--
irar at il dot ibm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35642
--- Comment #4 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-07-13 08:44 ---
This is now implemented in mainline.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-13 14:08 ---
This looks like an exact duplicate of PR34850, but for C, in the implementation
in lhd_print_error_function.
Thus, mine.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #11 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-07-13 16:19 ---
I confirm that the problem appears at revision 137631 (137630 works fine).
Using gdb, the hanging depends on the code: for the comment #10 I get the
following backtrace
#0 0x93b424ee in semaphore_wait_signal_trap
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-13 17:29 ---
Subject: Bug 36811
Author: rguenth
Date: Sun Jul 13 17:28:26 2008
New Revision: 137754
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137754
Log:
2008-07-13 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-13 17:29 ---
Subject: Bug 36811
Author: rguenth
Date: Sun Jul 13 17:29:10 2008
New Revision: 137755
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137755
Log:
2008-07-13 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-13 17:41
---
Paolo --
I think the first thing is to figure out what mangling we want for these things
-- and if they should be mangled at all. The C++ ABI doesn't specify a
mangling for these operators, since it doesn't
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-13 17:50 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
Compiling the code bug.cc:
void xxx()
{
unsigned*p=0;
for(unsigned i=0;i4;++i)
{
*p++=0;
}
for(unsigned i=0;i4;++i)
{
*p++=0;
}
}
with the command:
/home/buchmann/devel//eo3s//tc/bin/arm-elf-gcc \
-O2 -Wall \
-c -o bug.o bug.cc
results in:
bug.cc: In function
--- Comment #7 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-13 22:28 ---
Subject: Bug 36440
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Jul 13 22:27:58 2008
New Revision: 137757
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137757
Log:
PR testsuite/36440
* tree-call-cdce.c
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-14 00:12 ---
After tests and consideration, I think we should just adjust the documentation;
the pattern condition, where it checks operands, must not be more restrictive
than the constraints. As no code change is expected in the
--- Comment #7 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-14 00:23 ---
Subject: Bug 35492
Author: hp
Date: Mon Jul 14 00:22:35 2008
New Revision: 137765
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137765
Log:
PR target/35492.
* config/cris/cris.h
--- Comment #8 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-14 00:25 ---
Subject: Bug 35492
Author: hp
Date: Mon Jul 14 00:24:35 2008
New Revision: 137766
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137766
Log:
PR target/35492
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr35492.c: New
--- Comment #9 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-14 00:26 ---
Subject: Bug 35492
Author: hp
Date: Mon Jul 14 00:25:52 2008
New Revision: 137767
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137767
Log:
PR target/35492
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr35492.c: New
--- Comment #10 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-14 00:29 ---
Subject: Bug 35492
Author: hp
Date: Mon Jul 14 00:28:27 2008
New Revision: 137768
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137768
Log:
PR target/35492.
* config/cris/cris.md (*btst): Remove
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-14 00:52
---
Subject: Bug 36725
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 14 00:51:44 2008
New Revision: 137769
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137769
Log:
2008-07-13 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-14 01:03
---
Subject: Bug 36725
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 14 01:02:05 2008
New Revision: 137770
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=137770
Log:
2008-07-14 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-14 01:06
---
Fixed on trunk.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36725
#include stdio.h
int main(){
int k = 0;
printf(%d %d %d %d %d\n\n,k++,k , ++k, k++,++k);
return 0;
}
why?
--
Summary: unknow order to simple print
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
The definition of the function is in c-inpath.c as following.
void
split_quote_chain (void)
{
heads[QUOTE] = heads[BRACKET];
tails[QUOTE] = tails[BRACKET];
heads[BRACKET] = NULL;
tails[BRACKET] = NULL;
/* This is NOT redundant. */
quote_ignores_source_dir = true;
}
The elements in
20 matches
Mail list logo
