[Bug fortran/38268] gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris

2008-11-26 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 08:05 --- There is no error on link stage, but gfortran tries to link program with 32 bits libraries, not with 64 bits one even I force -m64. Not quite. The binary is correctly linked against 64-bit libraries, but the

[Bug fortran/38268] gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris

2008-11-26 Thread mt1 at systella dot fr
--- Comment #5 from mt1 at systella dot fr 2008-11-26 08:27 --- (In reply to comment #4) There is no error on link stage, but gfortran tries to link program with 32 bits libraries, not with 64 bits one even I force -m64. Not quite. The binary is correctly linked against 64-bit

[Bug fortran/38273] New: Cray pointers: Document that

2008-11-26 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/msg/b535884fdbd62f39 Intel has: in the manual A pointer cannot be a function return value. As gfortran also rejects it, Error: CRAY POINTER attribute conflicts with FUNCTION attribute at (1) one could also add it to the manual, or to say it

[Bug c/38274] New: why the option -fstack-protector-all doesn't works?

2008-11-26 Thread zuogang at huawei dot com
source file: #include stdio.h int main(void) { char a = 1; int b = 2; short c = 3; char sztmp[22] = hello worlds!; *(int *)a=0x; sztmp[22]=0; printf(%s,a:%d,b%d\n,sztmp,a,b); return 0; } invoke gcc by :gcc

[Bug c++/38233] [4.4 Regression] 'map' value type + new uninitted const member warnings causes error

2008-11-26 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-11-26 09:39 --- The below is a pure C++ testcase, which EDG accepts and mainline rejects. Jason can you look a bit into it? Thanks in advance! templateclass _T1, class _T2 struct pair { _T1 first;

[Bug middle-end/38271] [4.4 Regression] Spurious / missing ... used uninitialized in this function warning

2008-11-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 10:00 --- Doesn't happen on 64bit x86_64. Testcase which doesn't warn with 4.3: struct xxx { short a; short b; void *c; }; void bar(struct xxx); void foo(struct xxx *p, int i) { struct xxx s = *p; if (s.a)

[Bug fortran/38268] gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris

2008-11-26 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 11:40 --- Is there any issue to direclty fix this mistake in gfortran sources ? This is not a mistake and this is not specific to fortran: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ~ $ gcc -o t t.c -m64 -shared-libgcc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ~ $

[Bug target/34497] failures on i686-apple-darwin9 in sse4 testcases

2008-11-26 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #14 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-26 12:41 --- Fully resolved with... r142121 | uros | 2008-11-22 09:16:57 -0500 (Sat, 22 Nov 2008) | 18 lines PR target/38222

[Bug testsuite/28837] need to prune can't find atom for N_GSYM stabs warnings on Darwin for -m64

2008-11-26 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-26 12:46 --- This issue won't be fixed in the Xcode available for darwin8. It is resolved in Xcode for darwin9. -- howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu changed: What|Removed

[Bug c++/38276] New: [c++0x] ICE on templates, simple test-case

2008-11-26 Thread dragan at plusplus dot co dot yu
This might be related to #35828, but I don't have time to check their sample code. But don't flame me, I have already spent some productive time and managed to strip 2000+ lines of code into only 13. g++ -std=c++0x bug.cc GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.4.0 20081124 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)

[Bug c++/38276] [c++0x] ICE on templates, simple test-case

2008-11-26 Thread dragan at plusplus dot co dot yu
--- Comment #1 from dragan at plusplus dot co dot yu 2008-11-26 13:42 --- Created an attachment (id=16776) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16776action=view) test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38276

[Bug fortran/38205] Tranformational function SUM rejected in initialization expressions

2008-11-26 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 13:50 --- I think that patch is not enough (though useful!). I think one needs to add a gfc_simplify_sum to simplify.c and replace then the NULL by the function name in intrinsic.c for sum. Possibly as well for the other

[Bug fortran/38205] Tranformational function SUM rejected in initialization expressions

2008-11-26 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 12:13 --- confirmed -- mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: [Bug tree-optimization/38180] CCP does not propagate through constant initializers

