[Bug middle-end/45325] [4.6 Regression] target attribute doesn't work with -march=i586

2010-09-23 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last

[Bug c++/45755] New: Member function template is instantiated to perform the copy

2010-09-23 Thread boostcpp at gmail dot com
A member function template is never instantiated to perform the copy of a class object to an object of its class type. But gcc instantiates it if function parameter type is the rvalue reference. Following code shall not output anything if executed. struct S { S() = default ; template

[Bug tree-optimization/45750] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in iterative_hash_expr, at tree.c:6831 on invalid code

2010-09-23 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-23 06:46 --- It is caused by revision 161655: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-07/msg6.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/43772] Errant -Wlogical-op warning when testing limits

2010-09-23 Thread muntyan at fastmail dot fm
--- Comment #4 from muntyan at fastmail dot fm 2010-09-23 06:52 --- Me too. This is real code, from xdgmime library (errno doesn't matter) long retval = -1; ... if ((retval INT_MIN) || (retval INT_MAX) || (errno != 0)) return -1; --

[Bug target/45752] [4.5 regression] ICE in ix86_vectorize_builtin_vec_perm_ok

2010-09-23 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-23 07:20 --- It is caused by revision 155584: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-01/msg00043.html and fixed by revision 161655: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-07/msg6.html on trunk. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/45728] [4.4 Regression] ICE: in gen_lowpart_general, at rtlhooks.c:59 at -O1 when comparing union members

2010-09-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 07:41 --- Subject: Bug 45728 Author: jakub Date: Thu Sep 23 07:41:30 2010 New Revision: 164549 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164549 Log: PR rtl-optimization/45728 * expr.c

[Bug c/35649] Incorrect printf warning: expect double has float

2010-09-23 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 07:54 --- Why is this waiting? It only requires a fix. -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/45728] [4.4 Regression] ICE: in gen_lowpart_general, at rtlhooks.c:59 at -O1 when comparing union members

2010-09-23 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 07:57 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/43772] Errant -Wlogical-op warning when testing limits

2010-09-23 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 08:13 --- (In reply to comment #4) Me too. This is real code, from xdgmime library (errno doesn't matter) long retval = -1; ... if ((retval INT_MIN) || (retval INT_MAX) || (errno != 0)) return

[Bug c/43772] Errant -Wlogical-op warning when testing limits

2010-09-23 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 08:24 --- I don't get a warning in trunk r159764. I think I fixed a similar bug during 4.6. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43772

[Bug fortran/45474] Missing definable check actuals to INTENT(INOUT) dummies of intrinsics

2010-09-23 Thread domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 08:38 --- Subject: Bug 45474 Author: domob Date: Thu Sep 23 08:37:54 2010 New Revision: 164550 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164550 Log: 2010-09-23 Daniel Kraft d...@domob.eu PR fortran/38936

[Bug fortran/44044] [OOP] SELECT TYPE with class-valued function

2010-09-23 Thread domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 08:38 --- Subject: Bug 44044 Author: domob Date: Thu Sep 23 08:37:54 2010 New Revision: 164550 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164550 Log: 2010-09-23 Daniel Kraft d...@domob.eu PR fortran/38936

[Bug fortran/38936] F2003: ASSOCIATE construct / improved SELECT TYPE (a=expr)

2010-09-23 Thread domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 08:38 --- Subject: Bug 38936 Author: domob Date: Thu Sep 23 08:37:54 2010 New Revision: 164550 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164550 Log: 2010-09-23 Daniel Kraft d...@domob.eu PR fortran/38936

[Bug bootstrap/45751] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap failure: at stage 1 xgcc segfault

2010-09-23 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-23 08:39 --- On powerpc-apple-darwin9 I get [karma] gcc/darwin_buildw% gcc/xgcc - Segmentation fault [karma] gcc/darwin_buildw% gcc/xgcc -v xgcc: warning: ­ xgcc(49989) malloc: *** mmap(size=3638091776) failed (error code=12)

[Bug fortran/44044] [OOP] SELECT TYPE with class-valued function

2010-09-23 Thread domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 08:39 --- This implemented bonus feature #2 from comment #3. Closing now. -- domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/45474] Missing definable check actuals to INTENT(INOUT) dummies of intrinsics

2010-09-23 Thread domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 08:40 --- Fixed. -- domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/45754] Driver core dump when duplicating -Wall command line option

