[Bug ada/38315] New: Unclear type error message when inheriting from interface and tagged type

2008-11-29 Thread fraser at thewhitelion dot org
Example code at the end. When I compile it, I get this error: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc -c unclear_override.ads unclear_override.ads:13:20: not subtype conformant with operation inherited at line 11 unclear_override.ads:13:20: type of Item does not match The problem is that in real life,

[Bug driver/38316] New: The --help=xxx option does not play well with -pipe or -save-temps

2008-11-29 Thread justinb at math dot berkeley dot edu
I ran into this issue running gcc ${CFLAGS} -Q --help=optimizers, when ${CFLAGS} happened to contain -pipe. When -pipe is turned on, the --help=xxx switch will cause the compiler to print help to stdout, before its usual steps of dumping help-dummy assembly code and letting the driver pipe its

[Bug ada/30827] [Ada] GNAT.compiler_version problem for official releases?

2008-11-29 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 10:33 --- Subject: Bug 30827 Author: ebotcazou Date: Sat Nov 29 10:31:53 2008 New Revision: 142274 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142274 Log: PR ada/30827 * g-comver.adb

[Bug fortran/36463] gfc_get_default_type(): Bad symbol

2008-11-29 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #23 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 11:25 --- Closing. -- janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/38303] poor error message

2008-11-29 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last

[Bug pch/38101] dbxout_expand_expr() doesn't check return value of DECL_VALUE_EXPR()

2008-11-29 Thread d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2008-11-29 13:08 --- Hash table entries should be reordered when writing a PCH. -- d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/38289] procedure( ), pointer rejected

2008-11-29 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 13:38 --- Subject: Bug 38289 Author: janus Date: Sat Nov 29 13:36:35 2008 New Revision: 142276 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142276 Log: 2008-11-29 Janus Weil [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mikael Morin

[Bug fortran/38290] ICE with invalid proc-pointer

2008-11-29 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 13:38 --- Subject: Bug 38290 Author: janus Date: Sat Nov 29 13:36:35 2008 New Revision: 142276 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142276 Log: 2008-11-29 Janus Weil [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mikael Morin

[Bug fortran/38289] procedure( ), pointer rejected

2008-11-29 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 13:39 --- Fixed with r142276. Closing. -- janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/38317] New: buffer overflow detected while building a to be cross-compiled application

2008-11-29 Thread hydergine at seznam dot cz
I am trying to cross-compile DiVinE-MC (http://divine.fi.muni.cz/page.php?page=divine-mc) into Win32 enviroment at this moment. I am using Cmake to put the tool together and Mingw to compile it. The preprocessed source is slightly bigger (1.9MB) but I can't see any way to attach it anyway. I might

[Bug c++/38317] buffer overflow detected while building a to be cross-compiled application

2008-11-29 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 15:50 --- 'as' is not part of GCC. Report the problem to http://sourceware.org/binutils -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/38318] New: moving the allocation of temps out of loops.

2008-11-29 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
consider the following source and timings, were a natural form of a subroutine S1, and two hand optimized forms are timed: cat test.f90 SUBROUTINE S1(N,A) REAL :: A(3) DO I=1,N CALL S2(-A) ENDDO END SUBROUTINE SUBROUTINE S1_opt1(N,A) REAL :: A(3) REAL, ALLOCATABLE :: B(:)

[Bug fortran/37131] inline matmul for small matrix sizes

2008-11-29 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 16:18 --- (In reply to comment #4) Timings on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu: matmul =12.840802 s subroutine without explicit interface: 0.88805580 s subroutine with explicit interface: 0.87605572 s

[Bug tree-optimization/26307] load PRE creates type mismatches

2008-11-29 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 16:25 --- Is this still an issue? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26307

[Bug middle-end/37843] [4.4 Regression] unaligned stack in main due to tail call optimization

2008-11-29 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 16:33 --- Subject: Bug 37843 Author: hjl Date: Sat Nov 29 16:32:35 2008 New Revision: 142278 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142278 Log: 2008-11-29 H.J. Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR middle-end/37843

[Bug libstdc++/38265] STL treats explicit constructors as converting constructors

2008-11-29 Thread konto dot dydaktyczne at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10 from konto dot dydaktyczne at gmail dot com 2008-11-29 16:36 --- (In reply to comment #9) The Standard does not require that std::uninitialized_copy be invoked when constructing an std::vector or std::deque. Moreover, an explicit constructor constructs objects only

[Bug libstdc++/38265] STL treats explicit constructors as converting constructors

2008-11-29 Thread konto dot dydaktyczne at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11 from konto dot dydaktyczne at gmail dot com 2008-11-29 16:40 --- (In reply to comment #10) an explicit constructor constructs objects only where the direct-initialization syntax or where casts are explicitly used. None of these cases occurs in the code above. I

[Bug libstdc++/38265] STL treats explicit constructors as converting constructors

2008-11-29 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #12 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-11-29 17:05 --- Subject: Re: STL treats explicit constructors as converting constructors The Standard does not require that std::uninitialized_copy be invoked when constructing an std::vector or... Sure, but

