--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-14 08:58 ---
Probably related with the move to internal preprocessing, see also PR36380.
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-14 10:59 ---
When only D.3 lists them and D.2 doesn't is IMHO a clear sign that they belong
into omp_lib.f90 only and not into omp_lib.h.
These two parameters are never mentioned in the standard except for D.3/D.4
AFAIK, and D.3
--- Comment #1 from zsojka at seznam dot cz 2009-11-14 12:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=19016)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19016action=view)
even shorter testcase
This testcase is invalid C++, gcc gives diagnostics and crashes with the same
error message
--
example code:
#include iostream
using namespace std;
struct test {
test () {
cout test::test() endl;
}
~test() {
cout test::~test() endl;
}
};
struct a {
const test x;
a () : x(test()){
cout
On Linux/ia32, revision 154177 gave:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/930117-1.c -O1 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/930117-1.c -O1 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/930117-1.c -O2 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/930117-1.c -O2
--- Comment #1 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-11-14 16:09 ---
Presumably fixed for 4.5 by revision 154178.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42044
--- Comment #5 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-11-14 16:32 ---
This wrong-code bug also occurs with 4.3.4 on i686-linux, but not with 4.2.4 or
4.1.2, making it a regression. The patch for 4.4 applies cleanly to 4.3 and
fixes the bug there with no new regressions (I tested i686,
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|
--- Comment #2 from nickpelling at nanodome dot com 2009-11-14 16:45
---
Created an attachment (id=19017)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19017action=view)
Test C file for which gcc -O3 should (but currently doesn't) use r14
--
--- Comment #3 from nickpelling at nanodome dot com 2009-11-14 16:48
---
Created an attachment (id=19018)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19018action=view)
This is the assembler file generated by gcc 4.4.1 for the C test file
Note the presence of [sp, #0] in the
--- Comment #4 from nickpelling at nanodome dot com 2009-11-14 16:50
---
Actually, I am targeting ARM (not Thumb1).
I don't currently have easy access to 4.2.1 and 4.3.2, but I am assured that
the former does indeed use r14 and the latter does indeed not use r14.
--
--- Comment #3 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-14 17:07
---
The code compiles without ICE on trunk since at least 2009-09-17.
So lets close it as fixed.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-14 18:17
---
Subject: Bug 42031
Author: rearnsha
Date: Sat Nov 14 18:17:21 2009
New Revision: 154182
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154182
Log:
PR target/42031
* arm.md (adddi_sesidi_di):
--- Comment #3 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-14 18:25
---
Fixed with posted patch
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
The following was reported by John McFarland:
PROGRAM prog
TYPE object
PROCEDURE(), POINTER, NOPASS :: f
END TYPE object
TYPE container
TYPE (object), POINTER :: o(:)
END TYPE container
TYPE (container) :: c
TYPE (object) :: o1, o2
PROCEDURE(), POINTER :: f = NULL()
o1%f = f
! This
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-14 18:35
---
Does anyone recognize this in resolve.c
/* If we have more than one element left in the repeat count,
and we have more than one element left in the target variable,
then create a range
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-14 18:37 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Presumably fixed for 4.5 by revision 154178.
Yes, revision 154178 fixed it on trunk.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-11-14 18:57 ---
Fixed.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #11 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-14 19:24
---
The problems with -O -fipa-pta seem to be fixed since GCC 4.4.0.
I checked all duplicates from comment #4 - #7.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-14 19:30 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Does anyone recognize this in resolve.c
/* If we have more than one element left in the repeat count,
and we have more than one element left in the target variable,
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-14 19:32 ---
which traces to
REMOVE:kargl[207] svn log -r 86443 resolve.c |more
r86443 | rth | 2004-08-23 14:53:14 -0700 (Mon, 23 Aug 2004) | 11 lines
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-14 19:39 ---
Caused by recent changes
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.3.4
Known to work||4.2.4 4.4.3
--- Comment #6 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-14 20:57
---
I tried on another core2duo (x86_64-apple-darwin9), same issue. W/o
extra_gij_ldflags=-Wl,-allow_stack_execute for ecjx_LINK I fail with the same
entry in Library/Logs/CrashReporter:
--- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-14 21:21
---
Confirmed.
Reduced testcase (crashes with -O2 -fwhole-program -fipa-struct-reorg):
=
templateint struct A
{
char c;
void foo(int);
void bar(int i) {
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-14 21:24
---
Interesting, the following patch allows the test case in comment #4 to compile.
Index: data.c
===
--- data.c (revision 154170)
+++ data.c
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 14, 2009, at 2:35 PM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-14
22:35 ---
I guess the easiest is to avoid the special formats and simply use %ld
and long
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2009-11-14 22:44 ---
Subject: Re: lto-elf.c fails to compile on IRIX 6.5
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 14, 2009, at 2:35 PM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
wrote:
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-14 22:35 ---
I guess the easiest is to avoid the special formats and simply use %ld
and long unconditionally.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41996
--- Comment #4 from d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com 2009-11-14
23:35 ---
GCC 4.5.0 20091112 -- works.
--
d dot g dot gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-11-15
01:57 ---
Yes, I have...
[MacPro:darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin10.2.0/libjava] howarth% grep
extra_gij_ldflags *
Makefile:extra_gij_ldflags = -Wl,-allow_stack_execute
I have been testing on a late 2008 MacPro
strne r2, [r3, #0]
streq r2, [r3, #0]
bx lr
.L5:
.align 2
.L4:
.word var
.size foo, .-foo
.comm var,4,4
.ident GCC: (GNU) 4.5.0 20091114 (experimental)
This should be:
cmp r0, #0
ldr r3, .L4
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-15 04:08 ---
Here is an example which also happens on x86 so this is not target specific:
int var;
int g(int);
int foo(int enable, int t, int tt)
{
if (enable)
var |= 1;
else
var = ~1;
return
--- Comment #3 from hutchinsonandy at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-15 04:10
---
Subject: Bug 21078
Author: hutchinsonandy
Date: Sun Nov 15 04:10:20 2009
New Revision: 154188
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154188
Log:
PR target/21078, 21080
* config/avr/avr.c
I failed to build gcc with configuration follows:
../gcc/configure --target=sh-elf --host=i386-pc-mingw32
--build=i686-apple-darwin10 --enable-languages=c --with-gmp=/opt/MinGW
--with-mpfr=/opt/MinGW
I think genmodes should be built on build environment, but there seems it was
built with
--- Comment #1 from monaka at monami-software dot com 2009-11-15 05:54
---
Created an attachment (id=19019)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19019action=view)
build log.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42047
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-15 06:00 ---
Oh I see why this works for me, I install gmp/mpfr in the sysroot and I had
used the sysroot so I don't need to supply --with-gmp/--with-mpfr.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42047
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-15 06:03 ---
Looks like we need a new variable for build includes (that is BUILD_INCLUDES
which does not include GMPINC, PPLINC, DECNUMINC, LIBELFINC, or CLOOGINC).
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #4 from monaka at monami-software dot com 2009-11-15 07:12
---
Looks like we need a new variable for build includes
I think, too. I've built successful with my patch. (I don't send my patch
because it is half-finished.)
--
39 matches
Mail list logo