2010-09-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 09:12 --- I can't reproduce this on x86_64-linux, so it must be target specific. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/45325] [4.6 Regression] target attribute doesn't work with -march=i586

2010-09-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 09:16 --- Yes, my patch should be a no-op on this failure, it just avoids calling convert_move if it would ICE anyway. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325

[Bug target/45752] [4.5 regression] ICE in ix86_vectorize_builtin_vec_perm_ok

2010-09-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 09:30 --- Confirmed. #2 0x00ec5b41 in ix86_vectorize_builtin_vec_perm_ok ( vec_type=0x75a04dc8, mask=0x75a7d2a0) at /space/rguenther/src/svn/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/config/i386/i386.c:30144 30144

[Bug bootstrap/45751] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap failure: at stage 1 xgcc segfault

2010-09-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45751

[Bug bootstrap/45751] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap failure: at stage 1 xgcc segfault

2010-09-23 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 09:34 --- this appears to be to do with the driver construction of a default macosx-version-min. ./gcc/xgcc -Bgcc -dumpspecs = bus error ./gcc/xgcc -Bgcc -dumpspecs -mmacosx-version-min=10.5 = completes normally. Initial

[Bug tree-optimization/45750] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in iterative_hash_expr, at tree.c:6831 on invalid code

2010-09-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 09:42 --- Mine. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/45756] New: Multiple DECL for array valued PARAMETER (-fwhole-file issue)

2010-09-23 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
Currently, gfc_get_symbol_decl only deals with -fwhole-file issues of module variable (FL_VARIABLE( but not with array-valued (or non-intrinsic-type) parameters (FL_PARAMETER). Thus, for the following program, multiple UIDs will be generated for the program below: module m integer, parameter

[Bug fortran/45756] Multiple DECL for array valued PARAMETER (-fwhole-file issue)

2010-09-23 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 09:59 --- Note: The implementation should honour PR 40571, i.e. array parameters from intrinsic modules, which do not exist as .o file. My current idea is to generate them per use association as local static variable - which

[Bug rtl-optimization/44374] Hoist same instructions in different branches

2010-09-23 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 10:04 --- Subject: Bug 44374 Author: bernds Date: Thu Sep 23 10:04:33 2010 New Revision: 164552 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164552 Log: PR rtl-optimization/44374 * basic-block.h (enum

[Bug rtl-optimization/44374] Hoist same instructions in different branches

2010-09-23 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 10:08 --- Fixed. -- bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/45757] New: Accepts invalid: SHAPE with scalar

2010-09-23 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
I have *not* checked the standard (F2008), but I think the following is invalid as a is not an array but a scalar. gfortran accepts it but does not print any value. integer :: a(3) print *, shape(a(1)) end -- Summary: Accepts invalid: SHAPE with scalar Product: gcc

[Bug c++/35101] Const object creation with mutable field

2010-09-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 10:14 --- The example was wrong, fixed by DR 497 http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#497 -- redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/45758] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE in expr_invariant_in_loop_p

2010-09-23 Thread Joost dot VandeVondele at pci dot uzh dot ch
Recent trunk crashes on the following testcase: gfortran -c -floop-block -O3 bug.f90 MODULE util INTEGER, PARAMETER :: int_4=4 INTERFACE sort MODULE PROCEDURE sort_int_4v END INTERFACE CONTAINS SUBROUTINE sort_int_4v ( arr, n, index ) INTEGER(KIND=int_4), INTENT(INOUT)

[Bug fortran/45757] Accepts invalid: SHAPE with scalar

2010-09-23 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 10:34 --- Arguments. SOURCE shall be a scalar or array of any type Examples. The value of SHAPE (A (2:5, −1:1) ) is [4, 3]. The value of SHAPE (3) is the rank-one array of size zero. It seems the current behaviour is

[Bug bootstrap/45751] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap failure: at stage 1 xgcc segfault

2010-09-23 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 10:35 --- if the array was intended to be an array of structs then this fixes: Index: gcc/config/darwin-driver.c === --- gcc/config/darwin-driver.c (revision

[Bug middle-end/45758] [4.6 Regression] ICE in expr_invariant_in_loop_p

2010-09-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 10:44 --- Somehow works for me. What's your target? -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/45758] [4.6 Regression] ICE in expr_invariant_in_loop_p