2008-11-26 Thread Graham Stott
Richard, const volatile is a perfectly valid combination. What is says is it's read only but may change value in ways unknown to the compiler think of a memory mapped hardware register which is read only such as some kind of counter . Cheers Graham

[Bug fortran/38205] Tranformational function SUM rejected in initialization expressions

2008-11-26 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 12:13 --- Created an attachment (id=16775) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16775action=view) untested fix This is probably the way to go. A warning should be added in some cases (didn't think much about

[Bug tree-optimization/38180] CCP does not propagate through constant initializers

2008-11-26 Thread graham dot stott at btinternet dot com
--- Comment #6 from graham dot stott at btinternet dot com 2008-11-26 14:02 --- Subject: Re: CCP does not propagate through constant initializers Richard, const volatile is a perfectly valid combination. What is says is it's read only but may change value in ways unknown to the

[Bug tree-optimization/38180] CCP does not propagate through constant initializers

2008-11-26 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-11-26 13:05 --- Subject: Re: CCP does not propagate through constant initializers On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, graham dot stott at btinternet dot com wrote: --- Comment #4 from graham dot stott at btinternet dot com 2008-11-26

[Bug driver/29075] g++.dg/rtti/repo1.C fails to link on Darwin PPC at -m64

2008-11-26 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #14 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-26 14:08 --- This issue appears to be resolved in Xcode 3.1.1 for powerpc-apple-darwin9. It is unlikely the cctools for powerpc-apple-darwin8 will ever be fixed for this problem. -- howarth at nitro dot med dot uc

[Bug tree-optimization/38275] bootstrap failure when -ftree-parallelize-loops=4 is enabled

2008-11-26 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-11-26 09:48 --- Is this related to middle-end/36902? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38275

[Bug target/29076] g++.dg/eh/forced1.C when compiled at -m64 on Darwin PPC has bus error

2008-11-26 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-26 14:17 --- Both g++.dg/eh/forced1.C and g++.old-deja/g++.eh/terminate2.C now pass fine with -m64 on powerpc-apple-darwin9 using Xcode 3.1.1. This issue is unlikely to be ever fixed in cctools for

[Bug tree-optimization/38180] CCP does not propagate through constant initializers

2008-11-26 Thread graham dot stott at btinternet dot com
--- Comment #4 from graham dot stott at btinternet dot com 2008-11-26 13:03 --- Subject: Re: CCP does not propagate through constant initializers Hi Richard, Does this patch work for objects which are both const and volatile get_symbol_constant_value only looks at TREE_READONLY

[Bug tree-optimization/37869] PTA results wrong for non-pointer variables

2008-11-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 09:47 --- Subject: Bug 37869 Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 26 09:46:23 2008 New Revision: 142213 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142213 Log: 2008-11-25 Daniel Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Richard

Re: [Bug tree-optimization/38180] CCP does not propagate through constant initializers

2008-11-26 Thread Graham Stott
Hi Richard, Does this patch work for objects which are both const and volatile get_symbol_constant_value only looks at TREE_READONLY should it not also look at TREE_VOLATILE ? I don't have a upto date tree to hand to try the following testcase on static const volatile int value = 42; int

[Bug testsuite/38241] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/const2.C fails on *-apple-darwin9

2008-11-26 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-26 12:43 --- Fixed with r142164. -- howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/29031] gcc.dg/asm-b.c execution test aborts at -m64 on powerpc-apple-darwin8

2008-11-26 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-26 14:22 --- This test is now passing fine with current gcc trunk on powerpc-apple-darwin9. -- howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/29032] gcc.dg/cleanup-10.c execution test times out on powerpc-apple-darwin8 at -m64

2008-11-26 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #8 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-26 14:24 --- This test is now passing fine with current gcc under powerpc-apple-darwin9 using Xcode 3.1.1. -- howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/29293] Darwin PPC float to TI integer conversion bug

2008-11-26 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-26 14:30 --- This issue is resolved in current gcc trunk on powerpc-apple-darwin9 using Xcode 3.1.1. -- howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug testsuite/34543] gcc.dg/out-of-bounds-1.c fails on -mstrict-align for powerpc-apple-darwin

2008-11-26 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-26 14:33 --- This test is no longer uses -mstrict-align on powerpc-apple-darwin* so this issue is resolved. -- howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu changed: What|Removed

