[Bug target/39942] Nonoptimal code - leaveq; xchg %ax,%ax; retq

2009-05-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #47 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 07:12 --- Subject: Bug 39942 Author: jakub Date: Sat May 16 07:12:02 2009 New Revision: 147607 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147607 Log: PR target/39942 * final.c (label_to_max_skip):

[Bug ada/40166] New: Ada compiler unable to build libraries

2009-05-16 Thread bechir dot zalila at gmail dot com
Due to the change given below. Ada compiler under all platforms is no longer able to build libraries. The path to TOOLS_TARGET_PAIRS is incorrect in gnattools/Makefile.in resulting in the use of the dummy mlib-tgt-specific.adb for all platforms.

[Bug ada/40166] Ada compiler unable to build libraries

2009-05-16 Thread bechir dot zalila at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from bechir dot zalila at gmail dot com 2009-05-16 07:42 --- Created an attachment (id=17881) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17881action=view) A patchfile that fixes the problem A patchfile that fixes the problem --

[Bug ada/40166] Ada compiler unable to build libraries

2009-05-16 Thread bechir dot zalila at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from bechir dot zalila at gmail dot com 2009-05-16 07:43 --- (In reply to comment #1) Created an attachment (id=17881) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17881action=view) [edit] A patchfile that fixes the problem It would be great to fix the problem

[Bug ada/40166] [4.4/4.5 regression] Ada compiler unable to build libraries

2009-05-16 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug ada/40166] [4.4/4.5 regression] Ada compiler unable to build libraries

2009-05-16 Thread bechir dot zalila at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from bechir dot zalila at gmail dot com 2009-05-16 08:15 --- Created an attachment (id=17882) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17882action=view) A correctly formatted version of the patch A correctly formatted version of the patch -- bechir dot

[Bug fortran/40167] New: wrong initialization of local variable in a recursive subroutine

2009-05-16 Thread francois dot jacq at irsn dot fr
In the following program, env%n should be equal to zero when entering the routine titi but one gets the output : 10 0 5 10 instead of 10 0 5 0 as if the local variable env was declared save within titi. Notice that the bug disappears if the allocatable array a is deleted in the

[Bug middle-end/40168] New: missing unrolling/scalarization/reassoc/free

2009-05-16 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
The testcase to be attached can be compiled with gfortran -O3 -march=native -ffast-math -funroll-loops -ffree-line-length-200 test.f90 and as discussed in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-05/msg00416.html shows some limitations in optimization of gcc 4.3 4.4 and 4.5 -- Summary:

[Bug middle-end/40168] missing unrolling/scalarization/reassoc/free

2009-05-16 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #1 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-05-16 09:36 --- Created an attachment (id=17883) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17883action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40168

[Bug fortran/40168] missing unrolling/scalarization/reassoc/free

2009-05-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 09:54 --- translating buffer1 = 0.0_dp to (void) __builtin_memset ((void *) buffer1, 0, 648); pessimizes the middle-end analysis because buffer1 is now addressable and escapes. The maybe valid (if

[Bug fortran/40168] missing unrolling/scalarization/reassoc/free

2009-05-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 10:04 --- Like so: Index: trans-expr.c === --- trans-expr.c(revision 147583) +++ trans-expr.c(working copy) @@ -4430,7 +4430,8 @@

[Bug middle-end/39301] ICE in register_overhead, at bitmap.c:115

2009-05-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 10:25 --- Please post it to gcc-patches with an appropriate ChangeLog entry. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39301

[Bug fortran/36031] ARM -fshort-enums attribute not emitted for Fortran

2009-05-16 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug fortran/40168] missing unrolling/scalarization/reassoc/free

2009-05-16 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #4 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-05-16 11:19 --- (In reply to comment #3) Like so: Index: trans-expr.c === --- trans-expr.c(revision 147583) +++ trans-expr.c(working copy) @@

[Bug fortran/40168] missing unrolling/scalarization/reassoc/free

2009-05-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 11:20 --- With that patch and -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -mfpmath=sse -msse2 --param max-completely-peel-times=27 --param max-completely-peeled-insns=1500 --params for allow unrolling of all innermost loops I get

[Bug fortran/40168] missing unrolling/scalarization/reassoc/free

2009-05-16 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #6 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-05-16 11:31 --- (In reply to comment #5) This looks somewhat different from what I get here. trunk without patch: vond...@pcihopt3:/data03/vondele/contract gfortran -O3 -march=native -ffast-math -funroll-loops -ffree-line-length-200