[Bug fortran/37735] Allocatable components in vectors of derived types cause ICE on assignment

2008-11-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 17:52 --- Subject: Bug 37735 Author: pault Date: Sat Nov 29 17:51:03 2008 New Revision: 142282 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142282 Log: 2008-11-29 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/37735] Allocatable components in vectors of derived types cause ICE on assignment

2008-11-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 17:54 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.3. Thanks for the report. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #5 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-29 18:44 --- Ah, I see the problem in the config.log. The inaccurate output of uname under the i386 kernel on a EMT64 chipset is confusing configure such that... $ ../gcc/configure --prefix=/Users/howarth/inst_gcc

[Bug bootstrap/37660] Error Building libssp, recent update

2008-11-29 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #1 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2008-11-29 18:59 --- Still getting this bootstrap error, as of yesterday's update. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37660

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-29 19:23 --- The uname output looks like a red herring. I substituted a script for uname that executes... #!/bin/sh uname_aside $@ | /usr/bin/sed 's/i386/x86_64/' and the build still fails. I wonder if we could fix

[Bug rtl-optimization/11826] [ARM] Minor register allocation problem before function return

2008-11-29 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 19:28 --- Can an ARM maintainer please check this bug? Comment #4 suggests this bug is fixed, but it needs re-checking now that IRA has been merged. -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 19:31 --- A starting point would be this: [wolfram:head/gcc/gcc] andreast% svn diff config/i386/t-darwin64 Index: config/i386/t-darwin64 === ---

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #8 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-29 20:03 --- Thanks! With your patch, gcc now makes it into stage 2 and is still building. I would suggest we use... MULTILIB_DIRNAMES = IA32 as Apple often using I386 but also builds for i686-apple-darwin as well. I

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #9 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-29 20:11 --- Andreas, Can you try the proposed patch on darwin9 for the x86-64-apple-darwin9 target? I will do a complete make check on darwin10 with the x86_64-apple-darwin10 triplet. I am surprised by this issue

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 20:24 --- At the time I did x86_64-apple-darwin* stuff I asked apple people if they intend to do multilib on this target, the answer was no. So I did not bother any longer. I do not know if IA32 is correct. I use i386 for

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #11 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-29 20:35 --- Apple wasn't concerned about the multilib issue since they do everything as lipo files. So I suspect it is rather academic on what we choice for the 32-bit subdirectory name. --

[Bug fortran/34143] alloc_comp_constructor.f90 fails with -fdefault-integer-8

2008-11-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 20:43 --- Subject: Bug 34143 Author: pault Date: Sat Nov 29 20:42:22 2008 New Revision: 142284 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142284 Log: 2008-11-24 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/32795] allocatable components are nullified prematurely

2008-11-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 20:43 --- Subject: Bug 32795 Author: pault Date: Sat Nov 29 20:42:22 2008 New Revision: 142284 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142284 Log: 2008-11-24 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/34820] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get, at fortran/trans-array.c:147

2008-11-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 20:43 --- Subject: Bug 34820 Author: pault Date: Sat Nov 29 20:42:22 2008 New Revision: 142284 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142284 Log: 2008-11-24 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug middle-end/37843] [4.4 Regression] unaligned stack in main due to tail call optimization

2008-11-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 21:04 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/37610] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/eh/pr29166.C execution test

2008-11-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 21:05 --- The binutils fix has been checked in, I'll work on configury on Monday. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #12 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-29 21:06 --- The bootstrap is failing at... make DESTDIR= RPATH_ENVVAR=DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH TARGET_SUBDIR=x86_64-apple-darwin10 bindir=/Users/howarth/inst_gcc/bin datadir=/Users/howarth/inst_gcc/share

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #13 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-29 21:09 --- Why is it okay for cc1-checksum.o and cc1plus-checksum.o to differ but not gcc.o? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38314

[Bug middle-end/37843] [4.4 Regression] unaligned stack in main due to tail call optimization

2008-11-29 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #18 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-11-29 21:10 --- It isn't totally fixed: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr37843-3.c scan-assembler-not call[t ]*foo FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr37843-3.c scan-assembler jmp[t ]*foo I only checked in x86 backend change since no one

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 21:20 --- gcc.o differing is severe, while *checksum.o depend on some version information differing. I propose to do a real clean build. No build over build. My build on x86_64-apple-darwin9 is in the last stage, linking

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #15 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-29 21:28 --- It may be due to another patch I was testing. I am doing a clean bootstrap without the other patches. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38314

[Bug fortran/38319] New: Memory leaks in allocatable component expressions

2008-11-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
The following testsuite programs with allocatable components exhibit memory leaks at runtime: alloc_comp_assign_2.f90 FOR_ALL problem(lines 27, 28 and 47) alloc_comp_assign_4.f90 nested constructors(line 56) alloc_comp_basics_2.f90 repeated ALLOCATE (lines 29, 30 and 35)

