--- Comment #21 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-08-31 06:52 ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> > Sigh, the patch doesn't fix alpha failure :(
>
> It also doensn't fix reliably the failure on i?86. Is your alpha
> failure on lto branch or on trunk?
It is on the trunk. However, I have
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-31 06:21 ---
I think this is a duplicate of bug 323. What target are you using?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41195
--- Comment #5 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-31 06:20 ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-08/msg01291.html
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from mehta at roguewave dot com 2009-08-31 03:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=18453)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18453&action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41195
A simple sequence of floating point calculations gives different results on
optimized builds and unoptimized builds. I have seen some bug reports, but this
one is different as the error is reproduced only when the floating point
calculation in question is called from a library. If i create a simple
--- Comment #9 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-31 03:05 ---
Patch for remaining issues posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-08/msg01614.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30789
--- Comment #3 from justineuro at yahoo dot com 2009-08-31 01:16 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > This is a bug in your installation of GCC and cygwin.
> Thanks for the reply. I have since re-installed and subsequently got an
> "undefined reference to _winm...
--- Comment #8 from urbanjost at comcast dot net 2009-08-31 01:12 ---
Subject: Re: NAMELIST input with just a comment ("&NAME ! comment \") fails
Oops. That was 2008;
ISO/IEC SC22/WG5/N1723 CD 1539-1 08-007r2:2008/03/11; even though the
statements still appear in it
that you referen
--- Comment #7 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2009-08-31 00:30 ---
Subject: Re: NAMELIST input with just a comment ("&NAME ! comment \") fails
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:07:34AM -, urbanjost at comcast dot net wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #6 from urbanjost
--- Comment #2 from justineuro at yahoo dot com 2009-08-31 00:09 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is a bug in your installation of GCC and cygwin.
Thanks for the reply. I have since re-installed and subsequently got an
"undefined reference to _winm...@16' error". It turns out I had
--- Comment #6 from urbanjost at comcast dot net 2009-08-31 00:07 ---
Subject: Re: NAMELIST input with just a comment ("&NAME ! comment \") fails
Because of 10.11.3.3-4 I believe (1) of 10.10.1 is intended to mean
"throughout" and not "preceding"; and that
10.10.1 (2) through (5) shou
--- Comment #1 from hdasch at gmail dot com 2009-08-30 20:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=18452)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18452&action=view)
Preprocessed test case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41194
Error messages:
/tmp/ccgtrVyI.o: In function `Color':
/home/chromium/chromium/src/third_party/WebKit/WebCore/platform/ColorData.gperf:254:
undefined reference to `findColor(char const*, unsigned int)'
/home/chromium/chromium/src/third_party/WebKit/WebCore/platform/ColorData.gperf:254:
undefined re
--- Comment #5 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2009-08-30 18:54 ---
Subject: Re: NAMELIST input with just a comment ("&NAME ! comment \") fails
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 06:15:07PM -, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
>
> Strictly speaking, Steve, I think
--- Comment #1 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-08-30 18:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=18451)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18451&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41193
=c,c++,fortran
--disable-multilib --with-ppl=/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/
--with-cloog=/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.5.0 20090830 (experimental) [trunk revision 151229] (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-c' '-O2' '-ffast-math'
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 18:15
---
Strictly speaking, Steve, I think you are correct.
I have not finished my review of the standard. This is the first time I have
seen namelist used like this for command line input. I suspect because it
allows on
--- Comment #3 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2009-08-30 17:58 ---
Subject: Re: NAMELIST input with just a comment ("&NAME ! comment \") fails
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 05:48:15PM -, kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #2 from kargl at g
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 17:48 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Thanks for report , I will fix this.
>
It's not broken.