[Bug testsuite/34569] undefined symbols in builtin-math-4.exe on powerpc-apple-darwin8

2008-11-26 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #1 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-26 14:38 --- This issue no longer exists in current gcc trunk for either powerpc-apple-darwin8 or powerpc-apple-darwin9. -- howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu changed: What|Removed

[Bug c++/34588] g++.dg/other/spu2vmx-1.C doesn't find spu2vmx.h on powerpc-*-darwin*

2008-11-26 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #3 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-26 14:43 --- This test is no longer run on powerpc-apple-darwin*. -- howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/38277] New: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010910-1.c wrong code generation by loop distribution enabled

2008-11-26 Thread tomby at gcc dot gnu dot org
--disable-multilib --enable-languages=c,c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.4.0 20081126 (experimental) (GCC) -- Summary: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010910-1.c wrong code generation by loop distribution enabled Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0

[Bug java/35217] TestClosureGC.jar execution - gij test regression on i686-apple-darwin9

2008-11-26 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #2 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-26 14:45 --- This test failure no longer appears in current gcc trunk on i686-apple-darwin9 using Xcode 3.1.1. -- howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu changed: What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/37843] [4.4 Regression] unaligned stack in main due to tail call optimization

2008-11-26 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 14:53 --- Subject: Bug 37843 Author: hjl Date: Wed Nov 26 14:52:12 2008 New Revision: 14 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=14 Log: 2008-11-26 H.J. Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR middle-end/37843

[Bug tree-optimization/38275] New: bootstrap failure when -ftree-parallelize-loops=4 is enabled

2008-11-26 Thread razya at gcc dot gnu dot org
When enabling -ftree-parallelize-loops=4 , bootstrap fails: cc1: warnings being treated as errors ../../gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c: In function âdwarf2out_frame_debugâ: ../../gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:2393: error: array subscript is above array bounds ../../gcc/gcc/dwarf2out.c:2394: error: array subscript is

[Bug tree-optimization/37869] PTA results wrong for non-pointer variables

2008-11-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 09:47 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/38180] CCP does not propagate through constant initializers

2008-11-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 12:28 --- Subject: Bug 38180 Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 26 12:27:33 2008 New Revision: 142217 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142217 Log: 2008-11-26 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug target/38227] gcc fails to correctly pass arguments with ms_abi function pointers

2008-11-26 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 10:28 --- Fix on trunk at revision 142215. -- ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/38275] bootstrap failure when -ftree-parallelize-loops=4 is enabled

2008-11-26 Thread razya at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from razya at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 10:17 --- (In reply to comment #1) Is this related to middle-end/36902? (In reply to comment #1) Is this related to middle-end/36902? Actually, it looks like a very close problem. But in this case, perhaps we can prevent

[Bug tree-optimization/38180] CCP does not propagate through constant initializers

2008-11-26 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-11-26 15:13 --- Subject: Re: CCP does not propagate through constant initializers On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, graham dot stott at btinternet dot com wrote: --- Comment #6 from graham dot stott at btinternet dot com 2008-11-26 14:02

[Bug middle-end/37843] [4.4 Regression] unaligned stack in main due to tail call optimization

2008-11-26 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #13 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-26 12:23 --- Why do we have... /* { dg-do compile { target { *-*-linux* ilp32 } } } */ in gcc.target/i386/align-main-3.c and gcc.target/i386/pr37843-3.c but not gcc.target/i386/pr37843-1.c and

[Bug regression/38278] New: C++ namespace collision

2008-11-26 Thread holger dot hopp at sap dot com
I've got following namespace collision with gcc trunk rev. 142220. It works for gcc = 4.3 and trunk rev. = 142038. $ gcc-4.4 -c tst.c tst.c:8: error: declaration of 'static __number _Numeric_limits_base__number::min()' tst.c:2: error: changes meaning of 'min' from 'const _Tp min(const _Tp, const

[Bug target/34025] Warning when compiling with -m64 -ffast-math on Intel Darwin

2008-11-26 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #18 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-11-26 15:34 --- This pr has been fixed by revision 130998. -- dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/30518] error from system header file

