--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 06:07 ---
int const*
Is legal C++, as it means a pointer to int const (which is the same as const
int), the qualifier can appear before after the type specifier.
(void) (q = (const int *) i) // const re-ordered
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 07:13 ---
Subject: Bug 22093
Author: uros
Date: Wed Sep 30 07:13:20 2009
New Revision: 152322
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152322
Log:
PR target/22093
* config/alpha/alpha.md
--- Comment #3 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 07:38 ---
Can you see what a backtrace gives you in a gdb session ? It sounds like you
are out of memory. I'll second what Mikael said in Comment #2 with respect to
being able to bootstrap .
The other question which I have to
--- Comment #40 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-30 08:12 ---
(In reply to comment #39)
static tree
build_function_type_list_1 (bool vaargs, tree return_type, va_list argp)
Passing va_list by value is non-portable. One fix here is to pass argp
by reference. Dunno if that
Compile the attached source code with options -Os -march=armv5te -mthumb, gcc
generates:
push{lr}
cmp r0, #63 // A
beq .L3
cmp r0, #63 // B
bhi .L4
cmp r0, #45
beq .L3
cmp r0, #47
bne
--- Comment #1 from carrot at google dot com 2009-09-30 08:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=18671)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18671action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41514
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-09-30 08:52 ---
Confirmed. Works with gfortran 4.2.4, but not with 4.3.4, 4.4.1, and trunk,
hence a regression.
As noted,
character(3), parameter :: parm(5) = (/'xo ','yo ','ag ','xr ','yr '/)
works.
--
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41511
the attached testcase shows that sizeof(int) is not identical to a compile time
constant of 4.
the first testcase uses sizeof(int) as a bound check, and somehow the call to
the non-existing function is not optimized out.
in the second testcase sizeof(int) is replaced by 4 and the optimization
--- Comment #1 from arjan at linux dot intel dot com 2009-09-30 09:50
---
Created an attachment (id=18672)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18672action=view)
the failing case with sizeof(int)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41516
--- Comment #2 from arjan at linux dot intel dot com 2009-09-30 09:51
---
Created an attachment (id=18673)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18673action=view)
sizeof(int) replaced by 4 and it suddenly optimizes just fine
--
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 09:53 ---
Mine anyway.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 09:58 ---
Subject: Bug 41279
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 30 09:57:56 2009
New Revision: 152324
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152324
Log:
PR target/41279
* cfgloopanal.c (num_loop_insns):
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 10:07 ---
Try using 4U instead of 4 or (size_t) 4 and you'll see it not optimized out
either.
The problem is that the second comparison is done in size_t, unsigned type, so
if argc is say -3, the function doesn't return -1
Gcc behaviour looks like it might be incorrect on thefollowing example.
It relates to the treatment of the pragma. (I cannot provide the .i file
here because then the pragma is stripped out, and this changes the
behaviour of the compiler.)
$ cat test22.c
#include stdio.h
int x;
void foo (void)
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 11:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=18674)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18674action=view)
reduced testcase, part1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41487
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 11:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=18675)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18675action=view)
reduced testcase, part2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41487
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 11:18 ---
Reduced from 453.povray:
lto-g/gcc ./g++ -B. -o povray -nostdlib -shared -fPIC -O -flto torus.3.ii
bezier.3.ii
lto1: internal compiler error: in duplicate_node_data, at ipa-pure-const.c:633
Please submit a full
--- Comment #41 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 11:35
---
(In reply to comment #38)
(In reply to comment #37)
Can you please attach pre-processed source of it so that I can try
running it through a cross-compiler?
Additionally, -fdump-tree-cddce-slim and
--- Comment #42 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 11:37
---
Created an attachment (id=18676)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18676action=view)
Making IPA-SRA ignore va_lists
This patch prevents IPA-SRA from considering va_list structs as candidates for
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 11:51 ---
More reduced:
a.c:
extern C double sqrt (double __x) throw ();
typedef double VECTOR[3];
enum { X = 0, Y = 1, Z = 2, T = 3 };
inline void VLength(double a, const VECTOR b)
{
a = sqrt(b[X] * b[X] + b[Y] * b[Y]
Dear all,
I would like to post a fault report for the GNU C/C++ compiler 4.3.0.