2010-09-23 Thread Joost dot VandeVondele at pci dot uzh dot ch
--- Comment #2 from Joost dot VandeVondele at pci dot uzh dot ch 2010-09-23 10:46 --- gfortran -O3 -floop-block -c -v bug.f90 Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gfortran COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/data03/vondele/gcc_trunk/build/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.0/lto-wrapper Target:

[Bug middle-end/45758] [4.6 Regression] ICE in expr_invariant_in_loop_p

2010-09-23 Thread Joost dot VandeVondele at pci dot uzh dot ch
--- Comment #3 from Joost dot VandeVondele at pci dot uzh dot ch 2010-09-23 10:52 --- Under valgrind: ==5634== Invalid read of size 8 ==5634==at 0x936AD4: expr_invariant_in_loop_p (gimple.h:1149) ==5634==by 0xCE643E: evolution_function_is_invariant_rec_p (tree-chrec.c:1009)

[Bug tree-optimization/45750] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in iterative_hash_expr, at tree.c:6831 on invalid code

2010-09-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 11:00 --- Subject: Bug 45750 Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 23 11:00:27 2010 New Revision: 164555 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164555 Log: 2010-09-23 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de PR

[Bug tree-optimization/45750] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in iterative_hash_expr, at tree.c:6831 on invalid code

2010-09-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 11:00 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/45648] [4.6 regression] Unnecessary temporary for transpose calls as actual argument.

2010-09-23 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 11:11 --- Subject: Bug 45648 Author: mikael Date: Thu Sep 23 11:11:23 2010 New Revision: 164558 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164558 Log: 2010-09-23 Mikael Morin mik...@gcc.gnu.org PR

[Bug fortran/45745] [4.6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_stride

2010-09-23 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 11:11 --- Subject: Bug 45745 Author: mikael Date: Thu Sep 23 11:11:23 2010 New Revision: 164558 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164558 Log: 2010-09-23 Mikael Morin mik...@gcc.gnu.org PR

[Bug fortran/45757] Accepts invalid: SHAPE with scalar

2010-09-23 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 11:44 --- Mikael, thanks for checking! Close as INVALID. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/45751] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap failure: at stage 1 xgcc segfault

2010-09-23 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #6 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-23 12:02 --- if the array was intended to be an array of structs then this fixes: ... Currently at stage 2 for revision 164490 on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with the patch in comment #5. Thanks. Side question: what could be the

[Bug middle-end/45565] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in execute_todo, at passes.c:1276 with -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-inline -fipa-cp-clone -fkeep-inline-functions

2010-09-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 12:39 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/45565] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in execute_todo, at passes.c:1276 with -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-inline -fipa-cp-clone -fkeep-inline-functions

2010-09-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 12:39 --- Subject: Bug 45565 Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 23 12:39:26 2010 New Revision: 164561 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164561 Log: 2010-09-23 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de PR

[Bug lto/45759] New: LTO error link 32bits binary DLL x86_64-w64-mingw32 gcc-4_5-branch

2010-09-23 Thread t66667 at gmail dot com
Creating library file: .libs/libqt4_plugin.dll.a util/qvlcframe.hpp:197:13: error: '_ZThn8_N6QVLCMWD0Ev' has already been defined ./util/qvlcframe.hpp:197:13: note: previously defined here util/qvlcframe.hpp:197:13: error: '_ZThn8_N6QVLCMWD1Ev' has already been defined ./util/qvlcframe.hpp:197:13:

[Bug middle-end/44763] [4.4/4.5 regression] SEGV in allocno_priority_compare_func on Solaris 8

2010-09-23 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 13:05 --- Subject: Bug 44763 Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu Sep 23 13:05:39 2010 New Revision: 164562 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164562 Log: PR middle-end/44763 * ira-color.c

[Bug other/45760] New: GCC build fails: can't find MPC

2010-09-23 Thread avi at unix dot sh
I believe this is a bug in GCC 4.5.1 build system related to the introduction of MPC. I'm compiling GCC 4.5.1 and all its dependencies in my home directory and installing all (make install) at $HOME/OpenFOAM/ROOT At some GCC build stage it fails with this messages:

[Bug middle-end/44763] [4.4/4.5 regression] SEGV in allocno_priority_compare_func on Solaris 8