--
steve
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #3 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 17:34 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > These were added by HJ. Either we need to fixinclude stdlib.h or not define
> > these based on a configure test (I guess the former is more robust if
> > ia32in
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 17:32
---
Thanks for report , I will fix this.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from ami_stuff at o2 dot pl 2009-08-30 16:57 ---
With -m68060 -O1 -fomit-frame-pointer:
GCC 4.1.2/GCC 4.2.5:
#NO_APP
.text
.even
.globl _MUL64
_MUL64:
movm.l #0x3e00,-(sp)
move.l 28(sp),a1
move.l 24(sp),a0
#APP
| I
If just a comment is in the NAMELIST input the READ fails
VERSION:
gfortran -dumpversion
GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.3.2 20080827 (beta) 2
Copyr
--- Comment #6 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-08-30 14:35 ---
committed to trunk, 4.4 will follow.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41122
--- Comment #5 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-08-30 14:26 ---
Subject: Bug 41122
Author: bonzini
Date: Sun Aug 30 14:26:37 2009
New Revision: 151227
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151227
Log:
2009-08-30 Paolo Bonzini
PR ada/41122
* configure
--- Comment #9 from drangon dot mail at gmail dot com 2009-08-30 13:53
---
yes, the issue should be fixed, wxWidgets works fine now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39832
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 11:52 ---
Subject: Bug 41186
Author: rguenth
Date: Sun Aug 30 11:52:13 2009
New Revision: 151226
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151226
Log:
2009-08-30 Richard Guenther
PR tree-optimization/
--- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-08-30 11:25 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL:
ext/pb_ds/regression/hash_data_map_rand.cc
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #19 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-08-29 19:52 ---
> Sigh, the patch doesn'
--- Comment #1 from shcherbakov at daad-alumni dot de 2009-08-30 10:14
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41188 ***
--
shcherbakov at daad-alumni dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from shcherbakov at daad-alumni dot de 2009-08-30 10:14
---
*** Bug 41189 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41188
--- Comment #1 from shcherbakov at daad-alumni dot de 2009-08-30 10:14
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41188 ***
--
shcherbakov at daad-alumni dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from shcherbakov at daad-alumni dot de 2009-08-30 10:14
---
*** Bug 41190 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41188
--- Comment #2 from shcherbakov at daad-alumni dot de 2009-08-30 10:13
---
*** Bug 41191 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41188
--- Comment #1 from shcherbakov at daad-alumni dot de 2009-08-30 10:13
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41188 ***
--
shcherbakov at daad-alumni dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
This bug was discovered while adapting MSP430 port for GCC 4.x and is
persistent at least in both GCC 4.2.4 and 4.3.4.
This description consists of a problem description, a detailed reason analysis
pointing out exact GCC functions, and a proposed solution.
--
This bug was discovered while adapting MSP430 port for GCC 4.x and is
persistent at least in both GCC 4.2.4 and 4.3.4.
This description consists of a problem description, a detailed reason analysis
pointing out exact GCC functions, and a proposed solution.
--
This bug was discovered while adapting MSP430 port for GCC 4.x and is
persistent at least in both GCC 4.2.4 and 4.3.4.
This description consists of a problem description, a detailed reason analysis
pointing out exact GCC functions, and a proposed solution.
--
--- Comment #1 from shcherbakov at daad-alumni dot de 2009-08-30 10:10
---
A misprint in the description:
After move_invariant_reg() the insn_invalid_p(insn) returns 1 meaning that the
INSN is no longer valid.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41188
This bug was discovered while adapting MSP430 port for GCC 4.x and is
persistent at least in both GCC 4.2.4 and 4.3.4.
This description consists of a problem description, a detailed reason analysis
pointing out exact GCC functions, and a proposed solution.
--
--- Comment #2 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 10:00 ---
I'm not sure it needs really that much changes... After all, the semantics can
probably be simulated completely via replacing the BLOCK-constructs with
contained procedures that are called where the BLOCK originally w
--- Comment #3 from t7 at gmail dot com 2009-08-30 09:43 ---
Only encountered with c++ code.
--
t7 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC build triple
--- Comment #17 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 08:35 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #15)
> > Is there a chance that we get this fixed soon?
> >
> > Rainer
> >
>
> Well, I would like to fix this. Better now then later. But I couldn't find the
> real
--- Comment #11 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 08:33 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > AFAICT DW2 unwind has never worked on x86_64-mingw32, which is why Kai made
> > sjlj the default EH model for that target.
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches
--- Comment #6 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 08:30 ---
This is fully implemented now (except some side-issues which have their own
PRs, like PR 41177 and PR 41178), closing.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Adde
--- Comment #8 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 08:27 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> x86_64-pc-mingw32 is not a primary or secondary platform, moving to P4.
> Please restore to P3 if this also appears on i686-mingw32 or another
> primary or secondary platform.
>
Could you
--- Comment #5 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 08:26 ---
Subject: Bug 37425
Author: domob
Date: Sun Aug 30 08:26:38 2009
New Revision: 151224
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151224
Log:
2009-08-30 Daniel Kraft
PR fortran/37425
* du
--- Comment #8 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 07:44 ---
Fixed in trunk.
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSI
--- Comment #7 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-30 07:26 ---
Subject: Bug 41187
Author: dodji
Date: Sun Aug 30 07:26:29 2009
New Revision: 151223
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151223
Log:
Fix c++/41187
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/41187
48 matches
Mail list logo