Used invokation line for the GNU C++ compiler:
gcc -c -x c++ -ansi -Wall -Werror -mcpu=603e -fverbose-asm -mbig
-mmultiple -mstring -mstrict-align -meabi -msdata -fno-common
-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -O3
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-30 12:59 ---
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 13:01 ---
During pure_const_read_summary lto_cgraph_encoder_deref returns a reference
to a bogus cgraph node (it's all zeros, just the UID is filled in). Later
the cgraph node gets reused by cgraph_clone_node. So something
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 13:17 ---
The issue here is that loop header copying creates a new induction variable
by moving the use before the definition of D.2708_4 = start_3(D) + i_12.
So it just does what we teach PRE not to do ...
--
--- Comment #43 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-30 13:34 ---
(In reply to comment #42)
Created an attachment (id=18676)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18676action=view) [edit]
Making IPA-SRA ignore va_lists
This patch prevents IPA-SRA from considering
[...@gnu-6 tmp]$ cat x.c
enum foo
{
foo1,
foo2
} foo;
int
bar ()
{
int x;
switch (foo)
{
case foo1:
x = 3;
break;
case foo2:
x = 8;
break;
}
return x;
}
[...@gnu-6 tmp]$ gcc -Wall -S x.c -O
x.c: In function âbarâ:
x.c:10: warning: âxâ may be used
--- Comment #32 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-09-30
13:47 ---
I'm not sure how (or why) but... I checked out gcc trunk rev. 152325, and the
problems seems to have gone away (at least for now).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41357
--- Comment #4 from armin76 at gentoo dot org 2009-09-30 13:49 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Can you see what a backtrace gives you in a gdb session ? It sounds like you
are out of memory. I'll second what Mikael said in Comment #2 with respect to
being able to bootstrap .
Hrm...well,
--- Comment #3 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 13:50 ---
Comment 32 in bug 41357 says that that bug has now gone away again as of
r.152325; I haven't had time to verify that myself yet but perhaps that one
will work for you also?
--
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-09-30
13:55 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regressions] ld: (Warning) Unsatisfied symbol
gomp_tls_data
What kind of TLS do you have on your platform? Also, does reverting the patch
help you any, or do you just end up with the
--- Comment #5 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 14:10 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
It uses GCC's emulated TLS support (don't support HP's TLS implementation).
There were no libgomp failures prior to the change:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-09/msg02555.html
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-09-30 14:14 ---
Subject: Re: New: Unnecessary uninitialized warning
In C, enums may hold any value of the underlying integer type, so this
warning seems correct.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41519
--- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-09-30
14:22 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regressions] ld: (Warning) Unsatisfied symbol
gomp_tls_data
--- Comment #3 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 13:50 ---
Comment 32 in bug 41357 says that that bug
--- Comment #8 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2009-09-30 14:33 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in duplicate_node_data, at ipa-pure-const.c:633
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 13:01
---
During pure_const_read_summary lto_cgraph_encoder_deref returns a
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-09-30 14:38 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in duplicate_node_data, at
ipa-pure-const.c:633
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
--- Comment #8 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2009-09-30 14:33 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 14:38 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
As noted,
character(3), parameter :: parm(5) = (/'xo ','yo ','ag ','xr ','yr '/)
works.
Interestingly, it also works if one places parm into PROGRAM instead of using
it in a
--- Comment #7 from law at redhat dot com 2009-09-30 14:47 ---
Subject: Re: GCC choosing poor code sequence for certain
stores (x86)
On 09/30/09 03:22, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 09:22 ---
For x86-64 we
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 15:20 ---
As mentioned by Joseph, in C enums can hold all values of the undering type.