2010-09-23 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 13:07 --- Subject: Bug 44763 Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu Sep 23 13:07:01 2010 New Revision: 164563 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164563 Log: PR middle-end/44763 * ira-color.c

[Bug middle-end/44763] [4.4/4.5 regression] SEGV in allocno_priority_compare_func on Solaris 8

2010-09-23 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 13:08 --- Fixed everywhere. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/45745] [4.6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_stride

2010-09-23 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 13:23 --- Can the PR be closed? Or is something still missing? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45745

[Bug fortran/45745] [4.6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_stride

2010-09-23 Thread Joost dot VandeVondele at pci dot uzh dot ch
--- Comment #8 from Joost dot VandeVondele at pci dot uzh dot ch 2010-09-23 13:36 --- with the patch in place, CP2K compiles fine again. Thanks, closing as fixed. -- Joost dot VandeVondele at pci dot uzh dot ch changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/45760] GCC build fails: can't find MPC

2010-09-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 13:58 --- set LD_LIBRARY_PATH so the dynamic loader can find libmpc.so.2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45760

[Bug other/45760] GCC build fails: can't find MPC

2010-09-23 Thread avi at unix dot sh
--- Comment #2 from avi at unix dot sh 2010-09-23 14:03 --- I was able to make it pass that stage explicitly setting the library path like this: gcc-build$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$HOME/OpenFOAM/lib make I found this was not related to MPC since I moved to 4.4.4 (pre-MPC version of GCC) and I

[Bug other/45760] GCC build fails: can't find MPC

2010-09-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 14:08 --- GCC doesn't set runpaths in executables, this is intentional: http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#rpath If you don't want those support libs installed for their own sake and are only installing them for GCC to use, then a

[Bug fortran/45648] [4.6 regression] Unnecessary temporary for transpose calls as actual argument.

2010-09-23 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 14:13 --- Unless something breaks again, this should be fixed now. -- mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/45751] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap failure: at stage 1 xgcc segfault

2010-09-23 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-23 14:14 --- Bootstrapped revision 164560 on x86_64-apple-darwin10.4.0 with the following patch: --- ../_clean/gcc/config/darwin-driver.c2010-09-22 22:38:53.0 +0200 +++ gcc/config/darwin-driver.c 2010-09-23

[Bug bootstrap/45760] GCC build fails: can't find MPC

2010-09-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 14:14 --- this should be documented, either under the --with-gmp configuration docs or in the faq -- redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug treelang/45761] New: [4.6 regression] ICE: segmentation fault at gcc/expr.c:9863

2010-09-23 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
$ gdb /usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.6.0/cc1.exe Reading symbols from /usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.6.0/cc1.exe...done. (gdb) set args -quiet -v -I libdvdread4 -I libdvdcss -I libdvdread4 -I . -I /usr/include/freetype2 -MMD libdvdread4/ifo_read.d -MF libdvdread4/ifo_read.d -MT

[Bug treelang/45761] [4.6 regression] ICE: segmentation fault at gcc/expr.c:9863

2010-09-23 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
-common --param l1-cache-size=32 --param l1-cache-line-size=64 --param l2-cache-size=2048 -o ifo_read.s GNU C (GCC) version 4.6.0 20100923 (experimental) (i686-pc-cygwin) compiled by GNU C version 4.6.0 20100922 (experimental), GMP version 5.0.0, MPFR version 2.4.2, MPC version 0.8.1 GGC

[Bug treelang/45761] [4.6 regression] ICE: segmentation fault at gcc/expr.c:9863

2010-09-23 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #2 from zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-09-23 14:28 --- Most likely the same as PR45741. I think the testcase was reduced from the very same file. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45761

[Bug bootstrap/45760] GCC build fails: can't find MPC

2010-09-23 Thread avi at unix dot sh
--- Comment #5 from avi at unix dot sh 2010-09-23 14:46 --- Jonathan, your comment #3 was very helpful. I have a very bizarre situation dealing with cross compilers and entire platforms that must run in my home directory. Maybe the best and easier thing for my case is to statically

[Bug bootstrap/45760] GCC build fails: can't find MPC

2010-09-23 Thread avi at unix dot sh
--- Comment #6 from avi at unix dot sh 2010-09-23 14:47 --- Now I have a better understanding of GCC build system. -- avi at unix dot sh changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/45754] Driver core dump when duplicating -Wall command line option

