[Bug fortran/37498] [4.4 Regression] Incorrect array value returned - 4.3 ABI Broken

2008-09-26 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #19 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 06:16 --- Subject: Bug 37498 Author: jvdelisle Date: Fri Sep 26 06:15:21 2008 New Revision: 140683 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=140683 Log: 2008-09-25 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/37498] [4.4 Regression] Incorrect array value returned - 4.3 ABI Broken

2008-09-26 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #20 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 06:21 --- Subject: Bug 37498 Author: jvdelisle Date: Fri Sep 26 06:19:42 2008 New Revision: 140684 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=140684 Log: 2008-09-25 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug tree-optimization/37574] [4.4 Regression] ICE with the vectorizer and GC

2008-09-26 Thread dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from dorit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 06:29 --- Subject: Bug 37574 Author: dorit Date: Fri Sep 26 06:28:01 2008 New Revision: 140685 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=140685 Log: PR tree-optimization/37574 * tree-vectorizer.c

[Bug middle-end/37372] [graphite] SCoP detection splits bbs / Define SCoPs with single entry and exit edge

2008-09-26 Thread grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 06:59 --- Created an attachment (id=16410) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16410action=view) The next version, no bugs in polyhedron I would like to commit this patch, can you test if it works with SCoP

[Bug target/37216] [cygming] Invalid alignment for SSE store to .comm data generated with -O3

2008-09-26 Thread simon dot sasburg at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11 from simon dot sasburg at gmail dot com 2008-09-26 07:32 --- I tried the attached patch, but gcc failed to build for me on cygwin with it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37216

[Bug target/34497] failures on i686-apple-darwin9 in sse4 testcases

2008-09-26 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-09-26 07:34 --- With Xcode 3.1.1 all the failures disappeared but gcc.target/i386/sse4_2-popcntl.c: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse4_2-popcntl.c (test for excess errors) WARNING: gcc.target/i386/sse4_2-popcntl.c compilation failed to

[Bug target/34497] failures on i686-apple-darwin9 in sse4 testcases

2008-09-26 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #10 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-09-26 08:00 --- Comment #9 was for -m32, with -m64 the failures are FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse4_2-popcntl.c (test for excess errors) WARNING: gcc.target/i386/sse4_2-popcntl.c compilation failed to produce executable FAIL:

[Bug ada/5911] Support for multilib in Ada

2008-09-26 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #28 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 08:34 --- Subject: Bug 5911 Author: ebotcazou Date: Fri Sep 26 08:33:04 2008 New Revision: 140687 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=140687 Log: PR ada/5911 * gcc-interface/Makefile.in

[Bug ada/36575] [4.3/4.4 Regression] ACATS c460011 fails at -O3

2008-09-26 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 08:43 --- Reproducible on x86. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/36575] [4.3/4.4 Regression] ACATS c460011 fails at -O3

2008-09-26 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 08:43 --- Investigating. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/36575] [4.3/4.4 Regression] ACATS c460011 fails at -O3

2008-09-26 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 09:24 --- I would bet this is VRP triggered by more inlining. It's constant-folding triggered by more inlining, this already fails at -O0: procedure P is type Unsigned_Over_8 is mod 2**8+2; type Signed_Over_8 is

[Bug fortran/37577] Change internal array descriptor format for better syntax, C interop TR, rank 15

2008-09-26 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 11:38 --- See also: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/ArrayDescriptorUpdate -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37577

[Bug target/34497] failures on i686-apple-darwin9 in sse4 testcases

2008-09-26 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #11 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-09-26 14:00 --- Dominique, The remaining failure in the sse4_2-popcntl.c testcase has been reported for awhile on radar (ID 5650346). Like the previous errors these are most likely assembler bugs. --

[Bug target/34497] failures on i686-apple-darwin9 in sse4 testcases

2008-09-26 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #12 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-09-26 14:19 --- The remaining failure in the sse4_2-popcntl.c testcase has been reported for awhile on radar (ID 5650346). Like the previous errors these are most likely assembler bugs. Jack, Did you get any feedback from

[Bug target/34497] failures on i686-apple-darwin9 in sse4 testcases

2008-09-26 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #13 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-09-26 14:38 --- No, I never got a message that any of the originally reported sse4 gcc test cases were fixed. I simply noticed it during testing. The radar report is still open though. Feel free to open a duplicate to

[Bug fortran/37504] Wrongly rejects: unprotected_pointer = protected_pointer

2008-09-26 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 15:19 --- Subject: Bug 37504 Author: burnus Date: Fri Sep 26 15:17:25 2008 New Revision: 140695 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=140695 Log: 2008-09-26 Tobias Burnus [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/37504] Wrongly rejects: unprotected_pointer = protected_pointer

2008-09-26 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 15:21 --- FIXED on the trunk (4.4) and on the 4.3 branch. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/37580] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Accepts pointer(:) = target without lower bound