2008-11-26 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #12 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-11-26 15:39 --- Fixed on Darwin 8 and 9. Closing. -- dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgomp/38270] libgomp test failures due to missing memory barrier

2008-11-26 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-11-26 15:46 --- This may be related to PR 37938. You may try similar fix for Linux/ia64. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38270

[Bug c/38279] New: Float point exception while compiling firefox using profile guided optimization

2008-11-26 Thread rgfbr at yahoo dot com dot br
I was trying to compile firefox 3.0.4 from sources using profile guided optimization when I receive a float point exception from gcc. It was after running the firefox to generate the profile data. This is info that the reporting bugs suggests: * the exact version of GCC gcc (GCC) 4.0.3 * the

[Bug c/38279] Float point exception while compiling firefox using profile guided optimization

2008-11-26 Thread rgfbr at yahoo dot com dot br
--- Comment #1 from rgfbr at yahoo dot com dot br 2008-11-26 15:56 --- Created an attachment (id=16777) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16777action=view) preprocessed file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38279

[Bug c/38279] Float point exception while compiling firefox using profile guided optimization

2008-11-26 Thread rgfbr at yahoo dot com dot br
--- Comment #2 from rgfbr at yahoo dot com dot br 2008-11-26 15:57 --- Created an attachment (id=16778) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16778action=view) gcda file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38279

[Bug c/38279] Float point exception while compiling firefox using profile guided optimization

2008-11-26 Thread rgfbr at yahoo dot com dot br
--- Comment #3 from rgfbr at yahoo dot com dot br 2008-11-26 15:58 --- Created an attachment (id=16779) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16779action=view) gcno file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38279

[Bug c/38279] Float point exception while compiling firefox using profile guided optimization

2008-11-26 Thread rgfbr at yahoo dot com dot br
--- Comment #4 from rgfbr at yahoo dot com dot br 2008-11-26 16:06 --- I know my gcc is very old. I will try to compile the newest version and send the results. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38279

[Bug c/38279] Float point exception while compiling firefox using profile guided optimization

2008-11-26 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-11-26 16:12 --- (In reply to comment #4) I know my gcc is very old. I will try to compile the newest version and send the results. Ok. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed

[Bug c/38279] Float point exception while compiling firefox using profile guided optimization

2008-11-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 16:25 --- This is most likely a divide by zero (x86 causes a FP exception for this for some stupid reason). This is either PR 30650, or another PR about the same thing. --

[Bug c/38279] Float point exception while compiling firefox using profile guided optimization

2008-11-26 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-11-26 16:11 --- Are you aware of the fact that GCC 4.0.x is no longer maintained? You should try again with a current compiler, in the current 4.3.x release series or at least 4.2.x. --

[Bug fortran/38205] Tranformational function SUM rejected in initialization expressions

2008-11-26 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 16:52 --- I think that patch is not enough (though useful!). I think one needs to add a gfc_simplify_sum to simplify.c One probably needs an auxiliary function which iterates through an array either along a dim= (- return a

[Bug c++/38278] [4.4 Regression] C++ namespace collision

2008-11-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 17:08 --- This is perfectly valid code. It works when you omit the parens around min - smells related to a recent fix that I don't remember ... -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug fortran/38252] [4.4 Regression] Empty function with CONTAINS triggers Internal Error

2008-11-26 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 17:22 --- (In reply to comment #2) I am on my travels right now and only have 4.4.0 20080624 on my laptop. The testcase works fine with that, so this regression has crept in since then. Cheers Paul --

[Bug libgomp/38270] libgomp test failures due to missing memory barrier

2008-11-26 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 17:39 --- This is the same problem as in PR37938, as H.J. said, but for powerpc*-linux. I'll try copying the ia64 solution. I see that my objections to having a separate libgomp mutex.h for powerpc have already been raised by

Re: [Bug middle-end/37951] -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 fails for MA57

2008-11-26 Thread Sebastian Pop
gfortran -O3 -fdump-tree-vect-details -ftree-vectorize -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 -c ma57.f ma57.f: In function 'ma57sd': ma57.f:1538: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault [...] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xb7ce06f9 in free () from

[Bug middle-end/37951] -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 fails for MA57

