation characters? (tested only under gcc 4.1.2 (fedora core 7) $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-redhat-linux Configured with: ../config

[Bug fortran/33445] openmp invalid multi-thread runtime result (-ffree-form only!)

--- Comment #1 from fred2 at qnet dot com 2007-09-15 19:52 --- Created an attachment (id=14209) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14209&action=view) fixed-form source code (runs correctly). see bug description to duplicate error this attachment (and bug description) wa

[Bug target/33406] [4.3 Regression] At revision 128385 Bootstraping PPC Darwin still fail in Java

--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-09-15 19:53 --- I won't comment about the incredible activity on this bug!-( > Lastly, if this is the same bug that is breaking the libgomp build on > powerpc64 > linux, those testresults are now all being posted with libgomp disab

[Bug middle-end/33423] [4.2/4.3 regression]: internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:8670

-- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug middle-end/33348] [4.3 Regression] gfortran.dg/g77/19990826-3.f fails at -O1

--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-09-15 20:28 --- The line SUBROUTINE PCAPOP() is not necessary to get the failure. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33348

[Bug c++/30300] Bogus diagnostic for anonymous structs/classes

--- Comment #3 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-15 20:44 --- The diagnostic was fixed by the patch for PR30302. -- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/33446] New: [4.3 regression] ERROR: gfortran.dg/nint_2.f90 -O0 : syntax error in target selector

seen on i686-linux-gnu 20070915, this testcase fails Matthias ERROR: gfortran.dg/nint_2.f90 -O0 : syntax error in target selector "xfail powerpc-ibm-aix* powerpc*-linux*" for " dg-do 6 run { xfail powerpc-ibm-aix* powerpc*-linux* } " -- Summary: [4

[Bug fortran/33446] [4.3 regression] ERROR: gfortran.dg/nint_2.f90 -O0 : syntax error in target selector

--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-09-15 21:17 --- see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-09/msg00247.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33446

[Bug tree-optimization/33373] [4.3 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_type_demotion, at tree-vect-transform.c:4098

--- Comment #6 from belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru 2007-09-15 21:54 --- Fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&revision=128514 -- belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/31497] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtins-59.c on PA HP-UX

--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-15 22:48 --- Regarding builtins-59.c, I believe it fails because expand_builtin_sincos() returns NULL_RTX if the sincos insn is not available. Possibly, this is a bit pessimistic but it looks like I should xfail the two failing

[Bug tree-optimization/31496] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtins-20.c (test for excess errors)

--- Comment #3 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-15 23:12 --- I believe that this test started failing when mode cases were added in the "Handle CONJ_EXPR in negate_expr_p and fold_negate_expr". Test doesn't fail on linux, so this has something to do with missing C99 functions

[Bug tree-optimization/32572] Small C++ function fails to inline with large negative badness

--- Comment #3 from astrange at ithinksw dot com 2007-09-15 23:47 --- It's more like it was accidentally fixed and the underlying cause is still there, but it is fixed. -- astrange at ithinksw dot com changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/31496] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtins-20.c (test for excess errors)

--- Comment #4 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-16 00:21 --- Sorry, comment #3 is wrong. This change was introduced by the additions to builtins-20.c for the carg(z) -> atan2(z.i, z.r). There we have: +static tree +fold_builtin_carg(tree arglist, tree type) +{ + if (valida

[Bug tree-optimization/31496] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtins-20.c (test for excess errors)

--- Comment #5 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-16 02:03 --- There doesn't seem to be any difference between the definitions for DEF_C99_BUILTIN and DEF_C99_C90RES_BUILTIN. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31496

[Bug libfortran/21185] libgfortran unusable for cross-testing for newlib targets

--- Comment #23 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-16 02:29 --- Created an attachment (id=14210) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14210&action=view) bzip2:ed gfortran.log for cris-elf for r128489 plus access_dup2.diff plus toplevel patch to enable gfortran for cris

[Bug target/11180] [avr-gcc] Optimization decrease performance of struct assignment.

--- Comment #14 from dmixm at marine dot febras dot ru 2007-09-16 03:22 --- It was: (define_insn "movdi" [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "") (match_operand:DI 1 "general_operand" ""))] "" "#") (define_split [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_operan