2008-09-26 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 15:23 --- Subject: Bug 37580 Author: burnus Date: Fri Sep 26 15:22:13 2008 New Revision: 140696 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=140696 Log: 2008-09-26 Tobias Burnus [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug middle-end/37567] tree SSA to normal checking takes abnormally long time

2008-09-26 Thread lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
--- Comment #11 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2008-09-26 15:33 --- This problem is fixed by my reckoning, so I'm taking the liberty of closing the bug report. -- lucier at math dot purdue dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/37654] New: gcc-4.3.1: stripping trailing backspace from args fools gcc

2008-09-26 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
$ gcc -g3\ -O0 mozilla/view/src/nsScrollPortView.cpp cc1plus: error: unrecognised debug output level 3 -O0 $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.3.1-r1/work/gcc-4.3.1/configure --prefix=/usr

[Bug other/37654] gcc-4.3.1: stripping trailing backspace from args fools gcc

2008-09-26 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
--- Comment #1 from mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz 2008-09-26 15:41 --- Happens also with 4.2.1 but not with 3.3.6. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37654

[Bug tree-optimization/26854] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Inordinate compile times on large routines

2008-09-26 Thread lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
--- Comment #76 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2008-09-26 15:43 --- Created an attachment (id=16411) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16411action=view) memory and cpu time statistics for 2008-09-19 There has been a 13% compile-time regression on this PR since

[Bug tree-optimization/26854] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Inordinate compile times on large routines

2008-09-26 Thread lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
--- Comment #77 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2008-09-26 15:44 --- Created an attachment (id=16412) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16412action=view) memory and cpu statistics for 9/25 Here is a timing report from today. --

[Bug middle-end/37165] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/matrix/matrix-1.c scan-ipa-dump-times matrix-reorg Flattened 3 dimensions 1

2008-09-26 Thread eric dot weddington at atmel dot com
--- Comment #9 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-09-26 15:44 --- Reconfirm test still fails with revision 140691. -- eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/26854] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Inordinate compile times on large routines

2008-09-26 Thread lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
--- Comment #78 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2008-09-26 15:45 --- Created an attachment (id=16413) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16413action=view) Memory and cpu statistics from 9/16 Sorry, I included the wrong file; this should be the correct one from

[Bug libgcj/18266] GCJ: Using references drops finalizers causing all apps to eventually crash ( SIGSEGV in GC_register_finalizer_inner () )

2008-09-26 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #20 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 15:58 --- 1) Create an object. 2) Enter a synchronized block on the object and do Object.wait(). 3) In a second thread, enter a synchronized block on the object. There is lock contention, heavy lock escalation is

[Bug fortran/37580] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Accepts pointer(:) = target without lower bound

2008-09-26 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 16:07 --- FIXED on the trunk (4.4) and on the 4.3 branch. Thanks for the bug report! -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/37576] [4.4 Regression] -v --help ICEs

2008-09-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 16:47 --- Subject: Bug 37576 Author: jakub Date: Fri Sep 26 16:45:44 2008 New Revision: 140709 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=140709 Log: PR middle-end/37576 * opts.c

[Bug other/37654] gcc-4.3.1: stripping trailing backspace from args fools gcc

2008-09-26 Thread brian at dessent dot net
--- Comment #2 from brian at dessent dot net 2008-09-26 17:18 --- Subject: Re: New: gcc-4.3.1: stripping trailing backspace from args fools gcc What exact problem are you trying to report here? Quoting a space with \ to the shell causes it to not split the arguments into two

[Bug other/37654] gcc-4.3.1: stripping trailing backspace from args fools gcc

2008-09-26 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
--- Comment #3 from mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz 2008-09-26 17:24 --- I would actually think that the backslash should be removed by the shell but it is obviously not what happens. I believe your explanation is correct and gcc-3.3.6 did not have the check. However, it

[Bug other/37654] gcc-4.3.1: stripping trailing backspace from args fools gcc

2008-09-26 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Comment #4 from schwab at suse dot de 2008-09-26 19:27 --- Not a gcc bug. -- schwab at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgcj/37636] [4.4 regression] java tools are unable to find resource files

2008-09-26 Thread gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org
--- Comment #4 from gnu_andrew at member dot fsf dot org 2008-09-26 19:32 --- I doubt it. I don't see libintl being linked against either gcj, gij or gjar here, and the fault is in Java code (although locale related). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37636

[Bug debug/35463] typedef missing in debug information with -gdwarf-2 for c++

2008-09-26 Thread hiroto dot shibuya at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hiroto dot shibuya at gmail dot com 2008-09-26 20:48 --- I verified this to be the case since 4.1.0. The last version this was working was 4.0.4. Also this is specific to anonymous struct. If the struct is named, it works fine. This is sever issue for us when

[Bug middle-end/37275] [4.4 Regression] ICE when compile libgomp/task.c

2008-09-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 21:00 --- Subject: Bug 37275 Author: jakub Date: Fri Sep 26 20:59:03 2008 New Revision: 140712 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=140712 Log: PR middle-end/37275 * dwarf2out.c