[Bug fortran/38319] Memory leaks in allocatable component expressions

2008-11-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last

[Bug fortran/32795] allocatable components are nullified prematurely

2008-11-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #18 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 21:56 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.3. Thanks for the report! Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/29987] libgomp.c++/ctor-9.C failure

2008-11-29 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 22:05 --- Subject: Bug 29987 Author: ebotcazou Date: Sat Nov 29 22:04:25 2008 New Revision: 142286 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=142286 Log: PR target/29987 * config/sparc/sol2.h

[Bug target/29987] libgomp.c++/ctor-9.C failure

2008-11-29 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 22:08 --- Thanks for the patch. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/36998] [4.3/4.4 regression] Ada bootstrap broken on i586-*-*

2008-11-29 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #32 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 22:13 --- BTW, unless the asserts are reenabled again (they are currently disabled for these reasons), this isn't a regression, I don't think we ever emitted DW_CFA_GNU_args_size correctly in such cases. OK, thanks

[Bug middle-end/19020] libcalls are removed (-ftrapv does not work)

2008-11-29 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 22:19 --- libcalls are gone in 4.4 and later. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/19020] libcalls are removed (-ftrapv does not work)

2008-11-29 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 22:23 --- I'm not sure if this bug is fixed, though. -ftrapv is still broken afaik. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020

[Bug middle-end/19020] libcalls are removed (-ftrapv does not work)

2008-11-29 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 22:29 --- I'm not sure if this bug is fixed, though. -ftrapv is still broken afaik. Probably, but let's ditch antiquated stuff and start afresh. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020

[Bug middle-end/35560] Missing CSE/PRE for memory operations involved in virtual call.

2008-11-29 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-29 22:42 --- Looks like something alias related - so CCing Richi. -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/38320] New: missed movd opcode (32bits mm - r/m32).

2008-11-29 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
#include mmintrin.h int foo( __m64 x ) { int y; __builtin_memcpy( y, x, sizeof( y ) ); return y; } gcc movd.c -O2 -S produces: foo:movq%xmm0, -24(%rsp) movl-24(%rsp), %eax ret while 'movd xmm0, eax' was expected. -- Summary: missed movd

[Bug target/38320] missed movd opcode (32bits mm - r/m32).

2008-11-29 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-11-30 00:51 --- You need -mtune=core to generate movd %xmm0, %rax. Gcc 4.4 works. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/38314] multilib bootstrap broken for x86_64-apple-darwin10

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #16 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-30 00:57 --- The problem was a dirty build directory. A clean bootstrap has completed and a complete make check for -m32 and -m64 is underway under darwin10. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38314

[Bug testsuite/38321] New: gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/linkage-y.c compiles wrong architecture

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
When running make check on a build of current gcc trunk built for the x86_64-apple-darwin10 target, I discovered that the gcc.misc-tests/linkage.c link test is failing due to a flaw in the linkage,exp script. The test fails as follows... Running /sw/src/fink.build/gcc44-4.3.999-20081129/gcc-4.4

[Bug c/38322] New: ICE in gcc.dg/cpp/trad/include.c -fno-show-column at -m32 and -m64

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
The gcc.dg/cpp/trad/include.c -fno-show-column compilation test ICEs with... /sw/src/fink.build/gcc44-4.3.999-20081129/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc44-4.3.999-20081129/darwin_objdir/gcc/ /sw/src/fink.build/gcc44-4.3.999-20081129/gcc-4.4-20081129/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/trad

[Bug fortran/38323] New: gfortran.dg/parameter_array_init_3.f90 -O compilation test ICEs at -m32 and -m64

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
The gfortran.dg/parameter_array_init_3.f90 -O compilation test ICEs at -m32 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 as follows... Executing on host: /sw/src/fink.build/gcc44-4.3.999-20081129/darwin_objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc44-4.3.999-20081129/darwin_objdir/gcc

[Bug fortran/38323] gfortran.dg/parameter_array_init_3.f90 -O compilation test ICEs at -m32 and -m64

2008-11-29 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #1 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-11-30 03:12 --- Since the segfault is in f91, how can I obtain a backtrace for this? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38323

[Bug fortran/37469] Invalid GMP usage

2008-11-29 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 03:51 --- *** Bug 38323 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/38323] gfortran.dg/parameter_array_init_3.f90 -O compilation test ICEs at -m32 and -m64

2008-11-29 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 03:51 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37469 *** -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/34820] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get, at fortran/trans-array.c:147

2008-11-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 07:42 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.3 Thanks for the report Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/38324] New: Wrong lbound given to allocatable components

2008-11-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
This was identified in comment #13 of PR34143 and is not fixed by the patch for that PR. The problem of conversion shows up even without -fdefault-integer-8 along with bound problems as shown by the following code: integer, parameter :: ik=4 type :: struct integer(4), allocatable :: ib(:) end

[Bug fortran/34143] alloc_comp_constructor.f90 fails with -fdefault-integer-8

2008-11-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-30 07:50 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.3. Comment #13 has migrated to PR38324. Thanks for the report Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added