[Bug fortran/40168] missing unrolling/scalarization/reassoc/free

2009-05-16 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-05-16 11:39 --- Subject: Re: missing unrolling/scalarization/reassoc/free On Sat, 16 May 2009, jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk wrote: --- Comment #6 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-05-16 11:31 --- (In reply to comment #5)

[Bug fortran/40168] missing unrolling/scalarization/reassoc/free

2009-05-16 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #8 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-05-16 12:20 --- (In reply to comment #7) Subject: Re: missing unrolling/scalarization/reassoc/free so, double good news. First, the unrelated other testcase that speeds up by 30% does this thanks to this patch only. This is a

[Bug bootstrap/40169] New: [4.5 Regression] bootstrap broken again!-(

2009-05-16 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
Bootstrapping revision 147608 on powerpc-apple-darwin9 failed at stage2 with: ... /opt/gcc/darwin_buildw/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/opt/gcc/darwin_buildw/./prev-gcc/ -B/opt/gcc/gcc4.5w/powerpc-apple-darwin9/bin/ -B/opt/gcc/gcc4.5w/powerpc-apple-darwin9/bin/ -B/opt/gcc/gcc4.5w/powerpc-apple-darwin9/lib/

[Bug bootstrap/40169] [4.5 Regression] bootstrap broken again!-(

2009-05-16 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #1 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-05-16 12:30 --- Seen on sparc-linux too. -- laurent at guerby dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/40168] missing unrolling/scalarization/reassoc/free

2009-05-16 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #9 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-05-16 12:39 --- BTW, the patch also applies to 4.4_branch and has the same positive effect... pretty please ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40168

[Bug tree-optimization/40157] ICE with -floop-block

2009-05-16 Thread debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
--- Comment #3 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2009-05-16 12:48 --- a patch would be appreciated, even if it's not applied directly in the 4.4 branch. Matthias -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40157

[Bug target/40153] Long long comparison optimized away incorrectly in Thumb code.

2009-05-16 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 12:53 --- Subject: Bug 40153 Author: rearnsha Date: Sat May 16 12:53:22 2009 New Revision: 147613 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147613 Log: PR target/40153 * arm.md

[Bug target/40153] Long long comparison optimized away incorrectly in Thumb code.

2009-05-16 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 13:28 --- Subject: Bug 40153 Author: rearnsha Date: Sat May 16 13:28:27 2009 New Revision: 147614 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147614 Log: PR target/40153 * arm.md

[Bug fortran/39782] [4.3/4.4 Regression] IO depends on uninitialised value

2009-05-16 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 13:38 --- Yes, lets skip 4.3 and close this. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/40168] missing unrolling/scalarization/reassoc/free

2009-05-16 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 13:46 --- Nice for a one liner patch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40168

[Bug target/40153] Long long comparison optimized away incorrectly in Thumb code.

2009-05-16 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug fortran/40164] Fortran 2003: Arrays of procedure pointers (using PPCs)

2009-05-16 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 14:09 --- Adding in the test case a line like print *, f_array(1)%f(3.,5.) produces a segfault in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref (trans-array.c, 2414). -- janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug c/40170] New: multiple movzx instructions generated when no partial register stall is evident

2009-05-16 Thread adam at consulting dot net dot nz
#include stdint.h #include stdio.h uint8_t nibble(size_t addr) { size_t byte_addr; uint8_t bit; __asm__(shr $1, %[addr]; setc %[bit]\n : [addr] =rm (byte_addr), [bit] =rm (bit) : [addr] (addr) : cc); uint8_t byte=((uint8_t *) byte_addr)[0]; byte = bit;

[Bug c/40171] New: GCC does not pass -mtune and -march options to assembler!