2010-09-23 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-09-23 15:13 --- Subject: Re: Driver core dump when duplicating -Wall command line option Unless this can be reproduced with trunk I'd guess it was fixed by: 2010-06-09 Dave Korn dave.korn.cyg...@gmail.com *

[Bug fortran/45744] [4.6 Regression] ICE with -O1 in gfc_conv_expr_op, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1366

2010-09-23 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #10 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-23 15:27 --- This should be better: It is;-) it fixes this PR without regression. Does it answer also the question in comment #7? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45744

[Bug bootstrap/45760] GCC build fails: can't find MPC

2010-09-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 15:28 --- I'm going to add something to the docs, so I'll keep this PR open until I do that, so reopening ... -- redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/45760] GCC build fails: can't find MPC

2010-09-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 15:28 --- ... and assigning to myself again -- redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/45751] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap failure: at stage 1 xgcc segfault

2010-09-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 15:28 --- Side question: what could be the meaning of sizeof (struct cl_decoded_option *)? The size of the pointer (which can be useful sometimes but not in this case). -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug bootstrap/45751] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap failure: at stage 1 xgcc segfault

2010-09-23 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-09-23 15:30 --- Could someone commit the patch in comment #7. It cannot make the matter worse than it is without it. TIA -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45751

[Bug c++/45762] New: Same binary prints sign of nan on different systems.

2010-09-23 Thread j dot s4403 at gmail dot com
Due to a change in glibc, an identical binary compiled with g++ 4.3 and run on different systems prints a different result for nan. In the program at the end of the report, a x86_64 binary run on an Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS prints -nan while the same exact binary run on Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS prints nan.

[Bug objc/45763] New: incorrect @encode(BOOL *)

2010-09-23 Thread nicola at gcc dot gnu dot org
This was reported to me by David Chisnall via email - he mentioned - @encode(BOOL*) - it should return ^c or ^C (depending on whether BOOL is defined as signed or unsigned), but instead it returns *. This is inconsistent with clang and with Apple GCC. I also noticed that we already have a

[Bug middle-end/45325] [4.6 Regression] target attribute doesn't work with -march=i586

2010-09-23 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 15:53 --- (In reply to comment #1) Well - obviously global typedefs keep their BLKmode. The target attribute can't work this way - it's broken by design. If it is broken by design, why not remove it before people start

[Bug middle-end/45758] [4.6 Regression] ICE in expr_invariant_in_loop_p

2010-09-23 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 15:54 --- Subject: Bug 45758 Author: spop Date: Thu Sep 23 15:54:01 2010 New Revision: 164567 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164567 Log: Add testcase for PR45758. 2010-09-23 Sebastian Pop

[Bug c++/45762] Same binary prints sign of nan on different systems.

2010-09-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 15:59 --- It should be the same as C (as if done by printf) and our implementation relies on the C library to do it correctly -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45762

[Bug c++/45762] Same binary prints sign of nan on different systems.

2010-09-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 16:00 --- Therefore the glibc fix is required to get the correct output. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/44716] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap fails with partial inlining (r161382)

2010-09-23 Thread sje at cup dot hp dot com
--- Comment #17 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2010-09-23 16:27 --- It looks like GCC on IA64 HP-UX has a problem when a routine in .text.unlikely calls a function in .text. If I define UNLIKELY_EXECUTED_TEXT_SECTION_NAME and HOT_TEXT_SECTION_NAME to just be '.text' then I can

[Bug 43011] (web) Upgrade gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla to Bugzilla 3.6

2010-09-23 Thread LpSolit at netscape dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011 Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug 45764] (tree-optimization) New: wrong code -O2 vs -O3 (problem in vectorizer???)

2010-09-23 Thread wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45764 Summary: wrong code -O2 vs -O3(problem in vectorizer???) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug 45765] (debug) New: const array elements should be also const

2010-09-23 Thread jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com
be ISO C99 updated? Reproducer: const int a1[1]; __typeof__ (a1[0]) a2; const struct { int x; } b1; __typeof__ (b1.x) b2; gcc (GCC) 4.6.0 20100923 (experimental) -std=c99 -c -Wall -g GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2.50.20100923-cvs Actual: (gdb) ptype a1[0] type = int (gdb) ptype a2 type = const int (gdb

[Bug 45764] (tree-optimization) wrong code -O2 vs -O3 (problem in vectorizer???)