2008-11-26 Thread sebpop at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from sebpop at gmail dot com 2008-11-26 17:42 --- Subject: Re: -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 fails for MA57 gfortran -O3 -fdump-tree-vect-details -ftree-vectorize -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 -c ma57.f ma57.f: In function 'ma57sd': ma57.f:1538: internal compiler error:

[Bug fortran/38205] Tranformational function SUM rejected in initialization expressions

2008-11-26 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 17:49 --- (In reply to comment #5) Currently not simplified are: - ALL/ANY/COUNT - cshift/eoshift - dot_product/matmul - (max|min)(loc|val) - note: (max|min)val is implemented for rank == 1 w/o dim - pack/unpack -

[Bug fortran/38252] [4.4 Regression] Empty function with CONTAINS triggers Internal Error

2008-11-26 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 18:02 --- (In reply to comment #3) (In reply to comment #2) I am on my travels right now and only have 4.4.0 20080624 on my laptop. The testcase works fine with that, so this regression has crept in since then. ...or it

Re: [Bug bootstrap/38262] [4.4 regression] GCC components unnecessarily link with shared gmp/mpfr

2008-11-26 Thread Sebastian Pop
Thanks for catching the missing parts. Here is the updated patch. Does this patch look correct? I sent this patch to test on the gccfarm and will send an email to gcc-patches after it completes regstrap. Thanks, Sebastian On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:08 PM, ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL

[Bug bootstrap/38262] [4.4 regression] GCC components unnecessarily link with shared gmp/mpfr

2008-11-26 Thread sebpop at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from sebpop at gmail dot com 2008-11-26 18:20 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 regression] GCC components unnecessarily link with shared gmp/mpfr Thanks for catching the missing parts. Here is the updated patch. Does this patch look correct? I sent this patch to test on the

[Bug testsuite/28870] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] configuring, over-riding timeout values in testsuite

2008-11-26 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #26 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 18:52 --- Subject: Bug 28870 Author: janis Date: Wed Nov 26 18:51:07 2008 New Revision: 142225 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142225 Log: gcc/ PR testsuite/28870 * doc/sourcebuild.texi

[Bug rtl-optimization/38280] New: [4.3 Regression] Revision 142207 breaks 416.gamess/481.wrf/ in SPEC CPU 2006

2008-11-26 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
On Linux/ia32, revision 142207 caused: gfortran -m32 -c -o mctwo.fppized.o-O2 -mfpmath=sse -mssse3 -ffixed-form mctwo.fppized.f bad allocation for 2046 and 3100 mctwo.fppized.f: In function 'lh2ddi': mctwo.fppized.f:3996: internal compiler error: in check_allocation, at

[Bug bootstrap/38262] [4.4 regression] GCC components unnecessarily link with shared gmp/mpfr

2008-11-26 Thread ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 19:11 --- (In reply to comment #3) Subject: Re: [4.4 regression] GCC components unnecessarily link with shared gmp/mpfr Thanks for catching the missing parts. Here is the updated patch. Does this patch look correct? Yes

[Bug c++/38233] [4.4 Regression] 'map' value type + new uninitted const member warnings causes error

2008-11-26 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug libgomp/38270] libgomp test failures due to missing memory barrier

2008-11-26 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 22:08 --- I'm about to take off for a long holiday weekand and haven't finished testing, but it fixes the test failures to copy mutex.h from libgomp/config/linux/ia64 to libgomp/config/linux/powerpc and update the comments.

[Bug testsuite/28870] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] configuring, over-riding timeout values in testsuite

2008-11-26 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #27 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 22:16 --- Subject: Bug 28870 Author: janis Date: Wed Nov 26 22:15:07 2008 New Revision: 142230 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142230 Log: PR testsuite/28870 * lib/objc.exp

[Bug c/38281] New: ice: Segmentation fault

2008-11-26 Thread regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
++ --prefix=/home/regehr : (reconfigured) ../configure --program-prefix=current- --enable-languages=c,c++ --prefix=/home/regehr Thread model: posix gcc version 4.4.0 20081126 (experimental) (GCC) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/volatile/tmp69$ cat small.c typedef unsigned short int uint16_t; inline uint16_t

