--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bonzini at gnu dot org
|dot org |
--- Comment #5 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-02-20 07:55 ---
actually it is not a dup. but I do have a patch that will solve both.
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #18 from lennox at cs dot columbia dot edu 2008-02-20 05:03
---
This is a regression from 4.2, despite the lack of marking.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34000
--- Comment #26 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-20 04:48 ---
Subject: Bug 34950
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 20 04:47:47 2008
New Revision: 132470
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132470
Log:
PR c++/34950
* pt.c (resolve_overloaded_unificat
--- Comment #25 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-20 04:48 ---
Subject: Bug 34950
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 20 04:47:28 2008
New Revision: 132469
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132469
Log:
PR c++/34950
* pt.c (resolve_overloaded_unificat
--- Comment #22 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-20 04:48 ---
Subject: Bug 34774
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 20 04:47:28 2008
New Revision: 132469
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132469
Log:
PR c++/34950
* pt.c (resolve_overloaded_unificat
--- Comment #24 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-20 04:48 ---
Fixed in all open branches.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-20 02:08 ---
Hmm, &temp refers to the pointer to the array.
What happens if you use temp instead of &temp?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35258
--- Comment #1 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-20 02:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=15185)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15185&action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35258
Someone at IBM working on a very large project on s390 showed me some odd code
in which two memcpy calls get merged into something that instead spreads one
character into the final destination. A modification of that code that looks
more normal is:
char string2[9] = "1234";
void
foo (void)
{
ch
--- Comment #17 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-20 01:10 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Is there any possibility of getting a fix for this into 4.3.0?
No. GCC 4.3 will be released soon and this isn't even marked as a regression
(much less a P1 regression).
--
manu at gcc d
--- Comment #1 from gerald at pfeifer dot com 2008-02-20 00:01 ---
Sorry, I wasn't clear enough here -- this also happens with 4.3.0.
--
gerald at pfeifer dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Building on openSUSE 11.0 Alpha2 (as well as Alpha1) I have been seeing
the following with a plain ./configure --prefix=... (omitting those dozen
fancy options that the distros usually employ).
libtool: compile: /tmp/OBJ-0219-2155/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc
-B/tmp/OBJ-0219-2155/./gcc -nostdinc++
-
This web page:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/parallel_mode.html
Has this text:
Configuration and Tuning
Some algorithm variants can be enabled/disabled/selected at compile-time. See
and See for details.
Which links to this page:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/latest-doxygen/
--- Comment #23 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 22:54 ---
Subject: Bug 34950
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 19 22:53:25 2008
New Revision: 132456
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132456
Log:
PR c++/34950
* pt.c (resolve_overloaded_unificat
--- Comment #22 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 22:53 ---
Subject: Bug 34950
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 19 22:53:07 2008
New Revision: 132455
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132455
Log:
PR c++/34950
* pt.c (resolve_overloaded_unificat
--- Comment #9 from nightstrike at gmail dot com 2008-02-19 22:23 ---
Was this patch ever submitted?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34571
The following reduced testcase from PR 34950 gives an incorrect error after the
crashing bug in that PR is fixed:
-
struct default_policy {};
template
struct policy
{
typedef int precision_type;
};
template struct precision {
typedef Real type;
typedef typename Policy::precision_
--- Comment #21 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 22:13 ---
On second thought, the testcase seems to be well-formed; we should do partial
ordering and determine that the second template is more specialized than the
first.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34
--- Comment #20 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 21:45 ---
Incidentally, the error that 3.3 gave for the testcase in comment #8 seems to
be correct: after we substitute the explicit args into the two function
templates, we are left with one which still has an unbound argument
--- Comment #19 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 21:39 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> it may be better to bump processing_template_decl at a higher level, perhaps
> resolve_overloaded_unification.
This seems to be the approach taken in the partial ordering code, so it seems
--- Comment #18 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 21:21 ---
The problem comes when we deal with templates from non-template code. In this
case, we are substituting some parameters but not all into a function template
declaration, so we end up building up new typename types wi
--- Comment #16 from lennox at cs dot columbia dot edu 2008-02-19 21:01
---
Is there any possibility of getting a fix for this into 4.3.0?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34000
--- Comment #28 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 20:20 ---
unsuspending.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #13 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 20:16 ---
Subject: Bug 35218
Author: rwild
Date: Tue Feb 19 20:15:25 2008
New Revision: 132448
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132448
Log:
PR bootstrap/35218
* Makefile.in (build_file_translate): New.
