--- Comment #17 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 05:16 ---
Subject: Bug 33168
Author: aoliva
Date: Thu Jan 3 05:15:42 2008
New Revision: 131276
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131276
Log:
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR target/33168
* decl.c (cp_finish_decl): C
--- Comment #12 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 02:47 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] ICE in int_cst_value, at tree.c:8047 at -O3
The fix I sent earlier had a typo, so I'm testing again.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34458
--- Comment #10 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 02:41 ---
fixed.
--
spop at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #9 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 02:39 ---
Subject: Bug 34635
Author: spop
Date: Thu Jan 3 02:38:24 2008
New Revision: 131275
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131275
Log:
2007-12-19 Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR tree-opt
--- Comment #4 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 02:35 ---
Fixed by patch.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|
--- Comment #3 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 02:34 ---
Subject: Bug 34562
Author: danglin
Date: Thu Jan 3 02:33:12 2008
New Revision: 131274
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131274
Log:
PR middle-end/34562
* g++.dg/other/first-glob
--- Comment #5 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr 2008-01-03 01:51
---
I think component shouldn't be target because it fails on more than one
platform.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32276
--- Comment #26 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-01-03
01:44 ---
Subject: Re: wo_prof_two_strs.c:56: internal
compiler error: in find_new_var_of_type, at ipa-struct-reorg.c:605
With the attached change and Richard's patch from comment #11, I'm down
to the same
--- Comment #6 from galtgendo at o2 dot pl 2008-01-03 01:05 ---
To make earlier comment clear: yes, I agree that it's most probably running out
of memory.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34572
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 00:09 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:56
---
Now also fixed in GCC 4.2.3.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:56
---
Now also fixed in gcc 4.2.3.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:55
---
Now also fixed in gcc 4.2.3.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:54
---
Now also fixed in GCC 4.2.3.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:54
---
Now also fixed in GCC 4.2.3.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:53
---
Subject: Bug 33494
Author: reichelt
Date: Wed Jan 2 23:52:17 2008
New Revision: 131269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131269
Log:
Backport:
2007-10-31 Paolo Carlini <[EMA
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:50
---
Subject: Bug 33495
Author: reichelt
Date: Wed Jan 2 23:49:23 2008
New Revision: 131268
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131268
Log:
Backport:
2007-11-02 Paolo Carlini <[EMA
--- Comment #3 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:48
---
Subject: Bug 33493
Author: reichelt
Date: Wed Jan 2 23:47:08 2008
New Revision: 131267
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131267
Log:
Backport:
2007-09-27 Paolo Carlini <[EMA
--- Comment #9 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:45
---
Subject: Bug 33462
Author: reichelt
Date: Wed Jan 2 23:44:10 2008
New Revision: 131266
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131266
Log:
Backport:
2007-09-18 Paolo Carlini <[EMA
--- Comment #3 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:41
---
Subject: Bug 33463
Author: reichelt
Date: Wed Jan 2 23:40:41 2008
New Revision: 131265
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131265
Log:
Backport:
2007-09-18 Paolo Carlini <[EMA
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:35 ---
Subject: Bug 34608
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 2 23:33:54 2008
New Revision: 131264
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131264
Log:
PR middle-end/34608
* omp-low.c (expand_omp_paral
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #14 from hutchinsonandy at netscape dot net 2008-01-02 23:29
---
Created an attachment (id=14862)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14862&action=view)
Patch to current HEAD
This will patch avr.h and avr.c to allow REG_X as valid BASE_POINTER.
--
http
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33699
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:20
---
This code isn't valid. We probably shouldn't allow declarations of
__builtin_va_start, and we certainly shouldn't allow declarations that don't
match the internal definition -- and I don't think that declaration d
--- Comment #45 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com 2008-01-02 23:17
---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] bad interaction between
DF and SJLJ exceptions
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #44 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:12
> ---
> I've
--- Comment #37 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:17
---
Downgrading to P4. We seem to have consensus that this is now a GCC wrong-code
bug. I can't tell if we think this is an optimization bug or not; if we do
think so, please bump this back to P3, with a test-case s
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:14
---
Put into WAITING state until the information requested in Comment #2 is
available.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #44 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:12
---
I've marked this as P2 because it seems to depend on the less-used SJLJ EH
method, and, as I understand it, in Ada. (The comments above suggest that the
C testcase is not actually so problematic.)
--
mmitchel
--- Comment #11 from peeterj at ca dot ibm dot com 2008-01-02 23:09 ---
I see that this bug fix is targetted for 4.1.3, but also see that such a
release isn't planned:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-05/msg00669.html
should the target release for this bug be updated to 4.2 or 4.3?
--
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:06
---
Alpha is not a primary or secondary platform.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33890
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 23:00
---
Dorit, given your patch, can this be closed out?
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #11 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 22:50
---
adding a comment to test
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 22:59
---
P2, until we know if this is actually wrong code.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 22:50
---
adding a comment to test
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34458
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 22:38 ---
Confirmed. This is a regression vs. 4.2:
$ cat foo.f
! Rejects valid. EQUIVALENCE of substrings; fails with 4.[1-3].x with:
!