This is different from C++.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 15:24 ---
Needs re-confirming.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 15:25 ---
Can you check if this still applies? It should be broken on trunk as well
then.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 15:26
---
Fixed by merging the patch from trunk.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 15:27 ---
Mine.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2009-09-30
15:41 ---
Subject: Re: libobjc fails to configure on Solaris
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
Can you check if this still applies? It should be broken on trunk as well
then.
you're right: the problem is
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 15:48 ---
Fixed then.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 16:00 ---
Subject: Bug 41502
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Sep 30 16:00:07 2009
New Revision: 152332
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152332
Log:
2009-09-30 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR
Using the PARAMETER statement in a module subroutine for assigning values to a
character array yields nonsense when printed at runtime. If, instead, the
PARAMETER attribute is used, everything is fine.
gfortran -v yields:
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with:
While
gfortran -O1 -flto -c species.f90
gfortran -O1 -flto -c atom.f90
gfortran -O1 -flto -o species species.o atom.o
works, the following gives an ICE:
gfortran -O1 -flto -g -c species.f90
gfortran -O1 -flto -g -c atom.f90
gfortran -O1 -flto -g -o species species.o atom.o
lto1: error:
--- Comment #50 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
2009-09-30 16:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=18677)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18677action=view)
further simplified lib ext patch
after some discussion with Ian Lance Taylor, I took another look
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 17:06 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41515 ***
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 17:06 ---
*** Bug 41520 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41515
The test above fails on Solaris/SPARC when the native assembler is in use:
output is:
/usr/bin/as: /var/tmp//cc83aiQ4.s, line 23: error: invalid character (0x72)
/usr/bin/as: /var/tmp//cc83aiQ4.s, line 23: error: unknown opcode register
/usr/bin/as: /var/tmp//cc83aiQ4.s, line 23: error:
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 17:18 ---
The easy fix is to change the inline-asm strings to .
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41522
--- Comment #19 from ludovic at ludovic-brenta dot org 2009-09-30 17:35
---
I also applied the patch to GCC 4.4 and confirmed that it fixes this particular
bug. Barring any other blocking problems, Debian will be able to switch to GCC
4.4 as the default Ada compiler. Thank you all
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 18:03 ---
Subject: Bug 22093
Author: uros
Date: Wed Sep 30 18:03:17 2009
New Revision: 152343
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152343
Log:
PR target/22093
* config/alpha/alpha.md
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 18:23 ---
Subject: Bug 22093
Author: uros
Date: Wed Sep 30 18:22:48 2009
New Revision: 152344
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152344
Log:
PR target/22093
* config/alpha/alpha.md
--- Comment #7 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-30 18:24 ---
Fixed.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-30 19:13 ---
It no longer hangs as of revision 152331:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-09/msg02788.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
gcc-4.3.2 and gcc-4.5.0 20090924 (experimental) snapshot generate few vcg files
with syntax errors because of a extra '}' in the graph.
it appears in gcc/graph.c print_rtl_graph_with_bb() sometimes called end_bb()
without a start_bb() and this results in a extra '}' in the output generating
the
--- Comment #1 from twlevo at gmail dot com 2009-09-30 19:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=18678)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18678action=view)
patched graph.c
graph.c for gcc-4.5 used in gcc-4.5.0 20090924 (experimental)
--
Source file from TaoCrypt release 0.9.2 02/5/2007, which is part of MySQL
source tree.
Works with gcc 4.3.3. With gcc 4.4.1, g++ (or gcc) crashes in the compilation
process due to complain from as.
Command line:
% g++ -static-libgcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../include -I./../include
This bug looks very similar to an existing bug 41180. However, the discussion
on that seems to be for 64-bit systems. I'm experiencing the same problem,
except that my Mac is a first generation Mac (hence, a 32-bit kernel) running
Snow Leopard. Not sure if this is the same as that or not.
First,
From http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg02148.html
I can see some issues here with output portability that should be
addressed for objects with LTO information to be portable between hosts.
1. There are some structures lto_*header that include 16-bit or 32-bit
integer fields (plus an
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 19:40 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41180 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #33 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 19:40
---
*** Bug 41525 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #34 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 19:41
---
Fixed in 4.4.2.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
, recent debug changes should be considered, too.
Version signature:
xgcc (GCC) 4.5.0 20090930 (experimental) [trunk revision 152332]
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18676action=view
--
Summary: IPA-SRA segfaults in libstdc++ tests (i.e.