(g
--- Comment #12 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 19:49 ---
Fixed.
--
rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #11 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 19:47 ---
Subject: Bug 35218
Author: rwild
Date: Tue Feb 19 19:47:12 2008
New Revision: 132445
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132445
Log:
PR bootstrap/35218
* Makefile.in (build_file_translate): New.
(g
--- Comment #10 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 19:39 ---
Subject: Bug 35218
Author: rwild
Date: Tue Feb 19 19:38:52 2008
New Revision: 132444
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132444
Log:
PR bootstrap/35218
* Makefile.in (build_file_translate): New.
(g
--- Comment #3 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 19:33 ---
Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00788.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35162
--- Comment #11 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 19:33 ---
Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00788.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29549
--- Comment #2 from joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 19:13 ---
Still happens today so almost certainly on 4.3 branch as well.
h8300-rtems4.9-gcc (GCC) 4.4.0 20080219 (experimental)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35072
--- Comment #5 from Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de 2008-02-19 18:35
---
*** Bug 35248 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de 2008-02-19 18:35
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 32415 ***
--
Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 18:32 ---
Fixed in trunk. Closing.
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 18:26 ---
Subject: Bug 35030
Author: dfranke
Date: Tue Feb 19 18:26:12 2008
New Revision: 132442
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132442
Log:
2008-02-19 Daniel Franke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fo
On Linux/Intel64,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] stack-7]$ cat y.c
extern void abort (void);
void
sse_test (void)
{
if (7.9E6144dl + 3.0E6144dl
!= 9.9E+6144dl)
abort ();
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] stack-7]$ /usr/gcc-4.3/bin/gcc -O2 -c -std=
--- Comment #17 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 17:50 ---
instantiate_type_decl calls tsubst on
chain >
nonlocal VOID file pr34950.C line 7 col 42
align 1 context
and as TYPE_DECL isn't TEMPLATE_DECL, it doesn't bump processing_template_decl
around the tsu
--- Comment #11 from dean at arctic dot org 2008-02-19 17:42 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] jump to
middle of loop on entry with using old version of an variable
On Mon, 19 Feb 2008, xinliangli at gmail dot com wrote:
> Note that assignment of s0 = s in the loop is mos
--- Comment #7 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 17:11 ---
Subject: Bug 34408
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Feb 19 17:11:12 2008
New Revision: 132440
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132440
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/34408
* see.c (see_def_e
--- Comment #14 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 17:10
---
Subject: Bug 28779
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Feb 19 17:09:42 2008
New Revision: 132439
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132439
Log:
PR middle-end/28779
* tree-inline.c (estim
--- Comment #16 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 16:15 ---
Fixed in GCC 4.4.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 16:14 ---
New version of the Fortran 2008 draft (candiate draft, before was working
draft):
ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/N1701-N1750/N1718.pdf
http://www.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/
Thus things should be settled enough for this patch.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 15:59
---
It seems things are now worse:
$ cat s.f90
real x
x = nearest(huge(1.0),1.0)
end
$ ./bin/gfortran s.f90
next.c:91: assertion failed: !mpfr_set_exp ((x), (exp + 1))
f951: internal compiler error: Aborted
Please s
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last recon
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last recon
--- Comment #15 from nickc at redhat dot com 2008-02-19 15:11 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] gcc -v --help returns no options
for C, C++
Hi Manu,
> Too bad. On the other hand, we can close this, can't we?
Yes I agree.
Cheers
Nick
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c
--- Comment #26 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-02-19 15:00 ---
patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00775.html
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #7 from simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2008-02-19 14:44
---
Sorry, for internals.c and internals.i, read intervals2.c and intervals2.i.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35249
--- Comment #14 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 14:44 ---
> > Didn't this got approved for GCC 4.3?
>
> No. :-(
>
Too bad. On the other hand, we can close this, can't we?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31349
--- Comment #1 from marcus at better dot se 2008-02-19 14:41 ---
$ gij -version
java version "1.5.0"
gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.3.0 20080202 (experimental) [trunk revision 132072]
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35253
The following test program throws an IllegalAccessException with gij,
but works with Sun Java.