[Bug middle-end/37576] [4.4 Regression] -v --help ICEs

2008-09-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 21:01 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/37275] [4.4 Regression] ICE when compile libgomp/task.c

2008-09-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 21:03 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/37448] [4.3 Regression] gcc 4.3.1 cannot compile big function

2008-09-26 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #20 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 21:12 --- The testcase now compiles at -O2 in resonable time. Checking enabled compiler: CFG verifier : 15.02 ( 5%) usr 0.01 ( 0%) sys 15.13 ( 5%) wall 0 kB ( 0%) ggc df reaching defs : 7.57 (

[Bug libstdc++/25191] exception_defines.h #defines try/catch

2008-09-26 Thread jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment #60 from jason at redhat dot com 2008-09-26 21:57 --- Subject: Re: exception_defines.h #defines try/catch l dot lunak at suse dot cz wrote: But only in your perfect world. This bug and its silent discarding of exception handling code (and an unintended -fno-exception

[Bug middle-end/37448] [4.3 Regression] gcc 4.3.1 cannot compile big function

2008-09-26 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #21 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 22:15 --- I've just tested Kenny's df scan ref union patch. We still have over 2.2GB footprint that is not that much different from unpatched compiler. allocpool statistics now give some more useful data: df_scan_ref base

[Bug c++/37556] [4.4 regression] ICE with invalid typedef

2008-09-26 Thread simartin at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #2 from simartin at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-09-26 22:53 --- Introduced by: Author: jason Date: Wed Aug 6 02:25:20 2008 New Revision: 138756 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=138756 -- simartin at users dot sourceforge

[Bug target/19566] x86_64 - inconsistent choice of parameter passing method for 16 byte struct

2008-09-26 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 22:56 --- Hi, so to be sure I didn't mess up anything. The following is testcase I use: typedef struct shared_ptr_struct { unsigned long phase:48; unsigned int thread:16; void *addr; } shared_ptr_t; int y;

[Bug target/19566] x86_64 - inconsistent choice of parameter passing method for 16 byte struct

2008-09-26 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-26 23:18 --- It has been fixed in gcc 4.1.2. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/37448] [4.3 Regression] gcc 4.3.1 cannot compile big function

2008-09-26 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #22 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-26 23:34 --- With Kenny's updated df patch and updated statistics I now get: Alloc-pool Kind Pools Elt size Allocated (elts) Peak (elts) Leak (elts)

[Bug bootstrap/37655] New: Error Building libgcc_s.dll

2008-09-26 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
$ uname -a CYGWIN_NT-5.1 MCKELVEY-XP 1.5.25(0.156/4/2) 2008-06-12 19:34 i686 Cygwin $ g++ -v Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-cygwin Configured with: /cygdrive/f/Home/cvsroot/gcc/configure --verbose --enable-threads --disable-nls --disable-win32-registry --enable-languages=c,c++ Thread

[Bug bootstrap/37655] Error Building libgcc_s.dll

2008-09-26 Thread brian at dessent dot net
--- Comment #1 from brian at dessent dot net 2008-09-27 00:14 --- Subject: Re: New: Error Building libgcc_s.dll The fact that the symlink already exists implies that the command failed before and this is the result of running it again. What is the actual error when you remove the

[Bug target/19566] x86_64 - inconsistent choice of parameter passing method for 16 byte struct

2008-09-26 Thread gary at intrepid dot com
--- Comment #9 from gary at intrepid dot com 2008-09-27 00:18 --- (In reply to comment #8) It has been fixed in gcc 4.1.2. FWIW, I just tried this on a gcc 4.0.1 that we have on hand here, and it also appeared to be fixed in that version. --

[Bug c++/37656] New: template specialization of static member constants causes multiple definition error

2008-09-26 Thread rdelashmit at gmail dot com
A specialization of a static member included from multiple cpp files generates multiple definition errors. Example follows, requires 3 files (header and 2 .cpp files which include it). Tested on linux with gcc 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7) and osx with gcc 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5465). Compile

[Bug c++/37656] template specialization of static member constants causes multiple definition error

2008-09-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-27 02:47 --- IIRC this is not a specialization but rather an instantation. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37656

[Bug c++/37657] New: static template member definition fails when parameter is another template

2008-09-26 Thread robertohjdasilva at hotmail dot com
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #14132 +++ Hello, I would like to start from the final solution presented for Bug # 14132 copied below for reference: So when the old code looks like: | | int Avoid::a; | | it must be replaced by: | | template class Avoid; |

[Bug bootstrap/37655] Error Building libgcc_s.dll

2008-09-26 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #2 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2008-09-27 05:26 --- (In reply to comment #1) Subject: Re: New: Error Building libgcc_s.dll The fact that the symlink already exists implies that the command failed before and this is the result of running it again. What is the