[Bug rtl-optimization/38281] ice: Segmentation fault

2008-11-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-27 00:37 --- #0 0x00487a55 in reg_referenced_p (x=0x42f137d0, body=0x0) at /Users/apinski/src/local/gcc/gcc/rtlanal.c:737 #1 0x00af72a5 in distribute_notes (notes=0x42f134b0, from_insn=0x42f12a50, i3=0x42f12a80, i2=0x42f12a50,

[Bug rtl-optimization/38281] ice: Segmentation fault

2008-11-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-27 00:38 --- 12578 else if (i2 != 0 next_nonnote_insn (i2) == i3 12579 reg_referenced_p (XEXP (note, 0), PATTERN (i2))) (gdb) p debug_rtx(i2) (note 20 19 21 3 NOTE_INSN_DELETED) --

[Bug rtl-optimization/38281] [4.4 Regression] ice: Segmentation fault

2008-11-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ice: Segmentation fault |[4.4 Regression] ice: |

[Bug fortran/38282] New: Add the remaining HPF bit intrinsics

2008-11-26 Thread w6ws at earthlink dot net
In 4.4, the LEADZ and TRAILZ intrinsics were added. LEADZ is one of the HPF intrinsics. However the other HPF bit intrinsics, POPCNT and POPPAR, were not included. POPCNT and POPPAR are present in many other compilers, and have usually been implemented along with LEADZ. This is because

[Bug rtl-optimization/38281] [4.4 Regression] ice: Segmentation fault

2008-11-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-27 01:00 --- This patch fixes the ICE: Index: combine.c === --- combine.c (revision 142231) +++ combine.c (working copy) @@ -12575,7 +12575,7 @@

[Bug testsuite/35677] Intermitent failure FAIL: libgomp.fortran/crayptr2.f90

2008-11-26 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-27 02:07 --- Also see failure on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11. -- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgomp/38283] New: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pr25162.f

2008-11-26 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/ /te st/gnu/gcc/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/pr25162.f -B/test/gnu/gcc/objd ir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/./libgomp/ -I/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 /./libgomp -I/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libgomp/testsuite/..

[Bug libgomp/38283] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pr25162.f

2008-11-26 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-27 04:08 --- emutls_alloc is called with the following struct __emutls_object *: (gdb) emutls_alloc (obj=0x400011d0) at ../../../gcc/libgcc/../gcc/emutls.c:95 95 { (gdb) p/x $r26 $7 = 0x400011d0 (gdb) p *(struct

[Bug libgomp/38283] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pr25162.f

2008-11-26 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-11-27 04:13 --- Subject: Re: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/pr25162.f Attached full .s file. Dave --- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-11-27 04:13 --- Created an attachment (id=16781) --

[Bug middle-end/38284] New: verify_stmts failed when compile with -O2 -fira -fipa-pta -fPIC

2008-11-26 Thread linuxl4 at sohu dot com
[~/tmp]$gcc -v [~/tmp]$gcc version 4.4.0 20081126 (experimental) (GCC) [~/tmp]$g++ -O2 -fira -fipa-pta -fPIC -MD Grid_public.Tpo -c Grid_public.cc [~/tmp]$In file included from ../../src/meta_programming.hh:27, from ../../src/C_Integer.hh:27, from ../../src

[Bug middle-end/38284] verify_stmts failed when compile with -O2 -fira -fipa-pta -fPIC

2008-11-26 Thread linuxl4 at sohu dot com
--- Comment #1 from linuxl4 at sohu dot com 2008-11-27 04:20 --- Created an attachment (id=16782) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16782action=view) the preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38284

[Bug middle-end/38284] verify_stmts failed when compile with -O2 -fira -fipa-pta -fPIC

2008-11-26 Thread linuxl4 at sohu dot com
--- Comment #2 from linuxl4 at sohu dot com 2008-11-27 04:20 --- Created an attachment (id=16783) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16783action=view) source file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38284

[Bug middle-end/38284] verify_stmts failed when compile with -O2 -fira -fipa-pta -fPIC

2008-11-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-27 04:23 --- -fipa-pta is useless really because it only does analysis and nothing uses the information it gathers. Also -fira is on by default anyways. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What

[Bug fortran/38282] Add the remaining HPF bit intrinsics

2008-11-26 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |steven at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org