2009-05-16 Thread vvv at ru dot ru
GNU Assembler support optimization options, but GCC does not pass -mtune and -march options to assembler! For full optimization it's required to use this twice: # gcc ... -mtune=core2 -Wa,-mtune=core2 There is no default passing optimization options from GCC to AS. But many programmers imply

[Bug middle-end/39301] ICE in register_overhead, at bitmap.c:115

2009-05-16 Thread lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
--- Comment #13 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2009-05-16 14:37 --- Subject: Re: ICE in register_overhead, at bitmap.c:115 On May 13, 2009, at 9:32 PM, bje at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: The test case does not run in a GB of RAM on my x86-64 system. It sends the system

[Bug middle-end/40169] [4.5 Regression] bootstrap broken again!-(

2009-05-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 14:45 --- I can only assume ia64 too: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2009-05/msg00131.html -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/40168] missing unrolling/scalarization/reassoc/free

2009-05-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 14:48 --- Part of this optimization could (should) be done in the middle-end see PR 36602. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40168

[Bug middle-end/40172] New: [4.5 Regression] Revision 147596 breaks bootstrap ia ia64

2009-05-16 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Revision 147596: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-05/msg00572.html breaks bootstrap on ia64. A testcase: [...@gnu-12 prev-gcc]$ cat /tmp/x.i struct rtx_def; typedef struct rtx_def *rtx; extern int foo; extern int bar; extern int test (void); extern int xxx; int test (void) { if (((rtx)

[Bug middle-end/40172] [4.5 Regression] Revision 147596 breaks bootstrap ia ia64

2009-05-16 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-05-16 15:18 --- *** Bug 40169 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/40169] [4.5 Regression] bootstrap broken again!-(

2009-05-16 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-05-16 15:18 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 40172 *** -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/40172] [4.5 Regression] Revision 147596 breaks bootstrap

2009-05-16 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
-- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker Summary|[4.5 Regression] Revision |[4.5

[Bug c/40172] [4.5 Regression] Revision 147596 breaks bootstrap

2009-05-16 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-05-16 15:31 --- This has also been reported at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-05/msg00974.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40172

[Bug fortran/36031] ARM -fshort-enums attribute not emitted for Fortran

2009-05-16 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 16:11 --- Subject: Bug 36031 Author: fxcoudert Date: Sat May 16 16:11:11 2009 New Revision: 147615 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147615 Log: PR fortran/36031 * decl.c

[Bug fortran/36031] ARM -fshort-enums attribute not emitted for Fortran

2009-05-16 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 16:12 --- Probably fixed on trunk. Please reopen if not. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/40172] [4.5 Regression] Revision 147596 breaks bootstrap

2009-05-16 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-05-16 16:12 --- Here is a testcase for more problems: [...@gnu-12 prev-gcc]$ cat /tmp/x.i struct rtx_def; typedef struct rtx_def *rtx; extern int foo; extern int bar; extern int xxx; int test (void) { if (((rtx) 0 != (rtx)

[Bug fortran/31243] truncating strings longer than 2**32 characters

2009-05-16 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 16:15 --- Patch posted for the compile-time part of this PR: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-05/msg01013.html Here are three testcases that should be handled when runtime checking is performed: $ cat a3.f90

[Bug c++/40007] [4.5 regression] specialization causes access problem in primary template

2009-05-16 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 16:18 --- Created an attachment (id=17884) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17884action=view) A candidate patch I am testing this patch at the moment. Could you please test it in your environment and tell me

[Bug fortran/37577] Change internal array descriptor format for better syntax, C interop TR, rank 15

2009-05-16 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 16:36 --- Subject: Bug 37577 Author: tkoenig Date: Sat May 16 16:36:22 2009 New Revision: 147618 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147618 Log: 2009-05-16 Thomas Koenig tkoe...@gcc.gnu.org PR

[Bug c++/40007] [4.5 regression] specialization causes access problem in primary template

2009-05-16 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 16:39 --- By the way, here what I think is happening. During the parsing of template struct yvoid : public xvoid { typedef xvoid::type z; }; We detect that xvoid::type is a use of a typedef that is a member of the

[Bug fortran/31243] truncating strings longer than 2**32 characters

2009-05-16 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 16:53 --- Subject: Bug 31243 Author: fxcoudert Date: Sat May 16 16:53:02 2009 New Revision: 147619 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147619 Log: PR fortran/31243 * resolve.c

[Bug fortran/31243] Detect strings longer than 2**32 characters

2009-05-16 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 17:00 --- Now, these very long strings are caught at compile-time when possible. We should also add runtime checks, for non-constant lengths; three such examples are given in comment #9. Removing the wrong-code keyword:

[Bug c++/40173] New: Calling a constructor from another constructor of the same class

2009-05-16 Thread raven at student dot pwr dot wroc dot pl
Command line: g++ -pedantic -Wall -o test test.cpp Compiler output: none Basically, I created a class with two constructors. One of those is trying to call the other one. The call doesn't seem to have any effect at all. The problem is: g++ allows such a thing with no warnings at all. Apart