!EQUIVALENCE (A (2,1) (1:1), B (1) (2:3), C (3:5))
! 1
!Error: Syntax
--- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-01-02 21:53 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I suggest that the component for this bug be changed from c++ to libstdc++,
> and the title to something like:
>
> "[LWG Issue 767] push_back and push_front need overloads for type T"
Please do
--- Comment #16 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 21:48
---
Regarding comment #14, yep. Patch posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-01/msg00041.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32843
--- Comment #2 from sylvain dot pion at sophia dot inria dot fr 2008-01-02
21:37 ---
In fact, this is not really an issue with variadic templates,
since you get the same problem with:
void* g(int a) { return new (char*)(a); }
int main() {
g(__null);
}
Nevertheless, I ope
--- Comment #5 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 21:02 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] tree check: expected polynomial_chrec, have
integer_cst in add_multivariate_self_dist, at tree-data-ref.c:2813
I'm testing a patch that fixes the problem on i686-linux.
--- Comment
--- Comment #14 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 21:00 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> The patch in comment #12 works as advertised without regression in 32 and 64
> bit modes on ppc/Intel and my favourite platform.
>
Thanks for the test. I have been through several variant
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 20:52 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] tree check: expected polynomial_chrec, have
integer_cst in add_multivariate_self_dist, at tree-data-ref.c:2813
I'm testing a patch that fixes the problem on i686-linux.
--- Comment
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 20:54 ---
Testing a patch.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|u
--- Comment #3 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 20:52 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] tree check: expected polynomial_chrec, have
integer_cst in add_multivariate_self_dist, at tree-data-ref.c:2813
I'm testing a patch that fixes the problem on i686-linux.
--- Comment
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 20:30 ---
BTW, I checked in a fix for this on the incremental-compiler branch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-12/msg00677.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34457
--- Comment #21 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-01-02 20:27 ---
> MATMUL is one distinctly possible one
Paul,
If you are interested, I have a variant of induct.f90 in which I have replaced
three dot-products by the matrix-vector product for a total disaster on all
compilers I ha
--- Comment #20 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 19:30 ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> gfortran does inline most array intrinsics, but only if the result is a
> scalar.
> For most array intrinsics this isn't that much of a problem since usually one
> uses the variant that re
--- Comment #6 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 19:06 ---
Any update?
Current trunk still produces wrong code for weakrefs..
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 18:49 ---
Testing a fix.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unass
--- Comment #7 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-01-02 18:45 ---
Note that the split resize requires DefaultConstructible for the first
overload, and therefore, missing Concepts, the vector class cannot be
explicitely instantiated anymore for non-DefaultConstructible types.
--
http:
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34055
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34055
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34448
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34635
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34635
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34573
--- Comment #17 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 17:29
---
I would expect pt.c to call grok_array_decl (which is the same function called
by the parser), not build_x_binary_op.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
Ada runtime includes unsafe calls to mktemp and tmpname on OpenBSD.
This is identical to PR ada/34553, but for OpenBSD (gcc trunk, r131220).
Patch:
http://iki.fi/tero.koskinen/gcc/gcc-ada-adaint_c.diff
Build log:
/home/tkoskine/programs/gcc-trunk/lib/gcc/i386-unknown-openbsd4.2/4.3.0/adalib/l
ibg
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34457
--- Comment #1 from tero dot koskinen at iki dot fi 2008-01-02 17:13
---
Created an attachment (id=14857)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14857&action=view)
Initialize Ada runtime's floating point support and error handler on OpenBSD
Patch attached if the url in sum
Ada runtime (gcc trunk, r131220) is missing floating point and error handler
initialization on OpenBSD.
Patch avaible at:
http://iki.fi/tero.koskinen/gcc/gcc-ada-init_c.diff
This is originally from Markus Hennecke.
PS. __gnat_error_handler is direct copy of NetBSD equivalent.
--
Su
--- Comment #25 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-01-02 17:07 ---
On Intel Darwin9 the patch from PR34472 has the same effect than the patch in
comment #11, i.e., the behavior reported in comment #22.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34483
--- Comment #1 from tero dot koskinen at iki dot fi 2008-01-02 16:52
---
Created an attachment (id=14856)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14856&action=view)
Fix for Ada.Text_IO.Get_Immediate on OpenBSD
Patch attached, in case the url in the summary does not work.
On OpenBSD with gcc trunk (r131220), following program waits for when
it should return immediately after key press.
-- get_immed.adb
with Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Get_Immed is
Ch : Character;
begin
Ada.Text_IO.Get_Immediate (Ch);
end Get_Immed;
-- end
Patch available at:
http://iki.fi/tero.k
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 16:41 ---
Testing a patch.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|una
--- Comment #1 from tero dot koskinen at iki dot fi 2008-01-02 16:37
---
Created an attachment (id=14855)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14855&action=view)
Fix for OpenBSD/clearenv() issue
Patch attached, in case the url in the summary does not work.