~$ gij InvokeAnnotationMethod
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalAccessException
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(libgcj.so.90)
at test.Helper.invoke(Helper.java:11)
at InvokeAnnotati
--- Comment #6 from simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2008-02-19 14:40
---
Created an attachment (id=15184)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15184&action=view)
intervals2.c and output of -v -save-temps
Maybe it was easier than I thought. I took out the function up
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 14:36 ---
Subject: Bug 35186
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Feb 19 14:35:48 2008
New Revision: 132433
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132433
Log:
2008-02-19 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR Ada/35186
--- Comment #13 from nickc at redhat dot com 2008-02-19 14:12 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] gcc -v --help returns no options
for C, C++
Hi Manu,
> Didn't this got approved for GCC 4.3?
No. :-(
> Also:
>
> + description = _("The following options are specific to the j
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 13:41 ---
Fixed on the trunk and 4.3.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 13:36 ---
Subject: Bug 35239
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 19 13:35:11 2008
New Revision: 132431
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132431
Log:
PR target/35239
* config/i386/cpuid.h (__cpuid, _
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 13:35 ---
Subject: Bug 35239
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 19 13:34:29 2008
New Revision: 132430
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132430
Log:
PR target/35239
* config/i386/cpuid.h (__cpuid, _
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 12:36
---
> Once I've found it, what would be useful to you?
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
> Assuming that I am able to debug this function, any pointers as to what Icould
> look for that might explain why it is functi
--- Comment #14 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 12:12 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
It is essential to fix the memory leaks - that after all is the purpose behind
allocatable components. I´ll see if I can understand what is happening.
Cheers
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.o
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 12:09 ---
I have a regtested patch for this but cannot post it until Saturday, when I am
back from vacation.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2008-02-19 12:04
---
OK, before I start hacking, what is it that you need once I have found a
function?
What I can do is try to identify a function or minimal functions that, when
compiled in a file with optimisation, will cause E
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 11:56
---
Subject: Bug 34989
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 19 11:55:29 2008
New Revision: 132429
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132429
Log:
2008-02-19 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 11:56
---
Fixed on the trunk.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to
--- Comment #12 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 11:20 ---
Nick,
Didn't this got approved for GCC 4.3? Notice that you committed the patch
*after* GCC 4.3 branched. Also:
+ description = _("The following options are specific to the just the
language ");
should be:
--- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 10:35 ---
...this is FIXED in GCC 4.3 and trunk ;-)
(thanks to you!)
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #11 from nickc at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 10:35 ---
Subject: Bug 31349
Author: nickc
Date: Tue Feb 19 10:33:41 2008
New Revision: 132427
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132427
Log:
PR other/31349
* opts.c (undocumented_msg): Leav
--- Comment #7 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 10:34 ---
Come on HJL, don't be so pessimistic...
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 10:28
---
It's way down
#1 0x004f94ac in dependent_type_p (type=0x2aea625cd180)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c:15553
#2 0x0043e9fe in make_typename_type (context=0x2aea625cd180,
nam
This testcase produces unoptimal code:
_Complex float af[16], bf[16], cf[16];
_Complex double ad[16], bd[16], cd[16];
void testf(void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
cf[i] = af[i] * bf[i];
}
void testd(void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
cd[i] = ad[i] + bd[i];
}
gcc -O2
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 10:19 ---
Subject: Bug 35028
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 19 10:18:29 2008
New Revision: 132426
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132426
Log:
PR c++/35028
* cp-gimplify.c (cxx_omp_clause_appl
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 10:17 ---
Subject: Bug 34964
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 19 10:16:29 2008
New Revision: 132425
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132425
Log:
PR c++/34964
PR c++/35244
* semantics.c (
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 10:17 ---
Subject: Bug 35244
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 19 10:16:29 2008
New Revision: 132425
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132425
Log:
PR c++/34964
PR c++/35244
* semantics.c (
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 10:15 ---
Subject: Bug 35078
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 19 10:14:57 2008
New Revision: 132424
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132424
Log:
PR c++/35078
* parser.c (cp_parser_omp_for_loop):
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33555
77 matches
Mail list logo