[Bug fortran/36031] ARM -fshort-enums attribute not emitted for Fortran

2009-05-16 Thread drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 17:31 --- Subject: Re: ARM -fshort-enums attribute not emitted for Fortran On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 04:12:28PM -, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: Probably fixed on trunk. Please reopen if not. Thanks! I

[Bug c++/40173] Calling a constructor from another constructor of the same class

2009-05-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 17:33 --- The call doesn't seem to have any effect at all. Yes it does, it creates another object and calls that constructor. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug fortran/33197] Fortran 2008: math functions

2009-05-16 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #20 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 17:33 --- Subject: Bug 33197 Author: fxcoudert Date: Sat May 16 17:33:23 2009 New Revision: 147621 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147621 Log: PR fortran/33197 * intrinsic.c

[Bug target/40153] Long long comparison optimized away incorrectly in Thumb code.

2009-05-16 Thread dougkwan at google dot com
--- Comment #6 from dougkwan at google dot com 2009-05-16 17:46 --- Thanks for fixing this. I also submitted a patch yesterday with the same fix and a test case also. The bug is fixed but I think we still want the test case, right? (In reply to comment #4) Subject: Bug 40153

[Bug fortran/33197] Fortran 2008: math functions

2009-05-16 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #21 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 18:09 --- ERFC_SCALED compile-time simplification was committed. TODO (carried on from above): - TAN(X,Y) (= TAN2(X,Y)) - BESSEL_JN and BESSEL_YN: Transitional form is missing - NORM2 - Finish complex (A)TAN(H),

[Bug c++/40173] Calling a constructor from another constructor of the same class

2009-05-16 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-05-16 18:38 --- Note, in the next C++ Standard, what the user wants will be possible, see, e.g.: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2006/n1986.pdf -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40173

[Bug c++/40044] ICE when resolves overloaded functions

2009-05-16 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 18:56 --- ICE confirmed on 4.3.2. On, trunk I get the following error message: test.cc: In function ‘int main()’: test.cc:12: sorry, unimplemented: mangling template_id_expr The input file with numbered line is: 1

[Bug other/40159] [4.5 regression] make all ignores build failures

2009-05-16 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/35670] -O2 fails to compile

2009-05-16 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 20:31 --- I can reproduce it with 4.2.1, but it's fixed with 4.3.2, 4.4.0 and trunk. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/39501] -O -ffinite-math-only gets min(x,y) optimization wrong for soft-float on arm-*-gnueabi

2009-05-16 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 22:25 --- Subject: Bug 39501 Author: rearnsha Date: Sat May 16 22:24:59 2009 New Revision: 147623 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147623 Log: PR target/39501 * arm.md (movsfcc):

[Bug c++/40139] [4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE on invalid use of destructor

2009-05-16 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug middle-end/39301] ICE in register_overhead, at bitmap.c:115

2009-05-16 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 22:42 --- Subject: Bug 39301 Author: hjl Date: Sat May 16 22:42:15 2009 New Revision: 147624 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147624 Log: 2009-05-16 Brad Lucier luc...@math.purdue.edu PR

[Bug target/40153] Long long comparison optimized away incorrectly in Thumb code.

2009-05-16 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 23:04 --- Subject: Bug 40153 Author: rearnsha Date: Sat May 16 23:04:06 2009 New Revision: 147626 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147626 Log: PR target/40153 * arm.md

[Bug target/40153] Long long comparison optimized away incorrectly in Thumb code.

2009-05-16 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-16 23:06 --- (In reply to comment #6) Thanks for fixing this. I also submitted a patch yesterday with the same fix and a test case also. The bug is fixed but I think we still want the test case, right? Sorry, didn't see

[Bug middle-end/39301] ICE in register_overhead, at bitmap.c:115

2009-05-16 Thread lucier at math dot purdue dot edu
--- Comment #15 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2009-05-17 01:09 --- Fixed by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=147624 -- lucier at math dot purdue dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/40172] [4.5 Regression] Revision 147596 breaks bootstrap

2009-05-16 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-17 03:08 --- Also breaks bootstrap on hppa. -- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/40011] Problems with -fwhole-file

2009-05-16 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #18 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-05-17 05:11 --- the patch posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-05/msg00244.html allows cp2k in its single source file form, 640klines as made available in PR40005, to compile with -fwhole-file (using the ulimit -s unlimited