20_util
--- Comment #51 from mrs at apple dot com 2009-09-30 19:45 ---
Looks much better than past versions... Seems like muse-shared-libgcc-ext
should be the default, and possibly that we don't even need the switch?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39888
--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-30 19:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=18679)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18679action=view)
preprocessed testcase
Preprocessed testcase, segfaults with -O2 -g -std=c++0x on alpha-linux-gnu
(also with
--- Comment #1 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 19:50
---
Other portability concerns:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg02157.html
The host portability issue with __attribute__ ((visibility (hidden)))
has already been noted. I suggest conditioning the
--- Comment #52 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk
2009-09-30 19:54 ---
(In reply to comment #51)
Looks much better than past versions... Seems like muse-shared-libgcc-ext
should be the default, and possibly that we don't even need the switch?
thanks Mike, I'll do a
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41485
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41493
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 19:56 ---
Subject: Bug 40996
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Sep 30 19:55:45 2009
New Revision: 152345
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152345
Log:
fortran/
2009-09-30 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
*
--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-30 19:57 ---
Please attach preprocessed source and generated asm file (please follow the
instructions in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#report).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41524
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41217
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41279
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41485
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41491
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41493
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41494
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41497
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41511
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41515
--- Comment #2 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 20:17
---
More portability concerns from
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg02157.html
+/* This needs to be included after config.h. Otherwise, _GNU_SOURCE will not
+ be defined in time to set __USE_GNU in
--- Comment #9 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-30
20:26 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
darwin has -fpic by default.
Oddly, if I build gcc trunk on x86_64 Fedora 10 with CPPFLAGS set to -fPIC and
run the testsuite with -fPIC, I don't see the .eh symbols...
grep
Much of the documentation from design documents, papers and presentations need
to be ported to the internals manual.
Also, from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg02134.html
(A) Details in the patch.
(B) Details missing from the patch.
(C) Lack of general explanation of how to use
From http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg02106.html
You enable LTO by default if a suitable libelf is found. But what if
libelf is present but the target for which GCC is being configured is not
an ELF target? Presumably LTO will not work in that case (i.e., it
requires the target
--- Comment #10 from mrs at apple dot com 2009-09-30 20:54 ---
When targeting darwin10, the .eh symbols don't have to be generated anymore.
They are from darwin.c, darwin_emit_unwind_label.
if (darwin_macosx_version_min
strverscmp (darwin_macosx_version_min, 10.6) = 0)
can be
--- Comment #12 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 21:25 ---
Bad news: the patch doesn't work. I edited the generated config.status so
that it would use bash -x when reinvoking configure as part of --recheck, and
it seems that although the code goes through the switch and
--- Comment #13 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 21:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=18680)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18680action=view)
bash -x log of configure script run
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41418
Consider the following:
=
#include tuple
class A {};
class B : public A {};
int main()
{
std::tupleB* b;
std::tupleA* a1(b); // Compiles fine
std::tupleA* a2(std::move(b)); // Error
return 0;
}
=
Copy constructing a std::tupleA* from a std::tupleB* works fine, but
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 22:16 ---
This was filed earlier by the contributor of IPA-SRA :).
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41503 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 22:16 ---
*** Bug 41527 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 22:17 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-30
22:36 ---
Mike,
I am a fuzzy on the best way to avoid darwin_emit_unwind_label since it is
assigned to a define in darwin.h. The only thing that makes sense to me is...
Index: gcc/config/darwin.c
--- Comment #7 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 22:46 ---
I tried 152326 and the bug has gone away. So, I'm closing this PR.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 22:46 ---
It is unclear what those labels are good for, but if darwin is to support
hot/cold partitioning and FDEs covering it, the emit unwind_label hook (which
is apparently darwin specific only) should be passed also the
--- Comment #53 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-30
23:36 ---
Iain,
We seem to be producing an extra libgcc shared library with the new patch.
In darwin_objdir/stage1-x86_64-apple-darwin10.0.0/libgcc, I see...
libgcc_ext.10.4.dylib libgcc_ext.10.5.dylib
--- Comment #54 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-30
23:38 ---
The new libgcc_s.dylib appears to be only of the native target architecture...
file libgcc_s.dylib
libgcc_s.dylib: Mach-O 64-bit dynamically linked shared library x86_64
file libgcc_s.1.dylib
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