2010-09-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45764 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86-linux-gnu

[Bug 45766] (web) New: New Bugzilla UI changes horizontal items to vertical

2010-09-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45766 Summary: New Bugzilla UI changes horizontal items to vertical Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web

[Bug 45766] (web) New Bugzilla UI changes horizontal items to vertical

2010-09-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45766 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-23 22:22:58 UTC --- The headers and footnotes are all vertical instead of horizontal. -- Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Bug 45766] (web) New Bugzilla UI changes horizontal items to vertical

2010-09-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45766 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-23 22:25:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) The headers and footnotes are all vertical instead of horizontal. Can you show an example. I don't get this behavior with

[Bug 45767] (web) New: I am able to change Last reconfirmed date:

2010-09-23 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45767 Summary: I am able to change Last reconfirmed date: Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: web AssignedTo:

[Bug 45768] (web) New: Input boxes overflow with low resolutions.

2010-09-23 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45768 Summary: Input boxes overflow with low resolutions. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: web AssignedTo:

[Bug 45767] (web) I am able to change Last reconfirmed date:

2010-09-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45767 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug 45767] (web) I am able to change Last reconfirmed date:

2010-09-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45767 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-23 22:35:41 UTC --- Interesting because my test account cannot change the last reconfirmed date. Though it can change it to a future date. -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 45767] (web) I am able to change Last reconfirmed date:

2010-09-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45767 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-23 22:37:01 UTC --- And I checked to make sure you are not part of the groups that can change a thing too. -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 45769] (web) New: Bugzilla help doesn't match actual fields

2010-09-23 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45769 Summary: Bugzilla help doesn't match actual fields Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: web AssignedTo:

[Bug 45769] (web) Bugzilla help doesn't match actual fields

2010-09-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45769 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug 45404] (c) /*code-comment*/ related

2010-09-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45404 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug 45766] (web) New Bugzilla UI changes horizontal items to vertical

2010-09-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45766 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-23 22:59:10 UTC --- My header looks like --- Home New Browse Search ... --- -- Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

[Bug 45766] (web) New Bugzilla UI changes horizontal items to vertical

2010-09-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45766 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-23 23:02:36 UTC --- It happens on Windows XP with both IE and Firefox. It looks OK on Fedora 13. -- Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ---

[Bug 45770] (c++) New: global access allowance exceeds that of derived class

2010-09-23 Thread MichieldeB at aim dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45770 Summary: global access allowance exceeds that of derived class Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug 45766] (web) New Bugzilla UI changes horizontal items to vertical

2010-09-23 Thread LpSolit at netscape dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45766 --- Comment #5 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-23 23:14:45 UTC --- You have to shift+reload to clear the old CSS files from your browser cache. -- Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Bug 45770] (c++) global access allowance exceeds that of derived class

2010-09-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45770 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug 45766] (web) New Bugzilla UI changes horizontal items to vertical

2010-09-23 Thread LpSolit at netscape dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45766 Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug 45767] (web) I am able to change Last reconfirmed date:

2010-09-23 Thread LpSolit at netscape dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45767 Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 45768] (web) Input boxes overflow with low resolutions.

2010-09-23 Thread LpSolit at netscape dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45768 Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug 45769] (web) Bugzilla help doesn't match actual fields

2010-09-23 Thread LpSolit at netscape dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45769 --- Comment #2 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net 2010-09-23 23:35:54 UTC --- Things will be better in Bugzilla 4.0. But for now, yes, edit this template. :) -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 45771] (c) New: Source operands for conditional moves

2010-09-23 Thread rmansfield at qnx dot com
Thread model: posix gcc version 4.6.0 20100923 (experimental) [trunk revision 164569] (GCC) #define NULL 0 typedef struct List List; struct List { List *next; int stuff; }; extern List Ignore; extern List *pending, **tail; extern void process(List *); void proc_all() { List *irp

[Bug 45771] (target) Source operands for conditional moves

2010-09-23 Thread rmansfield at qnx dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45771 Ryan Mansfield rmansfield at qnx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target ---

[Bug 45772] (web) New: Bugzilla doesn't have enabled voting, yet it appears at few places

2010-09-23 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45772 Summary: Bugzilla doesn't have enabled voting, yet it appears at few places Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3

  1   2   >