--
http:/
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 16:28 ---
*** Bug 34642 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34641
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 16:29 ---
*** Bug 34643 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Ada runtime of gcc trunk (r131220) build dies because OpenBSD does not have
clearenv() function.
Following patch should fix the issue:
http://iki.fi/tero.koskinen/gcc/gcc-ada-env_c.diff
How to repeat:
$ svn co ... gcc-trunk
$ mkdir obj;cd obj
$ CC="egcc -L/usr/local/lib" LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 16:29 ---
bugzilla is broken
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 34640 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 16:15 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Note that for last night's trunk, I get the following times
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# /irun/bin/gfortran -static pr34568.f90
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# ./a.out
2.1826680
8.2267494
[EMA
gned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: francois dot jacq at irsn dot fr
GCC build triplet: 20080102 (experimental) [trunk revision 131253]
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34643
./cc1plus -fpreprocessed TextIterator.ii -quiet -march=z900 -m64 -O2 -version
-fPIC -o /dev/null -w
GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.3.0 20080102 (experimental) (s390-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.2.2 (SUSE Linux), GMP version 4.2.1, MPFR
version 2.2.1.
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min
./cc1plus -fpreprocessed TextIterator.ii -quiet -march=z900 -m64 -O2 -version
-fPIC -o /dev/null -w
GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.3.0 20080102 (experimental) (s390-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.2.2 (SUSE Linux), GMP version 4.2.1, MPFR
version 2.2.1.
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-01-02 16:01 ---
I think Johannes' analysis is completely right. And, e.g., "STL Tutorial and
Reference Guide", 20.6, or "The C++ Programming Language", 19, evidently also
agrees with that reading of the standard.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
gned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: francois dot jacq at irsn dot fr
GCC build triplet: 20080102 (experimental) [trunk revision 131253]
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 12:37 ---
Subject: Bug 34093
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 2 12:35:38 2008
New Revision: 131257
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131257
Log:
2008-01-02 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 12:37 ---
Subject: Bug 34093
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 2 12:35:38 2008
New Revision: 131257
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131257
Log:
2008-01-02 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 15:22
---
Looking at assembly differences in libjava doesn't reveal something obvious.
It
seems to be neither boolean bitfields nor enums (which would have been the
obvious differences where C and C++ semantics differ). Ma
--- Comment #24 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-01-02
15:11 ---
Subject: Re: wo_prof_two_strs.c:56: internal compiler error: in
find_new_var_of_type, at ipa-struct-reorg.c:605
> Would you please see the comment #4 for PR 34534, and try it on your machine?
The wo_prof
--- Comment #5 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 14:56 ---
Yes. I submitted a patch which fixed all the related problems, and Diego
wanted some refactoring of the code. I am working on it as we speak. Diego
has said that if the patch is too much of a hassle, the current one
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 14:14 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 14:11 ---
On the tree level there is no visible regression, but we have V_MUST_DEFs and
a single SFT on the 4.2 branch while trunk does not create an extra virtual tag
for the single-field union:
:
# a1_12 = VDEF
a1.a =
--- Comment #13 from hutchinsonandy at netscape dot net 2008-01-02 13:36
---
Problem occurs because 1 base pointer is used for function pointer and the
other is used for frame pointer. (There are only 2). Backend
LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS tells reload to use a base pointer for reload pa
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2008-01-02 13:37 ---
This also happens with 4.3.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34150
--- Comment #23 from rsandifo at nildram dot co dot uk 2008-01-02 13:19
---
Subject: Re: wo_prof_two_strs.c:56: internal compiler error: in
find_new_var_of_type, at ipa-struct-reorg.c:605
Olga, is it OK if I submit the patch from comment #11? Or would you prefer
to go with the patch
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 13:05 ---
Ping? Is this still broken?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34465
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 12:57 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 12:53 ---
At least confirmed. Jason, would you have a look here?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 12:37
---
Subject: Bug 31976
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 2 12:35:38 2008
New Revision: 131257
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131257
Log:
2008-01-02 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 12:45 ---
Dominators seem to be broken.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 12:36 ---
Fixed.
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 12:37 ---
Subject: Bug 34093
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 2 12:35:38 2008
New Revision: 131257
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 12:36 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from gerald at pfeifer dot com 2008-01-02 11:52 ---
I just tested DLV against current GCC CVS and where I had been seeing
some 400 out of some 1000 testcases failing a couple of days ago, I am
now down to 10 failures.
This doesn't mean that this very patch fixed it, but
--- Comment #33 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 11:00
---
Unassigning.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|r
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 10:55 ---
Mine, I have a patch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assig
--- Comment #4 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 10:48 ---
Subject: Bug 34013
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Jan 2 10:46:17 2008
New Revision: 131255
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131255
Log:
(ix86_expand_prologue): Save red-zone while stack probing.
PR
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 10:03 ---
*** Bug 34638 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 10:04 ---
*** Bug 34639 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rg
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
