[Bug fortran/41139] [4.5 Regression] a procedure pointer call as actual argument

2009-08-22 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #12 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-22 08:57 --- In order to avoid the error reported in comment #8, I have tested the following patches: (1) Index: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c === ---

[Bug fortran/41139] [4.5 Regression] a procedure pointer call as actual argument

2009-08-22 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-22 09:19 --- (In reply to comment #12) @@ -3512,8 +3513,7 @@ gfc_get_proc_ptr_comp (gfc_se *se, gfc_e e2 = gfc_copy_expr (e); e2-expr_type = EXPR_VARIABLE; gfc_conv_expr (comp_se, e2); - comp_se.expr =

[Bug fortran/41139] [4.5 Regression] a procedure pointer call as actual argument

2009-08-22 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #14 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-22 09:27 --- Dominique, can you post your dump for comment #4 (especially the call to o%f)? Is this what you want? o.f = add; { real(kind=4) D.1533; static real(kind=4) C.1532 = 2.0e+0; static real(kind=4)

[Bug debug/40660] [4.5 Regression] Wierd break points with 4.5, works with 4.4

2009-08-22 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-22 09:38 --- Sorry I was out on vacation. I will take a look. Well, I only CCed you yesterday :-) Thanks for taking a look! I rechecked: It is indeed Rev. 149722 which caused the problem of this PR (as described in comment 2).

[Bug target/40718] Invalid code produced with -foptimize-sibling-calls

2009-08-22 Thread slyfox at inbox dot ru
--- Comment #5 from slyfox at inbox dot ru 2009-08-22 18:38 --- (In reply to comment #3) Created an attachment (id=18413) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18413action=view) [edit] patch to fix the failure Sibcalls of any kind should be done through call-clobbered

[Bug fortran/28039] Warn when ignoring extra characters in the format specification

2009-08-22 Thread bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-22 23:21 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-08/msg00324.html -- bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/28039] Warn when ignoring extra characters in the format specification

2009-08-22 Thread bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 02:27 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-08/msg00324.html -- bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/41081] redundant ZERO_EXTENDs

2009-08-22 Thread amodra at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from amodra at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 02:57 --- Subject: Bug 41081 Author: amodra Date: Sun Aug 23 02:57:26 2009 New Revision: 151022 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151022 Log: PR target/41081 * fwprop.c (try_fwprop_subst):

[Bug fortran/32715] improve diagnostics of attempted allocation of non-array

2009-08-22 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 03:39 --- Fixed by revision 151023. No plans for a back port. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/41081] redundant ZERO_EXTENDs

2009-08-22 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Comment #7 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-08-23 03:49 --- . -- amodra at bigpond dot net dot au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/41081] redundant ZERO_EXTENDs

2009-08-22 Thread amodra at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from amodra at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 03:53 --- Subject: Bug 41081 Author: amodra Date: Sun Aug 23 03:53:02 2009 New Revision: 151025 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=151025 Log: PR target/41081 * config/rs6000/rs6000.md